thread: Vag vs C-section

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User
    Add fionas on Facebook

    Apr 2007
    Recently treechanged to Woodend, VIC
    3,473

    My situation is a bit unusual because I had SPD. I had a VB first time around because everyone told me that SPD did not mean I would need a caesar. Worst thing I ever did. An 18-month recovery and for the first six months I was basically housebound. Also meant I delayed having no. 2.

    Opted for a caesar the second time around, despite many well-meaning people on here again telling me that I needn't have one. THE best thing I ever did. I was better after six days than I was after six months after the VB and immediately contemplated no. 3, the recovery was that good.

    I agree that some people are misinformed and seem to think that a caesar is an easier option but I also think that some people put a VB on a pedestal that is not always useful for people like me who face a unique set of circumstances that make it totally advisable.

  2. #2
    Registered User

    May 2009
    west NSW
    462


    I agree that some people are misinformed and seem to think that a caesar is an easier option but I also think that some people put a VB on a pedestal that is not always useful for people like me who face a unique set of circumstances that make it totally advisable.
    completely understand that as well. i also had a friend who has had 2 c/s with her kids, and had staples (i had stitches) and i couldnt get over how quickly she recovered as well!! i was a wreck after my c/s, but she seemed to bounce back great. also, if i were to have another baby.....i reckon i would choose to have an elective c/s at 37 weeks just because of my situation......so like i said, each to their own......