thread: Consent to Medical Treatment

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Oct 2007
    Middle Victoria
    8,924

    But in an emergency, they wouldn't need my consent to call an ambulance.

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Jun 2009
    vic
    2,886

    ".......
    Last edited by Eenee; October 31st, 2013 at 07:55 PM.

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Jan 2008
    Central Coast NSW
    2,160

    But in an emergency, they wouldn't need my consent to call an ambulance.
    To me, this is what the form is asking? Permission to call an ambulance, in a emergency, perhaps BEFORE they contact you - ie the first call they make. I think they do need permission to call an ambulance and transport your child under any circumstances. I guess what constitutes an emergency is also subject to interpretation and this covers them from parents who then refuse to pay the ambulance bill by saying it was unnecessary and the childcare should pay?

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Aug 2006
    On the other side of this screen!!!
    11,129

    I'm not sure why you think they wouldn't need consent for your child to leave the premises with someone other than yourself or a guardian (ie in an ambulance)? Why wouldn't they need consent if it was an emergency?
    Last edited by AnyDream; October 31st, 2013 at 07:34 PM.

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Oct 2007
    Middle Victoria
    8,924

    I'm not sure why you think they wouldn't need consent for your child to leave the premises with someone other than yourself or a guardian (ie in an ambulance)? Why wouldn't they need consent if it was an emergency? uzzled:
    i thought they would be covered under something like 'good samaritan act'. if an adult is physically unable to consent (ie unconscious), then an ambulance can transport them (and perform some medical procedures) without gaining consent.

  6. #6
    Moderator

    Oct 2004
    In my Zombie proof fortress.
    6,449

    Have you asked them for clarification? Often these forms are part of legalities and accreditation. They need to ask, but it is pretty rare for them to act on it.

    In an emergency I would much rather they call the ambulance, than try to call me or DH first and as care providers I trust them to make that call.

  7. #7
    Registered User

    Oct 2007
    Middle Victoria
    8,924

    Perhaps if it said "in an emergency" at the end of the statement i wouldn't be questioning it. There is a number to ring to get clarification.

    Thanks

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Dec 2007
    Victoria
    7,260

    Again, the form you are signing is asking consent to SEEK treatment and to allow the child to be TRANSPORTED to said medical treatment.

    It is NOT asking your consent for any medical procedures or treatment that the doctor would perform.

    There is a difference.

  9. #9
    Registered User

    Jan 2009
    5,235

    When you start adding in wording such as "in an emergency" that then requires someone to determine what an emergency is. Unfortunately a lot of this stuff is all about what is legal 'jargon'.
    The other thing is, it won't always be an emergency when medical treatment is needed - any injury that you bandage, etc is needing medical treatment.

    ETA to say I agree with LS's last comment.

  10. #10
    Registered User

    Aug 2006
    On the other side of this screen!!!
    11,129

    I think the consent is less about what the ambulance/doctor/hospital can do, and more about whether the childcare centre is allowed to initiate the seeking of the ambulance/doctor/hospital on behalf of the child's parent/guardian in your absence.

    I for one have had the occasional situation where the carer/school were not able to contact me immediately, (but thankfully never any dire emergency). I would not want the centre to be waiting until they have spoken to me to decide to call an ambulance if an ambulance was needed straight away. I sign the consent.