You don't know what your talking about.
Really, then prove me wrong rather than making insulting statements. Ball's in your court to put your money where your mouth is.

And Polly, I think you might need to re-read them without the simplicity and sarcasm. Culture plays just as big a role in fertility as education. That is also a proven and undeniable fact.

Results from both data sources show that spousal influence, rather than being mutual or reciprocal, is an exclusive right exercised only by the husband...

Pakistan's typical family structure is patriarchal, and women typically live with their husband's family after they are married. Decision-making involves communication between the spouses and elders of the extended family. Elsewhere, researchers have found low levels of communication between spouses about reproductive matters, and women with low levels of contraceptive use report little spousal communication. [4] In addition, mothers-in-law can have power over women's lives [5] and influence the number of children a couple will have. [6] In India, for example, women's mothers-in-law influence reproductive decision-making.
Also, my main point was on population differences, not differences in birth rates which only makes up part of what effects population numbers. While education might lower the birth rate, it would also equip those women to look after the children they have better, therefore reducing the mortality rate. So the population would see little difference in the short to mid term. BTW, I wasn't the one that went off onto a birth rate only focus.