Consecutive babies bigger than older siblings?

**Pretty Butterfly** · March 4th, 2008, 10:47 AM

Jayden.. 7lb 6oz
Taylah.....6lb
Mason ...8lb 10oz
Zavier....8lb 4oz
Kane.....8lb 13oz
All right on full term.

**~Raven~** · March 4th, 2008, 10:51 AM

Mason was 7lb8oz and 51cm
Angus was 7lb2oz and 49cm
Caleb was 7lb8oz and 53cm.

Not much difference really!

**alioops** · March 4th, 2008, 11:05 AM

DD1 was 7lb13oz
DD2 was 7lb6oz
DD1 was 9 days overdue, DD2 was 3 days overdue. They were the same length and i cant remember about the HC.

**Trillian** · March 4th, 2008, 11:19 AM

Cricket, it's interesting to hear you mention your weight gain during pg - I was the opposite and put on less weight with my biggest and the most weight with my smallest. For me even their length increased with their size too.

**Liz** · March 4th, 2008, 11:31 AM

hmm.. there needs to be a 'second baby was bigger than the first'... coz the first option makes it sound like I have lots of babies! hehe

I know you wanted full term babies.. but I figure mine counts even tho she was prem LOL.

DS was 6lb at 37 weeks
DD was 7lb 14oz at 34 weeks

bit scared if we go for #3 and it's full term! LOL

**Bathsheba** · March 4th, 2008, 11:38 AM

Yep, my births confirm the theory that each baby gets bigger.

DD 7'10" born at 42 weeks
DS 8'8" born at 41 weeks
DS 9'0 born at 37 weeks (that was amazing!)