I've just got back from my growth scan, due to worries that bub is too big. I'm 35 weeks today, and he's already measuring 3.2kgs, and a lot of the measurements I saw coming up were over 38 weeks. I'm so torn. I know the scan can be wrong. I know my midwife won't want me to go too far overdue, as DD was 4.2kgs at 41w5d. I don't want a huge baby, and I don't want to go overdue like last time, but I don't want induction either
Oh Teeki that's tough. I can't offer any useful advice except I know so many women who were confidently told they would give birth to big babies but when they were born they were not as big as they were supposed to be. Is there a 'limit' or deadline of days being overdue you could settle on with your midwife and the doctors? Something you feel comfortable with? And in the meantime read up on lots of positive induction stories in mental preparation?
I was told all along that my babe was big.. She was born 9lb2oz.. I went into labour on my own but then needed to be induced.. Were you induced with your DD?
Yes, I was induced at 11 days over with DD. It wasn't bad, I just really want to experience a totally natural birth and this is my last baby. I don't want to get that far again and have no choice.
I saw my midwife last Thursday and she said even though fundal measurements have always been big he doesn't actually palp big. So I think she was thinking it might just be a small difference. She said they'd start with s&s at 40 weeks, but I'm worried if she thinks he's DD's size at 38 weeks she'll want to start earlier. Then I'm worried the scan isn't dead on accurate, and if I go ahead and do something early he'll be small/right on average and it'll have been for nothing.
I had 2 growth scans 24w and 30 oddw as ob was convinced DD was big going on fundal measurements. My 20 weeks scan she did measure slightly bigger as she did in my other scans.
My DD arrived at 41weeks at 6 pound 1.... Go figure!
I think, I'm happy to keep going with nothing but at s&s at 40 weeks. I'll keep hoping he slows down a bit and do my best to get him engaged and ready to go, but I really don't want anything before 40 weeks.
This bub is measuring big as well. I also have a high level of fluid, though it was in the normal range at 34wks. I'm fully expecting a 4kg+ bub. That part doesn't phase me. Neither DH or I are small people. My issue is I don't want to go much past 39 weeks, because I'm in a lot of pain and struggling to cope emotionally. I also don't want an induction, but we'll work that out closer to the time.
what is your main concern? Size, timing or possible induction?
Are the measurements on length? My ds was so long at birth: 55 cm but was only 3.5 kg which was the same weight as dd who was only 51cm. He had a smaller head too and it was a lovely birth. As arimeh says, tall kids might measure big inside but doesn't mean they are 'big' babies.
My midwife thinks your body grows the baby to the perfect size and then the eject button is activated! Both mine were 3.5kg and one at 38w next one at 40w. You might find you go into labour earlier than last time if he's big, but you have done it before, so I would put faith in your body.
I would view the scan measurements with caution. My bridesmaid gave birth to her 'huge' baby at 39 weeks last month. He was 7lb6 - had she got to 40 weeks he would have still been in the 'normal' range.
It's really just an estimate of size, the baby is scrunched up in there so it's far from a perfectly accurate measurement
my second baby was almost 5kg, and 1.3 kg more than my first, but was a much easier labour and birth. he was in a better position, I was free to move around and my Labour was not induced /augmented. so, larger baby does not necessarily mean harder birth.
I am still hoping that #3 is not bigger than DS though.
Thanks everyone. After reading the replies, talking to DH and having a good think, I think I'm more concerned about induction than a bigger baby. DD was 9lp5.5oz and I had no tears or anything. This time I do trust my midwife and she's so much more supportive than the rotating staff I had last time. She knows how much I want to avoid induction, and knows I can birth a bigger baby well.
So, I think I'm ok to just take these measurements with a grain of salt (I've only been given the weight estimate, no idea about height or how she got to that guess). And I'm happy to do nothing until 40 weeks and then only the minimum. I don't think I'll be pressured into anything which was my first concern. But I'll be working on sitting correctly, good posture, and will check out spinning babies again to get him in a good position - anything to help him along on his own!
L&B, I'm interested to hear about fluid levels too. My midwife said he doesn't feel big when she feels around for him, so I always thought the "extra" could have been fluid or just the extra weight I carry (unfortunately there is a bit).
This might be a stupid thought, but would it be very bad to start epo now at 35 weeks rather than 36, to help my cervix get ready?
I think EPO would be fine to start now. are you taking RLT as well? Also, once you hit term I would look into massage if you can. I had a session that really helped my DD3 with position and the lady doing the prenatal massage said that if i wanted we could put together a program where she slowly builds towards a full induction massage close to term. I wasnt interested as all my babies tend to be short bakers anyway, but i thought it was a cool option nonetheless and might be worth considering
I've been taking the RLT for a while now, and might start the epo tonight. DH will be happy, he keeps asking when he can do that
Cassius, I'll look into if there's someone/somewhere here that does that kind of massage. I only know of one acupuncture place and don't know that I'd go there, even if I could bring myself to voluntarily have needles put in me lol.
I really just wish my appointment was sooner now, I might call tomorrow afternoon and see if the midwife has any thoughts on the results. The bonus of a one on one program I guess!
I was told DS1 and 2 would be giant babies. I had mild polyhydramniosis (excess fluid) with DS1 and he was a fairly big boy born too, at 4.1kg, but no where near the 5kg the doctor 'warned' me he would be. DS2 was also fairly big, at 3.9kg, but by no means abnormally large. They were both very long though, at 56cm and 57.5cm respectively, so I think part of why they were thinking they would be huge is because they were so tall.
Registered User
Baby is measuring big - needing reassurance :(
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks