thread: An interesting benefit of breast feeding...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1

    Jun 2010
    District Twelve
    8,425

    In 1970, around the time I was born, Australia had a breast feeding rate of less than 10 percent at six months (an all time low).

    Interestingly, as breast feeding rates are now 50 per cent better at the same stage, the collective national IQ hasn't peaked and we are facing a childhood obesity crisis.

    Nothing is as black and white as this study suggests.

    Feed your children everyone. And stop worrying how your neighbor is feeding theirs (unless theyre not feeding them at all!)

  2. #2
    ♥ BellyBelly's Creator ♥
    Add BellyBelly on Facebook Follow BellyBelly On Twitter

    Feb 2003
    Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Australia
    8,982

    Birth interventions are also at an all time high
    Kelly xx

    Creator of BellyBelly.com.au, doula, writer and mother of three amazing children
    Author of Want To Be A Doula? Everything You Need To Know
    In 2015 I went Around The World + Kids!
    Forever grateful to my incredible Mod Team

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Nov 2006
    brisbane
    3,975

    But if we can educate and support women who want to feed we need to worry about our neighbours children.
    The info we can get out the better :-)

  4. #4

    Mar 2004
    Sparta
    12,662

    Good point Boomba. Isn't worrying about our neighbour's children at the heart of a village. A village always has a nosy busy-body after all

    I'm glad I was breastfed - I need all the help I can get lol.

    I wonder if any research has been done yet into generational impact of breastfeeding or lack thereof. Maybe the fact that we're getting into 3rd generation formula fed infants might have something to do with soaring childhood obesity rates.

  5. #5
    Moderator

    Oct 2004
    In my Zombie proof fortress.
    6,449

    Good point Boomba. Isn't worrying about our neighbour's children at the heart of a village. A village always has a nosy busy-body after all

    I'm glad I was breastfed - I need all the help I can get lol.

    I wonder if any research has been done yet into generational impact of breastfeeding or lack thereof. Maybe the fact that we're getting into 3rd generation formula fed infants might have something to do with soaring childhood obesity rates.
    There has been studies on cats. Basically from what I can recall problems did not appear in the first generation, but in the ones that came after and they were so bad, that the study basically had to stop/was stopped due to the cats being unable to breed/survive (**disclaimer I am doing this from memory, so I could be wrong, will google now to see if I can find a reference to the study). I recall hearing about this, but it was in an article/discussion about why we "suddenly" seem to have an issue with gluten.

    ETA: Pottenger's s cats - Study on how inherited degenerative disease is caused by improper nutrition that weakens the genetic code you pass to your children. *Warning - don't look up if you are a bit sensitive*
    Last edited by Astrid; June 28th, 2012 at 10:17 PM.

  6. #6
    BellyBelly Life Subscriber

    Jan 2006
    11,633

    Yes, I think that's a very likely scenario, unfortunately.
    The truth is that formula - in its changing forms over the decades - has been tested on children in the marketplace and the effects have become so normalised now because of it's prevalence.

  7. #7
    Moderator

    Oct 2004
    In my Zombie proof fortress.
    6,449

    I also think what happens, is that no-one asks "where you formula fed as a baby?' when you see a medical professional. They ask all the other history and family history, but never that. I my heart, I believe DH's extreme case of diverticulitis is connected to what he was fed as a baby (in conjunction to existing genetics), his mother was also formula fed (both not straight away, but after 6 or so weeks). I think we would have a greater picture of what risks are if they added that one question to all medical questionnaires.

  8. #8
    BellyBelly Life Subscriber

    Jan 2006
    11,633

    There are no absolutes, N2L, and there are many variables. But I don't think we should discount the importance of early nutrition because of that.
    THough I don't know what data you are referring to, just generally I would add - breastfeeding in studies is often not defined (one breastfeed in 24 hours or 100% breastmilk?), and there is evidence of a duration effect when it comes to breastfeeding - i.e., the longer the better (or, conversely, the shorter the worse, I suppose).

    Marushka - absolutely.

    I know some people read these things and interpret it as people trying to make other people do this or that. It's not about making mothers breastfeed. Hell, most mothers - the overwhelming majority even - want to breastfeed. It's about acknowledging that it's important - not just for individual mothers and babies, but for our community as a whole - and, crucially, recognising the vital role that other people play in ensuring mothers are actually able to breastfeed like they want to.