One of the most balanced articles on circumcision is the Wikipedia article on the topic - they have a NPOV (neutral point of view) policy which requires that they must not be biased towards one side or the other. It can be found here:

Circumcision - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

My personal opinion is that circumcision for non-medical reasons is a cosmetic procedure, and I believe it is not ethically appropriate for parents to make decisions about cosmetic alterations on behalf of their children.

My professional opinion is that the risks and costs associated with routine neonatal circumcision do not outweigh the risks and costs associated with the small reduction in the risk of UTI and the very rare male penile cancer that circumcision affords.