Twilight being banned in schools!!

[Nelle]

I always figured Twilight was an early teen thing and less a pre-teen thing? Could be totally wrong though, not having read it myself.

I guess I interpret these decisions as a control thing. If there is a school where some/many parents want to discourage their children from certain books until they hit high school, then perhaps asking children not to bring those books to school is sensible. I mean, we're always talking about parents taking responsibility for the media/content their children interact with, so if a parent decides their child shouldn't read something til year 7 then I guess that needs to be respected.

[Floweryfields]

Yes I agree - it should be the parent's choice, what they believe is acceptable for their child to read. I think there is a big difference to the books being available in the library (though the age probably should be limited for certain books) than say, if the teacher were using it as a class novel that everyone had to read.

[Chocaholic]

Quite frankly, I don't mind if the library at school is banning them. I think it is a parental thing to determine what books are appropriate and if the child wants to read a certain book and it is not available at the school, then ask their parents and surely mum or dad could take them to the local library or purchase the book if the child is that interested.

TBH I very rarely read books from my school library as they didn't appeal to me. My mum would take me to the local library at least once a fortnight to exchange the books I had checked out. It was a great mother/daughter experience as it always turned into a coffee/hot chocolate chat session.

[krysalyss]

I think banning books is quite controversial in any regards. But I have to say I don't really think it is suitable for primary school children mostly due to the amount of sexual references, but also due to the violence in the book although I wouldn't pinpoint it just to violence against women but there is certainly detailed violence in there. Although I wouldnt support banning I also wouldn't go and recommend it to a pre-teen. Just my opinion.

[Roryrory]

virginia andrews "flowers in the attic" which was available from my private, catholic, all girls school library!

LOL Flowers in the Attic was hot property at my all-girls Anglican private school - you had to be on the waiting list (I bet no one at the school ever read it). Tweens will always want slightly racy stuff. As for the violence part, I've not read the books but it sounds pretty mild. IMO a girl will grow up to think violence against women is ok she sees her dad beat up her mum, not if she reads about a rough kiss in a fantasy novel. I bet every girl who read flowers in the attic didn't race out thinking it was ok to sleep with her brother.

Although I wouldnt support banning I also wouldn't go and recommend it to a pre-teen. Just my opinion.

This is the crux of it though - aren't they talking about not having it at a primary school library? I would say I'd support that, because 12 year olds might be up for it but I don't personally think 10 year olds should be reading about fictionalised sex (unless we are talking about a 10 year old who has been abused and her therapist has recommended that she read a particular fictional book which might help her deal with what had happened to her). Personally I am pretty repulsed by the overt sexualisation of young girls - sure 10 year olds are sexual creatures - all humans are - but I see pre-teens reading Twighligh just part of the same continum which sees 6 year olds wearing mini-bras and high heels. My stepbrother's wife is looking for a g-string for her 8 year old - that is just wrong IMO....

[AnyDream]

My feeling is that they're not so appropriate in the primary school context - better suited to a high school age group. This doesn't mean they should be actively "banned" though. In the school context this comes down to the teacher librarian selecting the titles that are most suitable in content and interest for a range of readers of varying ages at that school. A good rule of thumb is the age of the central characters...isn't Bella 16 at the start of the series? That places these books well out of the context of the average 10-12 year old's experience. Also reflected in the movie adaptation's rating, which was M and not a PG.

My DD (11) has expressed an interest in reading these but I have told her she can wait a couple of years and enjoy them then. None of her peers have read it either (but I think a few have older siblings who have read them or seen the movie so it's seen as very cool).

ETA - ugh Rory the gstring thing is soooo wrong!! Why why why???

[leckert]

In the school context this comes down to the teacher librarian selecting the titles that are most suitable in content and interest for a range of readers of varying ages at that school. A good rule of thumb is the age of the central characters...isn't Bella 16 at the start of the series? That places these books well out of the context of the average 10-12 year old's experience. Also reflected in the movie adaptation's rating, which was M and not a PG.

MD, as a Teacher Librarian (TL for short) I pretty much stick to that guideline age of characters as to what age is likely to be okay to stock in the library. I have worked in a R-12 school setting and in 8-12 school settings. I actually ummed and ahhed over actually getting the series into my high school where I currently work (okay on mat leave from). I wasn't so keen on getting the whole series (I haven't read them - no time so far) but had heard/read reviews that meant I wasn't keen on getting book 4 in but the bookseller I got the first 3 from accidentally gave me book 4 instead of book 1 and I only realised after it was processed so ended up with the whole series. I was lucky in the end that it was just Yr 10-12s that actually wanted to read the series and had asked for it to gotten in. I wouldn't have allowed access to it by students under Yr 9 in the R-12 school that I worked at. They have separate collections for R-3, 3-9, 10-12. Students can read down but not up (the Yr 8/9s can if they have parental permission). I would have been putting the twilight series in the oldest collection.
I don't think it's appropriate for a primary school library.

[CrazyLady]

The author wrote the books to be pg rated so that her child and child's friends could read it. I feel that the series is far more appropriate then majority of the teenage aimed literature out there.

Also, didn't schools want to ban Harry Potter due to the use of "witchcraft"?

So what's to stop kids going to the local library and borrowing from there? Are local libraries going to ask students for proof of age to borrow these books?