Pressure to Have the "Perfect Birth"

Speaking for myself I know what an amazing experience I found it to be very present, in control and drug free for the birth of my son so I do try and share that experience for others in the hope that they will not be scared of giving birth and discover the experience they can have without interventions.

That said, I would never actually pressure a person to go that way and I don't scorn people who don't choose to (or medically can't) birth the same way I did. Perhaps your friends are just hoping to educate you on the over medicalised industry in the hope of a great outcome for you? Obviously whatever you want to do is the right thing so long as you are making informed choices.

Satya, having had a drug free VB, especially after a previous birth with epidural, I can definitely understand why women want a drug free birth. Once you've experienced it you know how amazing it is, and how much better you feel afterwards.

If a 'bully' is someone who wishes for people to avoid unnecessary trauma and unpleasantness, so be it :) How odd! It seems women are more prepared to accept the fear of god than to be told they can have better than that! The Business of Being Born addresses this very thing.
I would never be grateful to anyone who led me to believe that birth is a traumatic affair that is best left to doctors. I am grateful to those who helped me achieve what I did and I still resent the horror-storytellers, to this day. Take your pick!

Look, I largely agree with you, but you are simply more likely to get people to see you POV if you don't come across as being so militant. I find a gently-gently approach works for me.

Yes, you're right. Some people will see me as militant, others will just see me as I do - being upfront and honest about explaining my reality without being afraid of how others will judge me (and I know they will, I'm just not afraid of it). Gently-gently often lets a lot of women down, too and I'm satisfied with my approach for now (I was never one to say "I'm not a feminist, but..." ;) )

You can take the 'in your face' or militant approach if you want to, that's fine if that's what your personality is, but you can't honestly be surprised when you realise that some people don't take too kindly to that type of approach. I know I can hear a lot better when I'm not being *shouted* at.

You have to choose your mode of delivery (no pun intended) when it comes to sharing the knowledge you have. Maybe my approach wont work all the time either, and I don't have an issue with taking a harder stance if I have to, but come on, you have to admit that people are more receptive to your ideas when you are at least nice about it. Part of education is building a rapport with them, make them want to listen to what you have to say, not force them to. And after all that you have to accept that some women just don't want to listen that that is completely fine, because its not your life they are living it is theirs and they have to WANT to change it for themselves, not be told they have to because they are naive and uneducated.

I don't imagine that you, Mayaness, would take too kindly to someone bursting your bubble, so maybe that can be respected in others?

This is such an interesting thread and as i have had afew sleepless nights over this id like to share, it a bit of a long sorry:
I had aperfect preg with DS with no hickups til the birth i ended up with a nasty 3rd degree tear which took monthes to repair and years to get over, my son popped his lung and ended up in special care for 3 days and not sure if its connected but 1.5 years of fertility treatment with induction, insemination and finally IVF, i should point out that i study natural medicine and tried everything in my power before medical intervention. I fell preg last year and ended up with an ectopic, more medical intervention, and the loss of my tube!
The ob and midwife who birthed my son said CS next time, the ob i saw for my ectopic said CS, my new ob is saying CS, not only beacuse of last time, but it is anatomical and because of my mothers history of bowel prolapse! I have tried in vain to get information and cannot get anything unbiased, i read that you say everyone is all about intervention, drugs, obs etc. but my experience has been the opposite, even when i posted in a "so called" CS support forum i got inudated with all the risks involved with CS when i was asking for help. Im sorry but i find the web is an open slather for CS vigiliantes who want to preach what they think is best, if anyone made me feel bad and depressed for my so called "elective" it is these people! I realise there are risks believe me im well educated on them, but for me there is risks in VB and i realise your probably thinking im saving my own skin and its not whats best for my baby. Well unlike my mum i want to go camping and hiking and play sport without worrying about incontinence, or worst case senerio having a coloscopy bag!! I could go on and on, but the strongest point in all this that i want to make is that as women we should support each others choices NOT subject one another to our own strong opinions, it is these strong view points that play on our minds on those sleepless nights and at those times when we are feeling low. Isnt it so wonderful today that we have a choice and that maternal and paternal death rates are so much lower than they were years ago. Live and let live!

[QUOTE=monnie;1217312],
Trust yourself, trust the choices you make... It's hard not to be affected by the opinions and feelings of others...but ultimately, they don't live in your shoes. Said perfectly, it's your body, your baby, and NO ONE I don't care who they are knows whats going to happen, but remember women have been doing this for centries, and alot back in "the day", did it on their own.

So to qoute monnie again....... Trust yourself, trust the choices you make, coz they'll be your instincts that kick in, so going with that and your OB (who's yes is trained as you said)! you're gonna rock hun.:hug:

