I would love to sahbear but I just want to address wysiwyg first. Now I'm going to assume you mean radical unschooling which goes beyond education and into family life and parenting. If not hopefully this is still relevant.

Now Teeki has the general idea there although we try to steer clear of the child-led analogies. It leads people to believe the parent role is quite inactive or the relationship is quite permissive (both inaccuracies). The problem with a child being in school due to a parent working is that it is compulsory for the child without them even having a say in the matter. It places the parents wants and needs (to work) higher than that of the childs, it undermines the partnership and relationship (key parts in unschooling). Now there are unschooled households were both parents work, nobody should be going hungry obviously but this is done in a way that still has the childs needs and wants heard and answered as well as the parents.

So of course unschooling (or radical unschooling) principles can be applied to a life that includes school (some is better than none I say) but it still isn't unschooling, I'm not sure why you would want to or need to call it that anyway? There are parenting terms that include similar ideals you could use to help identify what you mean instead, unschooling is confusing enough for people to understand lol. Unschooling is the sum of all of its parts, a large one being the active rejection of school.

There is a grey area where an unschooled child chooses to try school and the parents facilitate this. Because they have the freedom to leave at any point and are the one pursuing it it still could be considered unschooling.