Yep, I think that VE's can definitely be overdone, or "over relied on" if you know what I mean. There is always the risk of infection, along with the possibility of becoming discouraged if the result isn't what you were hoping for, etc. Personally though, I like to have a check once in a while in labour. I've never found them too uncomfortable (maybe I've got especially gentle midwives...?) and I like to have a concrete marker to tell me that I'm really accomplishing something - ie. you were at 4 and now you're at 7, so things are truly happening. My water has generally been broken shortly before pushing, so I wouldn't have too many checks with broken water anyways. And I liked to have the go ahead on pushing too - not that you can do much to stop it. But I've read a number of stories where a woman pushed for an hour, and then they checked and discovered a lip of cervix that had to be moved. I'd rather know beforehand that everything is clear, and I'm all set to push for all I'm worth.
Those are just my personal preferences though - I don't think that VE's should be considered essential for assessing labour. My midwives have done them only at my request, not just for the sake of filling out the paperwork.![]()







She is fine with that, she cost almost as much as an IM anyway, but was so worth it. This time we'll most likely be having her again in top of an IM. Like HotI said, a Medicare funded midwife will have a lot more restrictions than one without it, for me, we went through a hospital (aka Medicare) HB program, which was good, but not something I want to do again. Too many policies that didn't gel with me.

Bookmarks