Scooby- exactly! you are more than well-informed about what you have to do; in fact, it's not even a choice for you, so it's empowering for you to be completely informed about the only path you have to take. Of course there are cases where not having a CS is far more risky than the side effects of intervention...that's what the interventions are for and I have never, ever said that interventions, OB's and medical births don't have a role to play in birthing. So many women have no choice but to have a medicalised birth and don't realise that they can still be active participants and ask very little questions about the process (I am really happy for you and heartened, Scooby, that are on the ball with your situation). And heaps of women prefer to ask few questions, so be it. For me that's a bit too much like a blank cheque. Some don't realise they CAN ask questions and forums like this let them know otherwise.
Trillian - like I said, you're right. And someone else is going to read what I've written, it will resonate with them and they will disagree with the angle you've taken with the same material. You'd both be right. I'm not going to bend over backwards appealing to everyone and saying nothing in particular about what I've experienced and learned. And on the contrary, if my bubble is to be burst for great benefit to me, I would hope to be gracious enough to accept a correction to a misperception! I had some bubbles burst in my pregnancy and was eternally grateful for it. Funny how it really is ok to tell someone that birth is traumatic and that they should leave it to an OB to look after and it's not ok to suggest to people that they can have a fabulous birth with just midwives if their pregnancy is normal (with the normal back up that midwives have for necessary interventions). Really not understanding what's not 'nice' about the latter. And there's no forcing of anything - you choose or don't choose, I can't make anyone do or think anything they don't want to do, simple.
Just saying: do yourself a favour, ask questions, birth doesn't have to be a spectator sport.

Hey, whilst i am not pregnant yet i am feeling major pressure even just in the TTC phase about having the perfect birth. I find that most people think you should have the drug free, doula present home or birthing unit style birth and that annoys me. I am hoping to use SJOG in subiaco and know that it has a great repuatation. I don't mind having an epidural or gas either and feel relieved and comforted by the fact of having my own ob. I am trying not to let it bother me but it does. People should just keep there opinions to themselves :angry:

All this talk of bubble bursting....

I posted about the risks of sections on Scooby's thread. In the initial post all that was said was that there had been a 3rd degree tear in the previous delivery.

I posted the medical facts. The statistically established truth - tears that bad are rare and can be avoided in most cases by the mother's position, controlled pushing and avoiding epidural and a c-section would not be necessary to avoid one. I don't seek to burst a bubble. It's the truth.

If, following a terrible birthing experience, a long recovery, and a family background of associated problems, a woman still chooses to go the surgical route that is neither surprising nor wrong. I think what bothers me is the risks of EITHER being played down. So many women have a section and say "I'd never have forgiven myself if s/he got hurt in a natural birth". Would they forgive themselves if the surgeon cut their baby's face with the scalpel? If the baby couldn't breathe alone for a day? If the baby needed to go to NICU for post-surgical problems? If the baby never managed to breastfeed? If their NEXT baby died of a placental abruption caused by a placenta praevia attached to the scar? Or if their NEXT baby never came because they lost their uterus during surgery?

In terms of numbers and mortality/morbidity c-sections ARE SAFE. But in all but a handful (WHO states 10-15%) vaginal birth is safer. The risks need to be FULLY weighed. Fear governs too many choices around pregnancy and birth IMO - not really fears of women who have in FACT had scary experiences, but the fears of women who have not given birth yet, the inherent fear of our society of the process of birth.

I will always try to present women with the fullest facts i can, i will always try to inform, rather than scaremonger. But i also recognise that having had only one blissful homebirth under my belt i can NEVER truly understand the fears in the heart of a woman who, for WHATEVER reason, nearly lost her baby or her life while giving birth.

Bx

Yep, Steffi - don't let anyone tell you what you 'should' be doing! It's one thing to say what you could do, it's quite another to presume to tell someone it's what they should do. And for some people, the more they learn about epi's etc, the less they want to use them, depending on what kind of pg they are having (normal or high-risk).
I don't keep my opinions and experiences to myself here on BB because that's not what internet forums are for ;) I will share what kinds of things people could do to achieve a more satisfying birth experience, too and why I believe these to be of benefit :) Then you can just take it or leave it from there!
Good luck with TTC :)

Thanks Mayaness, I think everyone should just have respect for each others opinions and not push onto each other. It's nice to hear peoples advice and i am always interested in hearing about others experiences. I recently looked into hiring a doula to be present when i do concieve and give birth in hospital but i found that the woman i spoke to was much more interested in telling me i was making a bad decision and steering me towards a home birth. By the end i was turned off doulas for life and still kinda feel that way. I was looking for extra support because i suffer anxiety and not to feel the complete opposite which is how she made me feel. Who knows maybe with my subsequent births i may change my views but for my first i want to be in hospital and i should alos add that my husband and i have been researching our birth choices for 8 years and my decision is pretty well informed to me. I just can't believe peoples attitudes towards this subject, why can't everyone just respect each other. We all have to learn via our own experiences so it may be that i regret my decision but maybe i would regret going the other way and not trusting my instincts.

Maya, I think your words can inspire others to search for what they need, and give them the confidence to question what they want and CAN achieve. Militant? Maybe, but your passion inspires too.

Scooby, if you had previously posted and only given a part of the information, you can't help someone wondering if you had been given all your options.

Steffi, you have to interview doulas like you did your OB. The doula you spoke to may have been better suited to someone who was looking for a homebirth (and maybe listened to what you wanted ;) ). I hear some can get a bit militant themselves, but my experience has been freakin awesome and the doulas around BB just cant be beat.

