thread: Whats the max you'd spend on a handbag?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Mar 2004
    Sparta
    12,662

    $300 isn't a lot for a classic bag that you will get a lot of use out of.

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Jan 2008
    3,305

    wow weee im envious i wouldn't and cant justify more than 20 dollars .

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Sep 2008
    South West Vic
    275

    ive paid alot more than that for a chanel bucket handbag which wasnt even vintage lol

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Jun 2005
    Perth
    1,454

    The most I have spent is $350 on a Kenneth Cole handbag when on holiday in Dubai a couple of years ago - I saw it in the shop, walked past it a couple of times and then just had to have it. I love it tho and am so pleased with my purchase. I would spend up to $500 unless of course I had a HUGE disposable income then I suppose money is no limit.

    But in answer to your question, I think that amount sounds reasonable.

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Mar 2008
    North Northcote
    8,065

    as to how much i would spend on a handbag...how long is a piece of string LOL! i have been known to spend *amounts* of money on items that i love. if you have the cash, or at least if it's not a pinch, then i'd say go for it. especially if it is the real deal!

    my DH and I spend $ on good basics as we were in the fortunate position to do so (not so much now that i have no paid employment ) and we both agree that those we have forked out extra for have lasted the distance a whole lot better. so yeah, sure i have paid loads of money on gucci or prada shoes...but they have lasted the distance, i wear them all the time and they still look great! would i buy gucci sunnies? prolly not, as they are known for their leather and i know the quality of the shoes are good.

    tell your DH that it is an 'investment for future savings' LOL!

  6. #6
    BellyBelly Member

    Mar 2007
    Perth
    2,088

    I could justify spending $300, but like you said, I couldnt justify spending any more than that! I have so many fakes from Malaysia & a couple in particular I get many comments on.

  7. #7
    Registered User

    Feb 2006
    Newcastle, NSW
    4,219

    If I loved it, and I knew it wouldn't be putting my family out in anyway, I would spend $300 on a bag for sure!

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Add fionas on Facebook

    Apr 2007
    Recently treechanged to Woodend, VIC
    3,473

    If you'd asked me a few years ago, I would have said no way but I reckon I've bought a lot of handbags under $100 that have broken so these days I pay a bit more - generally between $2-300 and generally from Witchery. I'm a bit more blase about it these days because I only spend that much on handbags that will last a long time and that I will use a lot. I wouldn't spend that much on an 'occasion' bag eg. for a wedding that I'm only likely to use a few times.

  9. #9
    Registered User

    Apr 2008
    The Purple House, Sydney
    1,811

    Holy moley Here I was thinking my $100 baby bag was 'spensive. That's the most I've ever spent on a bag.

    However, bags just aren't my thing. I once spent nearly $600 on a vintage magician's box that i knew I was never going to actually use (the thought of taking it to a kid's party just scared me too much, and it was too small for stage) cause that is my thing. And I bought it just to look at! If you love it and want it and know you will get use (or viewing pleasure) out of it, go for it. I say it's a good investment.

  10. #10
    Registered User

    Mar 2009
    2,269

    I probably wouldn't spend more than ~$70 on a handbag but I did spend close to $300 on my nappy bag which I now use as my handbag!