thread: Slow Cookers - 3.5 L or 6 L?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Dec 2005
    In Bankworld with Barbara
    14,222

    Get the bigger one as a smaller one is useless for doing a chook, lamb shanks or a leg of lamb/roast beef/silverside. Slow cooking is so much more than just casseroles, soups and stews these days and you will get more benefit in the long run from a larger one. There is also the benefit of having leftovers you can freeze if you just don't feel like cooking one night or need something quick and easy to get out of the freezer. That said I would also like a 3.5lt one myself so I can do desserts.

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Sep 2005
    In the middle of nowhere
    9,362

    :yeahthat:
    exactly what I was going to say