This is what a forum is all about! We should all be able to express our opinions as strongly as we want to, as long as we are well-informed and not personally insulting anybody.
If you don't want to hear other peoples views then don't join a forum! :)

I think the people who feel 'pressure' to have the perfect birth have to work it out within themselves. It's not the fault of anyone on BB or whatever - if someone is unfairly pressuring you then you are hanging around the wrong group of friends. You need to join a cheersquad of those who have the same aspirations as you, and will encourage you. I want a homebirth next and I feel no pressure, because I know I can do it, I have had a drug free birth before, within the hour of getting to the hospital (whats the point of the trip? I had no complications and felt NO pressure). I know I may need to transfer. So as long as you have a balanced view, know both sides of the fence, have educated yourself appropriately and have good support then who cares what people think, seriously... nothing in life is perfect, some of us are perfectionists, some not.

Midwives are the experts in normal birth. Obstetricians are not. They are experts in complications, they are surgeons, and as they say in the BOBB, they should be doing surgery, all day, everyday because that is what they are good at. They don't know how to do normal birth and it belongs to midwives, who have been turned into servants of the system with no power, insurance... it's like saying, lets replace all GPs with Ear, Nose & Throat Specialists incase those people with a cold get pneumonia.... overkill. Everyone has the right to choose and I am all for it, but there is lack of basic understanding here, and women wonder why they ended up with inductions, epidurals, forceps, infections post birth, PND.... just another thing to think about. Too confronting for some people to even consider. I would engage an obstetrician ONLY if I was genuinely high risk.

As a Birth Attendant (doula) I know there is a major problem at the moment. There is no regulation (which would be controversial anyway) and there are lots of trainers who teach different methods - online, offline, short courses, longer ones and I feel there are some major problems all round. They should NOT bring their own baggage into a birth and I do get very angry at some things I hear and see. There are good doulas out there, go on recommendations from friends - even BB members. Lots of my clients are word of mouth and thats how it should be. I heard yesterday one doula said on a public forum that she wanted to slap the mother for listening to the Ob. She is waaaay out of line. Keep looking, great doulas are so worth it.

I do not believe the intent of this forum was to get opinions on natural v's medical intervened births. Sophiebear was wondering if anyone else felt this same pressure, not if everyone can give their opinions.

My reccomendation to you Sophiebear is that you should educate yourself on the birth process & try to be as well informed about labour as you can be. When discussing labour & birth with people, tell them you are preparing to 'go with the flow' & see whether you will accept pain relief/intervention once you have hit that stage. If you are well informed & educated about labour & giving birth, then you should be able to 'play it by ear'. Hopefully that will avoid the heated discussion about natural v's medical intervened. It is your choice, but you should make an informed choice.

:

---

Thanks Mayaness, I think everyone should just have respect for each others opinions and not push onto each other. It's nice to hear peoples advice and i am always interested in hearing about others experiences. I recently looked into hiring a doula to be present when i do concieve and give birth in hospital but i found that the woman i spoke to was much more interested in telling me i was making a bad decision and steering me towards a home birth. By the end i was turned off doulas for life and still kinda feel that way. I was looking for extra support because i suffer anxiety and not to feel the complete opposite which is how she made me feel. Who knows maybe with my subsequent births i may change my views but for my first i want to be in hospital and i should alos add that my husband and i have been researching our birth choices for 8 years and my decision is pretty well informed to me. I just can't believe peoples attitudes towards this subject, why can't everyone just respect each other. We all have to learn via our own experiences so it may be that i regret my decision but maybe i would regret going the other way and not trusting my instincts.

---

Steffi that is really disappointing to hear that you struck a doula who didn't respect your choice to birth in hospital.
It's true there are some doulas out there who so abhor hospital births and have decided as a matter of conscience that they won't lie to women about what they know and what they have seen of hospital birth, and who push homebirth strongly as an option. It sounds like the doula you met with was completely mismatched with you and that's a shame.

But I can assure you that most doulas wouldn't try to influence your choices like that, that's not what we are here for.

FWIW, I do not believe that labour is the best time to be 'playing it by ear', for mother or baby. A well-thought out plan is critical to having your wishes and philosophies considered (even if they cannot be adhered to down to the letter, if you've discussed your learning and beliefs with your caregivers, they will accord you respect according to those things when it comes down to the wire) otherwise it is THEIR agenda they will follow and their agenda becomes your agenda by default, if you outline nothing else for them. Find out what their agenda is, what their policies are in each eventuality before you decide that you are happy for their agenda to be yours, is my ultimate recommendation for women who think they want to 'go with the flow'. 'The flow' is often, in these cases, not to flow of the mother, but that of the hospital - conditional upon tailored policy, funding (which influences behind-the-scenes decisions and facilities), bed availability, practitioner availability, etc). Going with 'the flow' is very much like an open cheque, as I've said before...your cheque, not theirs. Decisions are made with the best interests of the hospital right up there with the best interests of the mother (and I'm being generous here!). If you 'go with the flow', please know what it means - a new baby requires all the energy that regret can use up. You don't always have to learn by your own mistakes - you are allowed to learn from others' ;)
Being 'empowered' is not a fashion statement (I really don't know about the 'pressure for perfect birth' fashionability, I must be out of that loop!), it's a recommendation that contributes to higher levels of wellbeing for mother and baby. That's how I see it, and that's where I'm coming from in all of this. In my own social circles, 'empowerment' is definitely not the fashionable thing, 'going with the flow' is - however, in my booby and birth circles (that I found after DS was born) it's the opposite, thank goodness, so I have great support for next time round :)

This is an interesting discussion with a lot of objective and subjective opinion. I have said before on this discussion thread that I truly believe that the best birth is the one where both the mother and baby are healthy and happy. How you achieve that is personal - based on choice, personal circumstances and hopefully, based on a fully informed/educated decision.

