have just printed this off to hand to MCHN when she gives me the 3rd degree about our decision to not vaccinate again! thanks Kelly
Registered User
have just printed this off to hand to MCHN when she gives me the 3rd degree about our decision to not vaccinate again! thanks Kelly
Registered User
Yes the RotaTeq is 3 doses and this is the one on the schedule.
Before it was on the schedule it was an optional extra vax that you had to pay for yourself at the GP and then claim back, which is what I did for DS. Some GPs had RotaTeq, others had Rotarix, which was only 2 doses.
I am, generally speaking, pro-vax, but I can't deny that I am feeling a little like I've dodged a bullet on this one and only because my own GP had done their due diligence, decided that RotaTeq was the better vaccine and chose to administer it over the Rotarix.
BellyBelly Member
ok, i admit i only skimmed that.. but didnt it say although it showed up there was the virus in there it hasnt harmed anyone?
Registered User
I thought in QLD there was only 2 doses, so maybe they use that one?
Glad I didn't get it anyway.
♥ BellyBelly's Creator ♥
But aren't you concerned this is supposed to be a sterile vaccination made by one of the massive pharma companies and it's contaminated? What else could get in there? If a pig virus could contaminate an entire vaccine, firstly thats a massive error in part of the maker, but who knows what else could have gotten in there... which is why I would rather not take risks. My daughter had the virus, it was horrible... my son never got it... but I still would not put in a russian roulette of who knows what in their little bodies. Someone posted on FB too that their child had a bad reaction to the vaccine and ended up in hospital for 2 days...
Kelly xx
Creator of BellyBelly.com.au, doula, writer and mother of three amazing children
Registered User
Which is why i'm glad I have educated myself on the dangers of vaccines before I had kids and got them vaccinated. I used to be very pro-vaccine but now i'm the total opposite- it's a shame though unless you educate yourself on the dangers you'd otherwise never no.
Things get contaminated all the time, people make mistakes... a can of bakes beans in your cupboard could be contaminated right now.
Yes its scarey for a vaxer, but i'd be just as scared if my medication was contaminated. But it wouldn't make me suddenly decide it wasn't worth the risk to take my medication anymore!
People who decide to vax don't take the decision lightly and i know i genuinely believe the benefits outweigh the risks.
Yes its great to educate and warn people of the dangers of vaxing, but i hope non-vaxers are just breathing a sigh of relief rather than trying to re-inforce that their decision not to vax was the right one....... because its a personal choice to vax, there is no right or wrong.
Registered User
Heaven DDs 2&3 had the 3 dose one. I think Australia uses Rotateq
♥ BellyBelly's Creator ♥
Two rotavirus vaccines are licensed for use in Australia: Rotarix® (GlaxoSmithKline); and; RotaTeq® (CSL Limited/Merck and Co, Inc).
Kelly xx
Registered User
my son has had it he had the rotateq, 3 doses.
I think the decision to vaccinate or not is very personal amd emotional.
I do worry about whats in them, but also about what could happen if they arent vaccinated, and at the end of the day its a really difficult choise to make.
Registered User
"what could happen if they arent vaccinated"
You should be extremely concerned about what will happen, if not now, but in years to come.
The term “immunization” (US, Canada) or "immunisation" (UK, Australia, NZ), often substituted for the term "vaccination", is false and should not be used in place of "vaccination", because it is well documented in medical research that vaccination, the direct injection of foreign proteins and other toxic material (particularly known immune-sensitising poisons such as mercury and aluminium compounds, formaldehyde and phenol) sensitises, meaning makes the recipient more, not less, susceptible,
i.e. more easily affected, by what he/she encounters in the future
This means that vaccines do the opposite of immunise, commonly even preventing immunity from developing after natural exposure, in which cases vaccine recipients have gone on to contract the disease not even just once, but several times. (Vaccines "de-immunize".) New, more serious forms of the diseases (e.g. atypical measles) are also now appearing, only in the vaccinated.
Yes, you should worry what's in them.
Isn't this the whole reason to not vaccinate your kids is because you love them.
All you need to know about the great vaccination scam is in the Medical research if you care to read it.
To give an example Polio has never been erradicated by vaccines.
The polio virus is a very small RNA virus, categorized as an enterovirus, meaning that it multiplies primarily in the intestinal tract.
Polio had declined from its peak in 1950 by 80-90% by the time the polio vaccine was introduced in 1956, so the vaccine was not responsible for its decline. Indeed after the vaccine was introduced, the incidence and deaths from polio increased, which was a
major problem.
In 1958 the definition of polio was changed to make the diagnostic criteria so restrictive that it became almost impossible to call an illness polio even when the person suffers paralysis and the polio virus is present.
Immediately this change occurred the number of cases of “polio” crashed, and the number of cases skyrocketed of “other” diseases, such as “viral meningitis” and “cerebral palsy” (up to 75% of these cases are actually polio). All the vaccines - for DPT, MMR, Hib, polio etc are still provoking polio to this day, but the word “polio” is very rarely used. When paralysis occurs it usually does not last more than a couple of days in which cases usually no diagnosis is given when they occur these days.
That'sit in a nutshell. and that is only the tip of the vaccination iceberg.
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks