Coincidence or a bit of proof?

[jellybean88]

Ds gets rashes when I take his off but it takes about a month to get working again if its been off for a while
I figure it can't be placebo because placebo doesn't work on babies

[LuluHB]

I was pretty sure there was nothing to it but I put it on DD3 around 6 months out of sheer desperation. Then a couple of weeks ago I took it off her for the first time because she had gastro and I know I hate stuff constricting me in any way when I'm sick. Left it off her for a couple of days and even after the gastro had cleared she was still a grumpy little maggot. Put it back on and within 36 hours she was much happier again. Could have been pure coincidence but I'm not taking it off again any time soon, just in case ;-)

[Kazzo]

I put it back on her last night. She has been upset and clingy all week and after reading the comments on here about change in their LO thought I would see too. Will see over the weekend. She loved having it back on though so either way I told her as long as it stays out of her mouth and she does not bite it then she can keep it on.

[kitten2b]

I can always tell when DS does not have his on, a very cranky baby and nappy rash to boot, with it on within a few hours a happy baby returns.

[Cassius2]

we also can tell when we take it off. especially when they are younger. DD2 was crazy unsettled but with the necklace on she was alot calmer. like PP have mentioned, the two times that i took it off there was a noticeable difference in her ability to cope and calmness.

I have one for DD3 but she is just sooo chillaxed that I havent put it on yet (and as RCC mentioned it just looks way too big ATM).

[DaydreamBeliever]

Our dd had hers on her wrist and had had it on for 3 months. I took it off and she got very restless while teething. I found her tooth had cut so popped it back on and she was like a different bub. 2nd tooth is cutting now. I really believe in them.