it will be interesting to see what the medical community think in regards to uncircumcised males being more prone to disease than circumcised males. I was always told that anyone can get any STD if they are having sex unprotected, now we are being told otherwise.I cant imagine that uncircumcised or circumcised would determine whether a man would be more likely to get HIV? just seems like scare tactics to me. TV journos really need some concrete proof before reporting such things IMO