So it is actually 10 months in the preceding 392 days?

Do you know how many days they use in a month?

E.g.

Is 10 months equal to 300 days?

I have always been vaguely curious as to why I didnt qualify as I thought 10 months but seems was slightly out on days.

I really think these eligibility criteria need to be rexamined - especially in light of the reduction in baby bonus for subsequent children as PPL is meant to be an alternative.

My previous employer for example you had to get a doctors note to confirm you were ok to work past 36 weeks - so it then seems odd to have EDD as the time point for PPL because as I said before people should be able to choose when they finish work based on their health and if they want to rather than needing to squeeze in more days due to PPL. Changing the qualifiying criteria to estimated 36 weeks would help people get in a qualifying period of work between children 1 & 2 for example.