However, I cannot agree with you Kelly when you make the generalisation that "Midwives are the experts in normal birth. Obstetricians are not. They are experts in complications, they are surgeons, and as they say in the BOBB, they should be doing surgery, all day, everyday because that is what they are good at. They don't know how to do normal birth and it belongs to midwives" (sorry I dont know how to put in the quotes). Yes, Obstetricians have been trained in surgery, they have been trained in how to deal with complications but that does not mean that they aren't also advocates for patients having as 'natural' a birth as possible. This certainly is not my experience.

With my DD, my Obstetrician knew I wanted to try for drug free (especially as I am sensitive to a lot of drugs and was fearful of having a reaction). When the pain was too much for me to bear after 8 hours and I requested an epidural, he sat down with DH and I to make sure that this was really what I wanted. He wanted to make sure that I was happy with my decision to have a labour assisted with drugs. In the end, it was good that I did because DD had the cord wrapped around her neck and after 2 hours of pushing and no results she had to be vacuumed out. But my Obstetrician was very supportive of me having a 'drug free' birth and this time around, has automatically assumed that I will be trying for the same.

Secondly, my Mum who had drug free, absolutely 'pain free births' certainly was happy to have a 'go' at me for having a 'painful' birth. She could not understand why it was painful and four years later continues to hype the fact that she has a better 'pain threshold' than me. This is not the case - every pregnancy and every labour is different for every person and it annoys me to the core that I am made to feel inadequate by my Mother and other people for having a painful labour and for taking drugs. This time around, my baby is big for its size and whilst my Obstetrician is strongly encouraging me to have a vaginal birth, I will not hesitate to have a c/s if at the end of the day either my baby or I need it. I work in the largest private maternity hospital in WA and am fully informed and educated about the risks associated with vaginal, c/s, drug free, drug assisted etc etc births and I will make my birthing decisions based on my circumstances with my Obstetrician keeping me fully informed of where my labour is at.

One thing we must not forget, is that maternal and neonatal deaths have dramatically declined over the last century and even over the last two decades, something which is directly attributable to the 'overmedicalised' Obstetric fraternity.

For my part, I dont give a flying f*&% how anyone else has their child I only care that when I have my babies that they are healthy and ok and so am I. So lets just stop admonishing people for how they give birth and let them make their own informed choices. And if they dont want to be informed, well thats their decision too. If they want to be led by their Obstetrician, that is just another type of decision made.

Lets also remember that when your son or daughter is 21 years of age they wont be saying in their 21st speech - 'thanks Mum for having a drug free, vaginal birth' - or 'thanks Mum for having that c/s' the main point is that they were born healthy and that they were nurtured, loved and disciplined throughout their childhood, adolescence and into adulthood and that they become good, happy people.

Thanks NATTY My point exactly. You just don't know how you're birth will pan out, so be prepared for the different options.

by Georgi:

:

---

be prepared

---

precisely. I don't see how this contradicts anything that's been said about how to approach birth :)

Yes but by making informed choices it can pan out better than wait and see. If you want a natural birth (the majority do) but choose private hospitals and obs, well you have chosen something that is most likely to land you intervention and c/s. And most of those women think they are getting continuity of care so don't bother with doulas or any other experienced labour support, then they realise that their Ob only comes to check on you once if at all, to catch the baby or for complications. Who helps you keep on track with your labour? Your partner who has never seen birth/supported a woman before? The midwife who has 8-10 women to care for at the same time and has to write so many notes she can't hold your hand? We have one of the highest c/s rates in the world, higher than the US - you cannot wait and see and expect a natural birth unless you fluke it.

No matter what your persuasion is, I would love to hear your opinions AFTER watching the Business of Being Born. If you watch it and remain unchanged, good on you. But if you don't then great too.

I don't mind if you disagree with me natty - thats fine. You are disagreeing with lots of people, not just me :) In fact Obs in the BOBB too! One well known US Ob who actually says, 'Midwives actually do a better job than we do at the normal births. We aren't excited at normal birth... etc' and he wasn't alone. Everyone who hasn't - see it - I dare you ;) Then lets have a pow wow :)

I think Natty makes some interesting points, and if its ok, I'd like to respond to a couple.

:

---

This is an interesting discussion with a lot of objective and subjective opinion. I have said before on this discussion thread that I truly believe that the best birth is the one where both the mother and baby are healthy and happy. How you achieve that is personal - based on choice, personal circumstances and hopefully, based on a fully informed/educated decision.

---

I heartily agree.

:

---

For my part, I dont give a flying f*&% how anyone else has their child I only care that when I have my babies that they are healthy and ok and so am I. So lets just stop admonishing people for how they give birth and let them make their own informed choices. And if they dont want to be informed, well thats their decision too. If they want to be led by their Obstetrician, that is just another type of decision made.

---

Exactly. Personally, I don't think I have heard anyone telling anyone else that they have made the 'wrong decision' for their birth. I have heard lots of women passionately declaring their views on the topic, and rightly suggesting that we all be supportive of each others choices and differences. When people point out the dangers of intervention, they are trying to offer information that will assist in educating a person's decision. I am SO glad that these people offer this information (even when it makes me uncomfortable) because it makes me MORE SECURE in my decision for the birth I WANT.

