Thanks gorgeous I doubt it hun, they can only go down with age. I am so upset as I was on DF's back for months about how my eggs are literally 'frying', and he always said 'you'll be right, look what happened the first time round' . Yeah right. Always trust your gut instinct I say. I can already tell the FS will say just do a cycle now. I will be sh*t scared though as he did say that generally a low AMH result means low egg quality. Great. I asked the nurse if they have possibly made an error?????? She said it's unlikely, but I think for my piece of mind I will repeat the test.
Tash, no frosties here unfortunately We'll have to do a fully stimulated cycle. I really want to repeat the test, in case the've buggered up. The other thing that has ccured to me is, maybe they have buggered up the test in the first place 10 months ago and the result was a lot less than 13 so in that case this test is more in line with the first one if that makes sense??
Bugger Hun....now you have me worried too...we also had AMH testing last October and got a 13.4......now I am wondering if we should also get retested.....yikes!!
It is so stressful all this bulldust hey, as if we haven't gone through enough to get to the point we are at now with our little miracle men....now we have to worry about whether we are too friggin old to give them a sibling.....gets me so angry!!
Hey Mel, don't get me started! lol. I really don't want DS to grow up without a brother or sister here. I just feel so down about it all, it's like someone has just shot me down. All this, 'ahh but your results were so good 10 months ago so you should be right' has just gone out the window, unless they have made an error. Oh God, please let it be an error! If you're thinking of another baby hun I'd go and re check the levels. You might be OK but you just never know hun.
Is it something that can fluctuate?
BellyBelly Life Subscriber
We'll have to do a fully stimulated cycle. I really want to repeat the test, in case the've buggered up. The other thing that has ccured to me is, maybe they have buggered up the test in the first place 10 months ago and the result was a lot less than 13 so in that case this test is more in line with the first one if that makes sense??
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks