thread: 28 day cycle but ovulating day 19 - normal?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Nov 2008
    Perth
    3,686

    28 day cycle but ovulating day 19 - normal?

    I'm new to BB so sorry if this has been raised before!

    I've been TTC for 3 months and have been off the pill for 3 months too. I hadn't noticed EWCM until today (very excited that my girls are finally showing me some real signs!) but it's day 19 and my cycles are actually regular - 28 days with 2 days of spotting before AF's 'full' arrival (I don't count the spotting in my 28 days). Is this 'normal'?

    I thought I'd ovulated over the weekend as I had a few cramps and was wetter (sorry for TMI!) but today was definitely EW. We took advantage of the situation so hopefully we'll get a BFP soon.

    Any advice would be great!

  2. #2
    ♥ BellyBelly's Creator ♥
    Add BellyBelly on Facebook Follow BellyBelly On Twitter

    Feb 2003
    Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Australia
    8,982

    What's normal? And who is?
    Kelly xx

    Creator of BellyBelly.com.au, doula, writer and mother of three amazing children
    Author of Want To Be A Doula? Everything You Need To Know
    In 2015 I went Around The World + Kids!
    Forever grateful to my incredible Mod Team

  3. #3
    midnightsun Guest

    I don't really think there is any such thing as "normal". That's why I tend to recommend getting an ovulation kit if you have tried for a while, as so many women are outside the so called "normal range" (hate those words).
    I hope that you are right about ovulating today and will have your BFP in a few weeks

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Dec 2006
    In my own private paradise
    15,272

    if you luteal phase (O to AF) is less than 10 days, it is deemed too short to be successful in holding a pregnancy. i would suggest tracking ovulation signs using a program like fertility friend, or with OPK's for a couple of months, and if O is late each cycle and your luteal phase is short go and speak to your Gp about your concerns

    in a "normal" healthy couple, it's not unusual to take up to 12 months to conceive, so you may find you get resistance from your GP if you go in sooner - hence me suggesting you track your cycles and go in armed with "evidence" that your luteal phase is not long enough to help you in conceiving

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Nov 2008
    Perth
    3,686

    Hmm, good point, 'normal' isn't really relevant when it comes to our reproductive systems!

    I've read up on short luetal phases and yeah, that's a bit frightening! I'm not overly worried yet but I just don't fancy stuffing around for months only to be told I need some tests, etc so I'll definitely bring it up with GP on Monday. I've been keeping notes on a few things (have taken a couple of temps too but I'm not consistent) so I should have enough amo to warrant some further investigation. My history of endo should help (hmm, doens't sound quite right!) as there was always the concern that I may have difficulties conceiving.

    Midnightsun - thanks, I hope so too! Which OPK do you recommend?

    Thanks for the advice and info!
    Last edited by Taurean; November 28th, 2008 at 02:00 PM.

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Nov 2008
    Perth, WA
    2,315

    I know this thread has been 'dead' awhile but just saw it and was wondering what your dr said, Taurean. I have had pretty irregular cycles in the past, but lately have been 28-30 days with O at day 20. My dr did bloods to confirm O, but didn't seem at all concerned about the short luteal phase (I didn't know about the 10 day thing until I read it here). So, I was wondering what your dr said as it would be useful for me too.
    I also have a history of endo, but this didn't seem to push dr into doing anything early- he said the 12month mark is when I should look for a referral to a fs, but is happy to test dh so we are armed with any info we need to get the ball rolling quickly after 12 months.