:

---

Lets also remember that when your son or daughter is 21 years of age they wont be saying in their 21st speech - 'thanks Mum for having a drug free, vaginal birth' - or 'thanks Mum for having that c/s' the main point is that they were born healthy and that they were nurtured, loved and disciplined throughout their childhood, adolescence and into adulthood and that they become good, happy people.

---

Drugs can cross the placenta and affect your baby's health. Like anything, we weigh up the risk against the benefit. If the benefit is greater than the risk, it is the right decision. For me, the risk was too great, but I had a very normal pregnancy, birth and baby. I know Natalie won't thank me for it, but I don't care. I'm confident I made the healthiest choice for my baby. There are going to be other decisions I make for her health that she won't thank me for either. But I will again choose what's best for her in that situation, regardless of whether she ever acknowleges that decision. So will anyone as a parent.

Can I also add a general point: there are loads of people on here (and people I've met IRL) who are passionate about informing others of the dangers of intervention because they feel horribly let down and traumatised by their experiences. To say that in every birth situation the only thing that's important is a healthy mother and baby is insensitive and hurtful to these people. If that is all that matters to you, fine. Again, the whole point of education is to help you make a decision you are happy with. But there are countless cases of women having to undergo unnecessary medical procedures, having the choice taken from them, and being psychologically and/or physically damaged for the rest of their lives. Their passion is warranted IMO, and I don't think they are selfish for feeling incredibly ripped off and wanting to prevent the same thing from happening to their friends.

Snacks - thank you for your comments. When I say that the only thing that matters is that the final outcome is a happy and healthy mother and baby I am in no way meaning to be insensitive to mothers who have been traumatised or upset by the type of labour they had. I in no way had a pleasant experience. I was in agony, I watched my daughters heart rate drop with every contraction because of the cord, I was exhausted and I had an epi. For a long time after my birth I was upset by it but I guess for me, and for many of my female friends who also didnt find their birth experience enjoyable, the best way we can accept it and go on to have other babies is to say well it wasnt enjoyable and it wasnt what we wanted/planned but at the end of the day, we and our babies are ok. One of my girlfriends even set up a support group in Qld because she was so traumatised by her birth experience and yet she even says that at the end of the day, to her, the main thing is that her and her baby were ok. I guess it is a way of accepting our birth experience and moving forward. And thats ok, because that is how we choose to deal with it and its not being insensitive to others, its being sensitive to how we feel. Its like anything, other people can choose to look at it that way, and they can choose not too.

Kelly - my experience differs to the one you suggest with private hospitals. My Obstetrician was in an out of my delivery probably every half an hour to check up on me and yes, he walked me through my labour - he wasnt there just to catch the baby. Furthermore, my midwife was with me from 6am in the morning (the minute we walked in) to the minute I left the room for the ward at 8pm at night. She didnt have any other patients to care for. Just me and my husband. And she is going to be my midwife this time around again.

And yes you are right, we have the highest c/s rate in the industrialised world. And no its not right. I work in a private hospital and we are doing everything that we can to reduce the c/s rate to get it to a level that is acceptable. However, although we develop and print brochures to inform our patients, work closely with our Obstetricians, make doulas known and available to our patients, provide education sessions to women and their partners, a lot of them (for reasons which we know but which I will not go into in this forum) CHOOSE to have an elective c/s. Even in our c/s education sessions we encourage women to consider vaginal delivery as an option. From a quality and risk perspective for our hospital, high c/s rates are an ongoing issue which we are continually working with our Obstetricians to reduce. Yes, there are some 'old school' Obs that dont want to know about vaginal delivery's - I admit that, but as well there are quite a few Obstetricians that are keen to reduce the c/s rate (at least at our hospital) and encourage the 'natural' approach to birthing.

I really think the most important point here, is that women need to educate themselves about the options, and the consequences of those options. And this is more than just hiring an ob and listening to what they say. It means listening to other people's experiences and lots of reading. When people share their experiences, it might seem like they are "pushing" their ideals on to you. If that's the case, see past that to understand what they are saying and why. People who are passionate about something usually have a good reason for it. The one thing I can say from experience, is that going in expecting to "go with the flow" is not good enough. It's just not that easy.

I went into my first labour not wanting an epidural, but being prepared to 'go with the flow'. I was pressured into having one and gave in easily for two reasons. One was that while in labour I was in no position to make a decision and secondly was that I really didn't know the implications of having one. Had I known then all the effects that I would experience from having an epidural, I would have gone into labour with a firm plan to avoid it. I didn't go into labour with a firm plan, or with anywhere near enough information. So what I am sure would have been a quick, easy birth like DS2, turned into a cascade of interventions.

My waters were artificially broken before I knew what was happening. Labour was then so intense that they encouraged (I would almost say forced) me to have an epidural. Which made my labour slow and my baby go into foetal distress. So I'm pushing while lying on my back (as I couldn't feel my legs, and my bp was too low from the epidural to sit up) and it's not effective. I caused myself life long problems with haemorrhoids as a result. Forceps were needed so I got a tear and episotomy. This caused stitches and a lot of pain for weeks after the birth. For 2 days afterwards I felt unwell, and getting around was really hard. I was pretty much confined to bed for the first day or so and didn't even change my own baby's nappies myself. So mum and baby were both healthy afterwards, but it still could have gone so much better.

