Ryn the "real" women on the sites are ALL shapes and sizes. Actually look.

I don't get why you're upset about this, there ARE women on there who have magazine-like figures, breasts, bums, faces, as well as other areas which aren't what the media would present at all, and women who have NO body parts who are magazine pretty and are nonetheless beautiful. There are big boobs, small boobs, tiny boobs, non existant boobs, perky boobs, saggy boobs, round boobs, long boobs, wide-spaced boobs, smooshed together boobs, symmetric boobs, assymetric boobs, gigiantic nipples, tiny nipples, pre and post nursing boobs, you name it. There are big bellies with masses of stretchies and section scars, flat toned bellies without a blemish, tiny waists, big waists, taut skin, apron bellies, big bums, tiny bums, toned bums, saggy bums, fat backs, skinny backs, bony chests, chubby chests, there are women who could have been pages in a fashion magazine with the head cut off (they're mainly anon pics), and women who say they spend their entire lives hiding under massive clothes because they feel so ugly. Every one of those women is real, and none is more real than the rest. The point of the sites is the diversity of normal reality, NOT that skinny women who happen to be the same shape as those in the magazines aren't real or worthy in some way. I seriously suggest you go and have a look, no one is left out, there is every type on there. Within 3 pages of boobs i'd found several sets JUST like mine, despite me feeling compared to my non-mummy friends i have huge misshapen saggy ones - many of those women hadn't had babies yet! It just shows a more realistic vision of womanhood, it does NOT exclude the media-friendly looking women from that vision.

Bx