123

thread: u/s if you had your time again..would you?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    2013 BellyBelly RAK Recipient.

    May 2007
    Brisbane
    5,310

    Yep, I had 7 week, 12 week and 19 week. Once I started feeling movement I didn't feel like I 'needed' the scans. As another posted said, it was part of the bonding process.

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Aug 2006
    3,562

    Yes, I would.

    With my boys I went private and had an Ob. He did a 30 sec scan at each appt and after loosing a baby at 12 weeks, I needed that 'sanity scan' to keep my anxiety in check. Particularly with DS1 who was the pregnancy after our loss and also an IVF bub.

  3. #3

    Dec 2005
    not with crazy people
    8,023

    Not everyone bonds with a baby in utero though. They need to see their little person IRL

    im feeling like the odd one out

  4. #4
    2013 BellyBelly RAK Recipient.

    May 2007
    Brisbane
    5,310

    Yeah, but then there are others who do. Different strokes for different folks, as they say

  5. #5

    Jul 2009
    Australia
    5,102

    With my first i think it was important for me to have that scan but i dont think i would bother with other pregnancies.

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Feb 2004
    Melbourne
    11,171

    I'm a bit of a fence sitter on this one....

    With DS I had a scan at 18 weeks & another at 32 weeks. I would have been happy with just the 18 week scan, but the 32 week one was due to an suspected amniotic fluid issue.

    With DD I had scans at 7 weeks, 19 weeks, 28 weeks & 37 weeks. The first was because she was an IVF baby & it is part of my clinic's protocol to make sure bub is in the right place. The 28 & 37 week scans were because the midwives thought she was small & the doctors thought she was big (conflict there? LOL) but she was sot on for dates at both. I don't think either of those were necessary at all & given the choice I wouldn't have them again.

    With my third pregnancy I had just the one scan at 9 weeks 5 days. I was measuring at 12 weeks and my dates were uncertain, so my doctor sent me for a scan to check for twins or if I was further ahead (which was a possibility because of my previous cycle). At the appointment I was going to ask him to send me for a scan if he didn't order one, because I had a dreadful feeling that something was wrong. Sadly I was right Put in the same situation I would absolutely have another scan to set my mind at ease or to find out bad news sooner rather than later.

    For future pregnancies my doctor has recommended an early scan to make sure all is ok because of the miscarriage I had in January. I'm happy with that because I have bad anxiety until I feel movement which I supsect will be worse now given that we have lost a pregnancy.

  7. #7
    2012 BellyBelly RAK Recipient.
    Add AngelPants on Facebook

    Feb 2010
    Under the rock
    1,320

    i have had a scan at 9weeks, 12weeks, 19weeks, 31 weeks and am having another 1 on thursday (34weeks) the extras to check cos it hasnt been progress as they would like.
    i have to say i like how often i hav gotten to see my lil boy it has helped me bond with bubs a LOT.

    SO next time, i think i will b glad with only the normal 2 scans but i will definately have the scans. i dont think i could go the whole 9 months without peeking at my baby.

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Sep 2006
    1,223

    Absolutely YES from me too. With DS we had scans at 7w, 10w,12w, 19w, 34w and 36w(plus a few very quick scans in my Ob's rooms during my regular appointments up to around 24w.The 34 and 36w scans were to check fluid levels and his growth and it was detrmined at the 36w scan that he needed to be born asap via emergency c/s due to IUGR and no fluid at all. My placenta had failed so things needed to happen very fast. I'm so greatful to my Ob for insisting I had all the scans.
    I would have just as many scans again if required.

  9. #9
    2013 BellyBelly RAK Recipient.

    Apr 2009
    3,750

    With DD1 I had a scan at 17weeks5days and that was it.

    With DD2 I had a scan at 8wks, 13wks, 17wks, 20wks and 32wks. We were told medication I was on for arthritis would have cause teretogenic effects hence the numerous scans. I was adviced to terminte but refused.

    With my next pregnancy I'll be having a few extra scans due to my history of EP's. I'll be wanting to confirm its in the right place and then viable seeing as I have had way more pregnancies then babies. Again I would not terminate the pregnancy if something was discovered but I would want to be prepared (for a disabled child or a baby I wouldn't be bringing home) I'll be saying yes to all the scans on offer. Its not about a bonding thing for me either bonding for me if from the movements, preparring etc. I didn't get any bonding assistance from my scans but thats probably as I wasn't able to see them until it was finished when I was shown the heart beat etc. It was very medical not personal at all.

