Lets talk about weetbix.

[~clover~]

Mine all ate weet bix from 6 months. DD2 especially. Still loves it. I actually never heard the over 12 months til I mentioned it in here. By then 2 kids were past that stage & DS was in the middle of it. Weet bix & avocado sandwiches were his main foods when we started solids.

DH was started on weet bix at a very young age too. Didn't hurt him

[~Raven~]

Thats a great post. I also tried to find the "not under 12 months" recommendation, on the box and on the website, but never did
!

But it does say clearly on the box and on the website that it is for kids ages 1 - 7 years. Can that be interpreted as not being suitable for under 12 months? Does it really have to say in big bold letter that it isn't suitable I read it and think well my child isn't 1 yet so I'm not going to feed it the him/her just yet, or is that just me.


I swear I have found it on the sanitarium site that it's not recommended to give wheat to babies under 6 months. Weet-bix is made from wheat, therefore it must be unsuitable...again is that just my interpretation? They don't say it in so many words but in a round about way.

Didn't bookmark it and I really can't be bothered trawling through all the pages on there to find it now lol.

Anyhoo that's a great read Falgs, thanks for sharing!

[Junglemum]

The quote on the box is ;

"Weet-Bix Kids with 1/2 cup of milk provides 1/3 of daily calcium & iron needs of children aged 1-7 years."

I don't interpret that to mean not for kids under 12 months at all. Kids under 12 months have a different calcium and iron need to those over 12 months. So the statement would not be true if it said from 6 months. I don't think it was intended to mean only children between 1 and 7 should have them.

You are right, the website does say that cereal and grains shouldn't be introduced until 7 months. It's on the sanitarium site under nutrition, the article is "Healthy foods, healthy babies...a guide to introducing solids to babies." But there is nothing to say that you should hold off until 12 months.

Roryrory- i think it was a swedish study, the main point i took from the study was the importance of BF'ing when introducing wheat. Apparently that was what helped lower the incidence of coeliac disease.

[Indadhanu]

Are you talking about kids weetbix or normal weetbix? I would expect it to be on the normal weetbix at least, which I don't think has any kind of recommendation?

Kids under 12 months have a different calcium and iron need to those over 12 months.

Thats how I would read it too... same as kids over 7 could eat it, but it wouldn't give them 1/3 of their daily calcium and iron needs.

ETA doesn't matter, i re-read, yes Weetbix Kids I just have the normal one. I didn't even know there WAS a Weetbix Kids one until a few weeks ago actually...

ETA again: By delayed, I always thought 'delayed' usually meant 12 months +... since the recommendations are not to even start solids until 6 months, I'd assume you wouldn't feed them foods that cause common allergies (that didn't come out right but YKWIM) before that anyway. Thats what gets me confused, because people say "delayed" which I would think it not at the age when you are typically starting solids (6 months)... I'd think it would be at least 9 months or longer, but teething rusks are typically wheat based...?

[Olive]

awesome info ange!!

just wanted to add taht the aldi weetbix has 84mg, just if anyone is interested

[Janie]

Well, I used up the last of our Vitabrits, and have bought some Weetbix. Although I forgot about the kids one and bought the organic. Never mind, will get the kiddie box next time . I'm trying to be much more concious of DS's sodium intake these days.