Fast forward to my second labour. I have read lots here on BB and books like New Active Birth. I go into labour and find a comfy position. Baby arrives quickly and easily (so to speak LOL!!) in 3 hours. I have a small tear which I felt no pain from after the event. Straight after the birth I can get up and move around, and I feel fantastic. The difference between the two births was amazing. And the only real difference was the extra knowledge I had second time around in order to help myself birth in a better way.

This is why I want people to know of other's experiences. Because you don't know what you don't know. And I don't want people to be disappointed, and I don't want people to end up with life long problems from unnecessary interventions. And gathering information before the birth is so critical to the outcome. Sure, at the end of the day we all make our own choices and we will all make different choices. That is ok. All I hope for is that people are able to make INFORMED choices. And getting information about birth, good information, is not so easy.

At work so trying to have quick peek in here just wanted to say to hoobley and Lulu i was actually talking in reference to another website CS support Not BB my post was rather scanty in there (but not the other site) and i found what you said hoobley to be unbaised you gave the facts and supported my desicion, please know it wasnt BB and i should have said that in my post. Sorry

In reference to the OP again... I just remembered a dinner we were at recently where my H and I were laughing about some of the gory bits of our son's birth (like the mooshed up head) and one of the other ladies said "Well I'm going to have a c-section" in a tone that made me feel she implying I had been irresponsible to my baby's health and a little uncouth to have had a natural birth. So I think it really depends who you talk to about what sort of pressure you may feel. I tried to say that a natural birth was still preferable to a c-sect but no, her friend's had had c-sects and all recovered beautifully.

Sadly Ren that's how some women will always see surgical birth - as a more attractive option to a vaginal birth - until something does go wrong (and it will) to either themselves or their friends.

I thought that Kelly made a good point about the film BOBB. It is great viewing. I know that I came out of that film feeling proud of the job I did. And, I did it all 'wrong', private hospital and private OB! LOL!

The BOBB was a beautiful way to demonstrate the intensity in which we birth our babies, and it doesn't matter if we do it at home, hospital or in the back of a taxi. we should be so proud ourselves. And i love choice! I love the fact that I can choose to birth at home, in a hospital or in a birth centre. I rejoice in the fact that as women we are so awesomely primal beings with untouchable strength to get through birth, be it vaginal or c/s.

What I loved from the BOBB doco the most was the highlighting that we have REAL choices, and in no way are we endangering or sacrificing ourselves or our safety. the fact that the filmmaker tried to birth at home but ended up at hospy as bubs was not in a good way, was beautiful in demonstrating our luckiness in having the right to birth freely, and also our luckiness in having a modern medical system that can save our babies in times of need. THIS gives us real choice.

I guess i agree with most on here that the importance lies in knowing what we want, what we DO NOT want and how best to get there. but as we know the best laid plans of mice and men (especially as babies are concerned! LOL!)...

i wish loads of good luck to all those soon-to-be birthing mummma's out there, you're all champions in my book!

Sorry for your experience, Natty. It sounds scary, and I can understand how you would take comfort in the knowledge that you and your baby are safe. I'm sorry for being judgemental.
Another general thought: I'm wondering if some of the 'pressure' that the OP and obviously so many others are experiencing to have the 'perfect birth' could be because the people applying the 'pressure' have had a bad experience the first time round and are keen to let people know that it doesn't have to be that way. For some, there may be no preventing the need for specialised medical help. That is for sure. But we can learn, through research and through talking to people who've BTDT, some positive steps to try to prevent bad stuff from happening. Its sad that this information can be seen as bullying (and sure, I've no doubt that in some cases it is, even though that's not in my experience).
Here's another choice - you can feel pressured or bullied by others opinions about birth, or you can feel grounded in your own decisions. Personally, the only way I feel grounded in my decisions is if I've explored all the avenues. Having people say to me at the start of my pregnancy that it is 'the worst pain you'll ever experience', or proclaiming the glories of drugs and how I'd be stupid to attempt birth without them, yes, made me cross, but only grounded me in my decision to give it a go. And not only that, but inspired me to set up a strong support network around me, not unlike what Kelly spoke about in a PP (ie the cheersquad).
I'm not sure how many people out there actually don't want to give 'natural' birth a shot. I think most people see that as being desirable (? Or maybe this is only the people I speak to?) But few people actually do research on how to get it, or set up the support they'll need for it to actually happen. Hmm, does that sound like an acurate statement? Perhaps I'm way overgeneralising, but that's how it seems to me.
On a personal note, if it hadn't been for people 'pushing' information on me and encouraging me to look into it, I believe my birth would've been a very different experience to what it was. And it was pretty bloody excellent, I must say. Part of that was luck, and part of it was great support. So my opinion is kind of biased here, because I'm so grateful to those 'pushy' people for providing me with the info I needed to feel grounded in my decisions.