  10. #10
    Registered User

    Apr 2008
    Melbourne
    6,745

    With DD2 I had bleeding early on so I was very happy to have the scans to keep seeing that she was actually ok. I only had 2 scans with DD1 and had 4 with DD2 but yes I would have them all over again if I was guaranteed the same result as I have now

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Add TeniBear on Facebook Follow TeniBear On Twitter

    Oct 2009
    Lalor, VIC
    5,051

    I'd have insisted on getting the video of my 20wk one. What a disgrace that was... He was wiggling around a lot Must dig up all the x-ray type "prints" we got from that and the 12wk one, have another long look at them

    I'd rather not have had the final one, but it wouldn't change the result...

  12. #12

    May 2008
    Melbourne, Vic
    8,631

    Maz, I had no idea about your history and your kidlets - what an amazing woman and mum you are

    When we received the all clear after DD's 20wk scan, we left the hospital and the inevitable discussion began - next time, would we do it again?

    For us, the answer was never really anything but "yes". I think the benefits far outweigh the potential stress - and speaking as somoene who has been thru much, much, much unnecessary stress, I think I am justified in making that call!

    There are two ministers at my church who recently chose not to have their 12wk scan, just the morphology scan, because they would never terminate. And that is their choice, just like it is the choice of every couple who concieve a baby.

  13. #13
    BellyBelly Member

    Mar 2009
    1,385

    I had quite a few u/s with DS as they were concerned about his size. It caused unnecessary stress (they thought he was small, he was born at 8lb 15oz) and so with this PG i think i will only be having the 20 week scan. I am sure of my dates but will need to talk further with DH about the NT scan, as he may feel differently, but i'd be happy no to have that one either.

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Add helle on Facebook

    Sep 2008
    Bunbury, Western Australia
    3,963

    Yep.
    Jayvan had died 2 weeks prior to us actually finding out, so ultrasounds thru jacksons pregnancy kept me sane, to know he was still alive and kicking! After he starting moving around tho and I could tell on my own he was OK I started to get a bit sick of them - a years worth of being poked and prodded is enough for me!

  15. #15
    Registered User

    Jun 2007
    Melbourne, ready to meet peeps IRL
    2,221

    Maz I am with you, I dont think I would... I am in the healthy age breaket, there is no family history, and at the end of the day after all the tests they can only give you a 1 in 49 chance of something been wrong, so for me all it would do is couse a HUGE agreument beltween BHL and I if the tests came back with a chance there was something wrong with our child... As a doctor once put it too me, you wouldnt bet your house on a horse that is has a 1 in 49 chance of winning would you...

    Every child of ours is much wanted and love already, I would just wait for the 19week scan, even though it is lovely to see them as much as you can, it still doesnt stop the worry ( well doesnt for me ) the only thing that stops my worry is when they are saftly in my arms, the I move on the the next set of worries lol...

  16. #16

    May 2008
    Melbourne, Vic
    8,631

    Mildez, interesting post, thanks for that different perspective.

  17. #17

    Aug 2009
    Yarra Valley, Victoria
    1,215

    I think I may just get the 20 week scan next time, one is enough, and only because I'd want to *see* the baby, and so they can see if he or she is developing okay. Termination would never be considered for us, no matter what was worng with the lo I guess its just nice to have something to look forward to midway of the pregnancy.

  18. #18

    Dec 2005
    not with crazy people
    8,023

    Those of you who have said termination would never be a consideration...have you been in a circumstance were it was an option for health reasons?

    No amount of research (in my opinion) can prepare you for what lays ahead with a child with special needs, its something that you learn whilst living it as every child is entirely different.

    Mildez - I dont think that is the case at every hospital eg u/s before birth as Ive personally know of girls who havent had one and gone in to have a hospital birth with no u/s.

    What about those who home birth and dont have u/s the entire pg?

    I wonder if we depend to much on the technology available today for our pg's then to be able to tune into our own bodies and learn to listen to them? How ever did our mothers and for mothers cope?

    I knew I was m/c the pg before I concieved Tank. I told the doctor I was and it wasnt 'confirmed' until they insisted I do an u/s, when we found out that we had actually m/c twins. I handled knowing I was m/c at that stage until then. Its something I sometimes wish I hadnt have know. KWIM.

123