Induction and C/S aren't always bad
I love this forum.
I have gained wonderful knowledge and support here but I just have to type this.
The advocates for natural and non-medicalised birth hurt my feelings a lot.
Here is my story.
I fell pg at 40 to find myself ready to give birth for the first time when I was overweight but fit and healthy at 41. I was absolutely worried about giving birth at the tertiary hospital but our local hospital would not allow me to deliver there with my high BMI and because I was older. I was classified as "high risk" and cared for by the FMU at the tertiary hospital.
I understood my rights and I kept putting off the offered induction. at 41 weeks pg I went into the hospital for a check-up and discussion about an induction in two days to find my baby's heartbeat had stopped and she had died. Had I not resisted the induction I would have a living breathing 2 1/2 yr old with me now. So much for the specialised care helping!
I was induced to give birth to my dead baby. The induction was not the terrible labour we are constantly warned about but quite gentle and I had very little drugs which considering I was delivering a baby I knew wouldn't move or breathe was not too bad.
Having taken 8 years to get pg the first time I doubted we would get pg again but against all odds and with help with timing from a good FS we concieved our DS.
As my first baby had died at 41 weeks we were supported in our decision to induce this baby early 38 weeks 3 days.
The wonderful staff at the FMU tried everything to support me having another VB but with a living baby this time. My breech baby was turned twice by one of the obs......he turned back the first time! Then after he was turned the second time they tried to induce me with a ballon system (can't remember the fancy name for it!).
This didn't work and I ended up with a VERY scary emergency C/S.
Both births were scary and frightening.
My point is that I could have saved my DD's life if I'd accepted the offered induction at 40 weeks and I could have prevented the scary emergency C/S if I'd accepted a c/s was a good idea to deliver my DS early instead of trying for the live VB.
I do understand people are bullied into births they don't want but I wish I hadn't stood my guns like I did and I wish I hadn't known about my rights. I would not have two babies not just one in my arms and I would not have been a stuttering, shaking, terrified mess when my son was born because the C/S could have been better explained and managed and I could have had time to demand immediate skin on skin instead I had a distressed baby boy.
Perhaps sometimes these OB's DO know what they are talking about.
Induction and C/S aren't always bad
I am do sorry for your experiences Kateo and the loss of your baby.
Induction and C/S aren't always bad
If you're comfortable with your own choices then other people's opinions should slide off of you like water off a ducks back. As a PP said, we as individuals are the only ones who have to live with our decisions.
Induction and C/S aren't always bad
Kateo, please don't be so hard in yourself hun. You said yourself that your DD's passing was unexplained. At the end of the day, there's no way you can know whether the outcome would have been different if you were induced, it very well may have been the same. Some things we just don't know. Please do not blame yourself :hug:
Induction and C/S aren't always bad
I am so sorry for your loss Kateo.
And thank you for sharing.
I have been part of the decision making teams
To intervene on the high risk pregnancy and get it right you unfortunately have to intervene sometimes when things would have been ok. The science is far far from perfect. BUT there is science. Guidelines like inducing before 42 weeks are actually evidenced based. The best evidence we can get. But it's not perfect. And some people will be fine... And some won't. You just can't tell which ones are which.
Having been there to support women just like you give birth to their beautiful sleeping angels I can no longer participate actively in this forum due to comments about intervention .
It affects you deeply and forever when you are involved in baby loss.
Most times doctors, midwives, mums, dads are just trying to get it right. Truly and really, trying to avoid the immense heartache and pain that you have suffered.
Hugest hugs to you. I carry you with me having "met" you on this forum and read your beautiful poetry. I carry you with me in mind with the women I have cared for in real life, I am sure this makes me a little more likely to suggest induction in certain situations. And I think that's ok.
Xx
Induction and C/S aren't always bad
:
I know that sometimes my own experiences cloud my perspective and sometimes I react to things that really don't concern me because I fear that others will experience what I did.
Exactly right. I do the same thing. For one, I regularly tell people about my induction with Amelia and how much I regret agreeing to it. I don't want anyone to go in thinking it's going to be sunshine and daisies, when it's anything but. I also usually - not always - add that Ianto's birth, an induction as well as a stillbirth, was a fairly good birth aside from the outcome. I'd change some things about it, yes, but I'm not as mentally scarred as I am by Amelia's.
But I also hold my breath and wish every woman could just skip the 32-week mark, because that was when Ianto died. That doesn't mean I expect their babies to die that week, just as I don't expect every induction to go badly. It just means I'm projecting my own fears onto their pregnancies or births.
Induction and C/S aren't always bad
I'm so sorry to hear about your beautiful girl
Induction and C/S aren't always bad
Sorry for the loss of your precious daughter kateo.
I think luluhb said it perfectly and I don't have much more to add. Hopefully women read about these different stories (none of which are right or wrong) and how to educate themselves on childbirth.
Induction and C/S aren't always bad
Hugs kateo. And thank you. For being brave and speaking out. For sharing about your beautiful angel daughter. Thank you.
I agree not all interventions are bad. I have been in the position of needing them.
With my first I developed Pre-eclampsia and had to be induced at 37 weeks for my sake and baby's (as it was the doctors let me go as long as they could, I had been under observation for nearly 2 months before being induced)
With my second My waters broke but labour didn't start naturally so they gave me a synto drip to kick start things.
My third was prem (33weeks) spontaneous labour. Luckily I was in hospital because I'd had a show the day before.
My fourth tried to come prem but with medication and rest we managed to keep him in until 38 weeks. The night he was born I knew he would come then. Early labour started 7pm, was 5 min apart by 9pm but was only mild. Decided to go into hospital anyway. Baby's heart rate drop while I was hooked up to CTG. I was only 3-4cm dilated and he wasn't fully engaged yet. His heart rate drop dangerously 6-8 or more times in the next few hours. Because he was fully engaged my labour wasn't progressing and there was a real danger of him becoming distressed. So first they broke the waters, well that only helped a little. Then about 3am the doctor hooked me up to a synto drip. That got things going properly! Baby was born 4:18am with the cord around his neck (that was what had been causing the issues). If the doctors hadn't offered me the interventions I might not have my precious 12 week old baby here with me now.
And the funny thing is my dream/ideal birth would have been a water homebirth.......
So I envy those of you who can go through pregnancy and labour without any issues, I salute those who have held on to their ideals, and I understand those who have needed life saving interventions.
Induction and C/S aren't always bad
I'm sorry for your loss and want to thank you for sharing.