I think its great for people to share their opinions, experiences, research etc. I think what the OP was trying to get at (and I have seen this too, not here on BB but other places on the web) was the implication (sometimes spoken, sometimes silent) that if you choose something different you are somehow less of a mother or less of a woman. I think that is where the bullying part comes in.
Birth is an intensely personal experience and no-one should presume to dictate to someone else how they should have/ should do it. We are very fortunate to have choices and information that can help us make decisions about how we want to give birth. To a degree we will always be flying blind coming into our own first birth experience - no matter what others tell us, how many books we read etc - we just don't know.
Birth is a natural process but things can go wrong. Interventions can be necessary and life-saving. They can also be designed for the convenience of doctors or the legal butt-covering of hospitals. The really hard part is that while you are in labour an intervention that is for convenience or butt-covering might be pushed on you as being life-saving and necessary. And in the midst of the experience, you don't want to take a chance on something happening to your baby. That's why we need to research, share information, support and encourage each other. What we don't need to do is play my birth was better than your birth and therefore I'm a better woman and a better mother than you. Like I said, this is not an attitude I've seen on BB but it's definitely out there.

Wow, women do this? I've only ever been told my birth was better than that person's (as in, the person making the comparison between her and I has said mine was 'better', I don't do comparisons at someone else's expense, as far as I can help it), I've not thought of telling people that myself, and won't be!

Sorry to those who I seem to have offended with my comment about not understanding why anyone would want a drug free birth (it seems I did, I applaud your choice). If you had the birth experience that I did you would understand why I said that. Feel free to read my birth story. Had I not had the drugs I had and the interventions that I did I would never have given birth. The birth experience was not what I expected and it's still very fresh in my mind having only gone through it a month ago. I have not yet reached that place where you seem to forget the pain you went through.

I had originally planned to labour in a bath both at home and at hospital but that became impossible due to the amount of fluid in my feet and legs (could not get out of a bath as my ankles just couldn't take it about 2 weeks before the birth).

I think it's great if you can manage a drug free birth, but it's not always possible. I wish that had been my experience, but it wasn't.

I also think it's great that if you want to go into birth wanting every drug available then that's your choice to do it or if you want to just see how you go with pain that's OK too.

It's all about choice. I think the best thing we can do for our pregnant friends and relatives is to not put any expectations on them. That was certainly my experience and I'm very glad that's how it was for me.

Scooby big :hug: to you. I wasn't upset by your post, i was more worried i'd upset YOU. And i'm sorry you felt picked on on that other site and GLAD you felt able to vent about it here :hug:

Some general things i was thinking when reading:

The biggest drop in maternal deaths in the last 200 years came about with the introduction of soap not surgery. Childbed fever - postpartum infection - was what killed most women, not PPH, not tearing. During the widespread use of forceps about 80 years after their invention (they were a family secret for a good few decades) newborn deaths rose, because inexperienced Obs frequently broke necks and skulls. In the US, the country in which homebirth is illegal in many states, and where children can be removed by child services if a family choose to birth unassisted (not just the newborn, ALL children, even when the baby itself is healthy and no harm came to anyone), and where they have the 2nd highest section rate in the world mortality and morbidity for both women and babies has risen year on year for the past three years.

My cousin is now a hospital paediatrician. During her rotation in obs and gynae after graduation (when they are put to different places for 3-6 months while you decide where they want to make their career) in the first month she saw 49 c-sections, 4 vaginal births, and of those vaginal births 1 (ONE) woman only used gas and sintocin for the third stage. She saw no drug free births. Obs are NOT trained in normal birth the way midwives are.

I have major problems with elective c-sections. They are:

1. is it TRULY elective if the Ob has told the woman that her horrific 1st birth will surely be repeated if she doesn't opt for a section (this has happened to more of my friends than i can count).

2. why is it a woman can choose major abdominal surgery when i can't just walk into the doctor's and tell him i want heart medication, insulin and valium?

I have one friend who is an Ob. She's a great patient-centred doctor and if i was having a preemie, twins or some other more risky situation i would consider her care. She works about 60 hours a week, much of that in theatre. She has endless paperwork to do on top of pre-natal appointments, consultations with midwives on medium-risk patients, surgery, inductions and ward rounds. You might wonder then when she finds the time to read current medical studies to keep up to date on the newest figures, risks and findings... SHE DOESN'T. She has actually laughed at me before and said "You know more than me!" about Foley inductions because her hospital only uses medication for cervical ripening...

I support a woman's right to make her own choices, but "my Ob will know" is NOT a choice, it's a default. If it goes wrong it MIGHT be the ob's fault, but it is the woman and the baby who have to carry the consequences.

Bx

I wasn't going to get into the childbed fever/puerpal fever implication for neonatal death until clean communal (read: hospital) birthing environments could be achieved, but I'm so glad you did, Bec!
And I do know of OB's who are prepared to sit and support without doing anything...they are far and few between and all that I've heard of have been elderly, trained in bedside manner. It's not a new school trait, I"m afraid.
Anyway, I love the way MR put it :)

:

---

I have one friend who is an Ob. She's a great patient-centred doctor and if i was having a preemie, twins or some other more risky situation i would consider her care. She works about 60 hours a week, much of that in theatre. She has endless paperwork to do on top of pre-natal appointments, consultations with midwives on medium-risk patients, surgery, inductions and ward rounds. You might wonder then when she finds the time to read current medical studies to keep up to date on the newest figures, risks and findings... SHE DOESN'T. She has actually laughed at me before and said "You know more than me!" about Foley inductions because her hospital only uses medication for cervical ripening...

Bx

---

And this is where alot of the temptation for inductions and caesareans comes into play with OB's as well. They don't have the time anymore for the unexpected, and they don't have the energy to be out of bed all night at a birth - and front up to their office for consults in the morning.

