thread: Further along!?!?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Feb 2007
    Brisbane
    109

    Exclamation

    Yeah i thought it was becoz of the fluid too but i had a scan at 31wks & bub measured around 33.5wks(I forgot to add that to my post). Its all very confusing...

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Dec 2005
    In Bankworld with Barbara
    14,222

    Growth scans are notoriously inaccurate to measure size of bubs. You can get different results based on who does the scan (no two scans by two different people will be the same), whether baby has a full tummy or not and it could just be that your baby has long legs (considering that measurements used to estimate weight in-utero are based on the femur length).