The whole thing about the 'parents right to choose' is not really relevant in this instance, I believe. What about the baby's rights to come into this world as risk-free as possible? Who is the advocate for the one who knows what is best for itself but cannot yet speak for itself? Who is the most fragile in this situation? Who requires protection above anyone else? The baby - of course.
In maternity practice, the chosen outcome should always be based upon what is best for the baby - not what is best for the parents based on their external employment adgendas.
I understand that football is important to this family - but nothing can be so important that it is worth sacrificing the safest possible journey of a child's entrance into the world. The poor little soul's voice has been stolen from him/her - before they even have the chance to speak.
God knows how important football is to this guy - and chances are - their little cherub will NOT choose to come whilst he is playing. But give the poor thing a chance for heaven's sake!!