I'm not a fan of OB's but working with birthing women myself - going out at all hours, not knowing when I'll be home, not knowing when the phone is going to ring - I do understand where this need to schedule things and put some predictability into what is essentially the most unpredictable event there is, comes from. I only work with a couple of women at a time, doing a couple of births a month and sometimes it turns my life upside down for days at a time. I just had a birth last week where I was back and forth between the mother's home, the hospital and my house around the clock for 4 days. I can't imagine how it must be for them, working in the office all day and being on call for dozens of women at any one time.

BUT that is no excuse for the situation we find ourselves in now - too many caesareans, too many inductions and too much intervention in general. If obstetricians only had to deal with the small number of women who need their skills - they could manage the load better, balance their lives better and women and babies would be better off to boot.

:

---

And I do know of OB's who are prepared to sit and support without doing anything...they are far and few between and all that I've heard of have been elderly, trained in bedside manner. It's not a new school trait, I"m afraid.

---

I agree Mayaness. Every hands off OB I have come across (and I had one in the public hospital for my first birth actually) was very old school, trained years ago before all these interventions were commonplace, and have what is fundamentally a "midwifery" view of birth. But sadly, they are a dying breed. And those replacing them are being trained in a completely different way. :(

Women preparing to birth their babies should be as informed as possible about their choices, and then "back" themselves in their decision. I'd also suggest that some women preparing for labour should cover their ears with their hands and loudly sing "la la la" whenever birthing opinions are offered. Where birth is concerned, anyone who's done it has got an opinion, and if you don't want to hear it ... well, I've offered my advice on what to do.

IMO not enough women trust themselves in their decisions where labour is concerned. But I think that any woman who "goes with the flow" and relies on the Ob to do the right thing, is doing herself a disservice. Obs are great whenever there's a problem with birth, but they're a bit too handy at offering alternatives to a natural birth too. I think Obs are valued people in the medical profession, and God knows they have saved many mums and babies (ditto c-sections) ... but how many Obs are happy to sit back during the birth of a baby and let mum take control of her birth? Not too many, I'd suspect. They're paid lots of money, so it stands to reason they want to DO something during a birth. My Ob was a lovely person and did show support for my drug-free, intervention free plan ... but she couldn't help but add her medical two cents worth during our consults - and why shouldn't she, it was what I was paying her for. I decided to keep on going to my Ob, but realised early on that I had to stick to my guns and follow my head and heart where my intention for a natural birth was concerned. And yep, there was a bit of ear covering and "la la la" going on for me.

As the thread has gone beyond the questions posed in the OP, I'd like to add my experience. I was adamant I wanted a drug-free, intervention free birth. For whatever reason, Dh and I chose to go with an Ob and a private hospital (mainly because of the years I've been paying into priv. health insurance). Yes, some women at work said "go with the drugs blah blah" ... you can imagine what I did (hands on ears, etc). Anyway, to achieve the birth we wanted, DH and I did our best to inform ourselves, including a hypnobirthing course and lots or reading on natural birthing. The night I birthed my son, I went to hospital for a check after my waters had broken, and ignoring advice, I went home again to establish labour (at the time I was less than 2cm dilated but all was perfectly A-OK with bub and I). Just three hours later I returned to hospital and within 90 mins DS was born - no drugs, no intervention. All the Ob did was tell me how to push properly (in that, she did me an excellent service!). My point ... I backed myself. I felt if I'd stayed in hospital at less than 2cm dilated, I was in "their" hands ... not mine. As it happened, my son's heart rate dropped a bit during contractions, if I'd stayed in hospital and been constantly monitored, I honestly think I would've ended up with intervention - much against my better judgement. I heard afterwards that it's perfectly normal for bub's heart rates to drop during contractions.

My natural birth was a wonderful experience and I'm forever amazed that I was up and walking around just a half hour or so after the birth. Trusting my body, and going home to establish my labour helped me achieve my aim. Look, there is a place for intervention, drugs and c-sections ... of course there is. But the vast majority of we women were built to birth babies. Not all, but most. Unfortunately a large percentage don't trust their bodies to birth effectively.

Sorry, I've written a thesis. This is such an emotive topic, but I personally feel there are too many stories of horrid birthing experiences, birthing "pain", the need for drugs in birth etc etc. No wonder it scares/unnerves many women. Those of us who have had a good, natural birthing experience are keen to shout it from the rooftops in the hope that we can empower other women to give natural birthing a red hot shot.

To Sophiebear ... you're probably exasperated and maddened by the controversy your OP has caused on BB. However, your curiosity should be appeased to some extent. But if nothing else, I hope you can understand why so many have chosen to comment. Natural, drugs, c-section ... whatever the case, make your birth yours and own it.

Andie

Hi Natty, after reading your posts it sounds like your my type of gal :lol:
Thanks for making me feel that it's ok to choose a priavte hospital and an ob. I am most comfortable with that especially for my first baby and believe me i have taken many years to decide which path to take so i believe it's an informed decision. I would like to have a doula as well and thanks for everyone's advice i will interview some others and see if i can get one i gel with better. I think i can probably guess which hospital you work at and i would love to know more about what it's like to deliver there, just excited about when i do. I think i am definately going to try to go with Dr Gubbay, do you know much about him??? :hug: