thread: If bubs was breech - could you tell?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Dec 2007
    Sunny Qld
    14,682

    Michelle - when I had my OB appointment at... 19 weeks I think it was, bubs was transverse - which none of my other two had ever been, both of them were head down from the beginning. Does this mean a greater chance of bubs being breech if they are sorta "floating" around instead of being head down from the get go?

    Thanks to everyone else for their experiences too

    I forgot that I had a midwives appointment this morning (whoops, gotta go get ready I guess!) so I'm sure she will be able to plow through the fat on my belly and let me know.. lol

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Jul 2006
    Melbourne
    3,715

    LOL Mel good luck!

    FWIW, a friend of mine was concerned because her second bub was breech as she approached 37 weeks. She was devastated the day she was going for her check up because she was convinced that bub was still breech and that they would want to book her in for a c-section. But as it turned out bub had most definitely moved and was head down! She couldn't believe it, she was positive bub was still breech!

    So there's another story to add to the list

  3. #3
    BellyBelly Member

    Oct 2007
    Ever so slowly going crazy...
    2,268

    Babe, dont stress just yet!!! I know, easier said than done..

    My last 3 were either breech or transverse up till 36-39 weeks... Harmony was planted VERY deep into my pelvis with her butt, and still turned, (about 38wks?)!!!

    Transverse at this stage is better than breech, bub may be headed to "head down" possy! Half way there!! You can rub your belly in the downwards sweep when you massage or moisturise too. If you find where bubs head is, some frozen veg on there can make them head down further too!

    eta... I could tell where my bubs were that were breech, transverse... but they were babies # 4,5 & 6!!!
    Last edited by Pretty Butterfly; July 28th, 2009 at 09:38 AM.

  4. #4
    Lucy in the sky with diamonds.

    Jan 2005
    Funky Town, Vic
    7,070

    don't forget to look at the spinning babies website!

    ETA - TD, doesn't the fluid regenerate?
    Last edited by Lulu; July 28th, 2009 at 09:07 AM.

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Dec 2007
    Sunny Qld
    14,682

    Back from midwife appointment, she couldn't feel exactly where bubs is (too much fat on me, too little baby.. lol) but she said it is definitely NOT head down. After she explored down there, I told her neither was my bladder anymore.

    So yeah, gotta wait and see I guess!

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Add ~clover~ on Facebook

    Sep 2007
    travelling
    9,557

    Hi

    Just thought I'd tell you about a mates twins...more for a bit of reassurance than anything
    At I think 35 weeks the girl was head down, the boy breech...36 weeks, they switched completely! He was head down, she was head up...37 weeks...Both head down, her engaged, ready to go. 37+4 both born vaginally!

    Just figured if they both had room to move that far (in a size 6 body!!!!) at that late stage, I wouldn't be too worried just yet

  7. #7
    Registered User

    Dec 2007
    1,794

    At my appointment at 28ish weeks, bub wasn't head down, but when I was there at 33 weeks he was.. So still plenty of time for him/her to turn without your dreams of VBAC being placed in limbo..

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Jan 2009
    Dulwich Hill, Sydney
    23

    ETA - TD, doesn't the fluid regenerate?
    During pregnancy, yes, but once the membranes are ruptured any more fluid produced would just continue to leak and you need a really good amount of fluid for an ECV.

  9. #9
    Registered User

    Dec 2006
    In the Angelic Realm
    1,675

    don't forget to look at the spinning babies website!

    ETA - TD, doesn't the fluid regenerate?
    I guess not Lulu. The obs wanted me in hospital quick smart. He didn't want to take any risks. I went home and packed and was back in the hospital within the hour. They had a bed and everything for me. They wanted to wait a week for DS to be 38 weeks, but his size was good enough, so i had him the next day (i think!)

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Add Jakabella on Facebook

    Nov 2007
    in Love!
    2,586

    Bella was breach till 38 weeks and then she turned her self and was 3/5th engaged but also was posterior which they didnt know till I have been in labour for 12 hrs and then she was stuck with her head on the side and had to have a c/s - but goes to show she was breach for nealy the whole time but turned by her self. I also had my placenta in the front so it muffled the kicks and they felt like they were coming form eveywhere so I was confused as to where she was lying!

    Hth - bub will spin in time I bettcha!

    Kate

  11. #11
    Registered User

    Jan 2006
    Sydney
    2,212

    The issue with transverse lie is if you go into labour and your membranes rupture there is a risk of the cord prolapsing. Admission is required until the baby turns to a favourable / less risky position (head up or down - there just needs to be something *solid* blocking the exit). There is no need for a c-section immediately but there is the need for monitoring and an operating theatre immediately available until that change in position (or labour ) occurs.

    Mel - the transverse position at this stage isn't an issue. Your uterus (pardon my description ) is floppy and stretched after 2 other bubbas so there is more room to hang around. DD was my third pregnancy and stayed in transverse until late in the pregnancy. I mean, why would you hang upside-down when hammock is soooooooo much more comfortable

  12. #12
    Registered User

    Dec 2006
    In the Angelic Realm
    1,675

    My son was born transverse lie at 37.5 weeks.

    I was constantly being told by the midwives up until by 37.5 weeks that he was head down and everything was honky dory. I had an obs look at me at my 37 week appt and he said that my bub was breech. Asked if he was kicking up near the ribs or down below and i said that most of the movement was down below. He was constantly kicking me in the bladder and had to go to the loo every 30 mins.

    I told the obs, how could that be as my son was always heads down at all my appts. He said that the midwives may have mistaken his bum as being his head. I was send straight out of his office to have an u/s. The u/s showed that he was transverse lie at that point. Went back to his office and he said that i need to go home and come back to the hospital as i was being admitted in that night. He could not risk me going home and waiting weeks before labour onset. I had my son by c/s a few days later. He was born transverse. I count myself lucky that the obs reecognised my son as being breech/transverse otherwise he may not have been alive today if i had gone into labour at home and waited hours for the contractions to get closer together and all the fluid drained out.

    GL.