Twilight being banned in schools!!

[Floweryfields]

Oh my the flowers in the attic series and her other books had soo much sex! Incestual too wasn't some of it? I read alot of those books in highschool - Mum didn't know what i was reading! In the end VA books are basically all the same. I've not read the twighlight books so can't comment there.
The virginia andrews books definitely shouldn't have been for primary school reading though!

[Phteven]

I gave the series to my niece after I finished them because she is an Edward fan. I'm not sure if she read them or not. I'm not sure if they're appropriate for primary age or not. I would have thought they're better suited to teenagers.
I'm a big advocate of encouraging reading by allowing children to choose their own books.
That said, if a parent thinks that a book inappropriate or not in keeping with the values that they're trying to instill in their children then they have my full support. If I didn't want my children to read something I would like to be supported in that - after all they will be able to read it as adults if they want.

[Nelle]

I always figured Twilight was an early teen thing and less a pre-teen thing? Could be totally wrong though, not having read it myself.

I guess I interpret these decisions as a control thing. If there is a school where some/many parents want to discourage their children from certain books until they hit high school, then perhaps asking children not to bring those books to school is sensible. I mean, we're always talking about parents taking responsibility for the media/content their children interact with, so if a parent decides their child shouldn't read something til year 7 then I guess that needs to be respected.

[Floweryfields]

Yes I agree - it should be the parent's choice, what they believe is acceptable for their child to read. I think there is a big difference to the books being available in the library (though the age probably should be limited for certain books) than say, if the teacher were using it as a class novel that everyone had to read.

[Chocaholic]

Quite frankly, I don't mind if the library at school is banning them. I think it is a parental thing to determine what books are appropriate and if the child wants to read a certain book and it is not available at the school, then ask their parents and surely mum or dad could take them to the local library or purchase the book if the child is that interested.

TBH I very rarely read books from my school library as they didn't appeal to me. My mum would take me to the local library at least once a fortnight to exchange the books I had checked out. It was a great mother/daughter experience as it always turned into a coffee/hot chocolate chat session.

[krysalyss]

I think banning books is quite controversial in any regards. But I have to say I don't really think it is suitable for primary school children mostly due to the amount of sexual references, but also due to the violence in the book although I wouldn't pinpoint it just to violence against women but there is certainly detailed violence in there. Although I wouldnt support banning I also wouldn't go and recommend it to a pre-teen. Just my opinion.

[Roryrory]

virginia andrews "flowers in the attic" which was available from my private, catholic, all girls school library!

LOL Flowers in the Attic was hot property at my all-girls Anglican private school - you had to be on the waiting list (I bet no one at the school ever read it). Tweens will always want slightly racy stuff. As for the violence part, I've not read the books but it sounds pretty mild. IMO a girl will grow up to think violence against women is ok she sees her dad beat up her mum, not if she reads about a rough kiss in a fantasy novel. I bet every girl who read flowers in the attic didn't race out thinking it was ok to sleep with her brother.

Although I wouldnt support banning I also wouldn't go and recommend it to a pre-teen. Just my opinion.

This is the crux of it though - aren't they talking about not having it at a primary school library? I would say I'd support that, because 12 year olds might be up for it but I don't personally think 10 year olds should be reading about fictionalised sex (unless we are talking about a 10 year old who has been abused and her therapist has recommended that she read a particular fictional book which might help her deal with what had happened to her). Personally I am pretty repulsed by the overt sexualisation of young girls - sure 10 year olds are sexual creatures - all humans are - but I see pre-teens reading Twighligh just part of the same continum which sees 6 year olds wearing mini-bras and high heels. My stepbrother's wife is looking for a g-string for her 8 year old - that is just wrong IMO....

[AnyDream]

My feeling is that they're not so appropriate in the primary school context - better suited to a high school age group. This doesn't mean they should be actively "banned" though. In the school context this comes down to the teacher librarian selecting the titles that are most suitable in content and interest for a range of readers of varying ages at that school. A good rule of thumb is the age of the central characters...isn't Bella 16 at the start of the series? That places these books well out of the context of the average 10-12 year old's experience. Also reflected in the movie adaptation's rating, which was M and not a PG.

My DD (11) has expressed an interest in reading these but I have told her she can wait a couple of years and enjoy them then. None of her peers have read it either (but I think a few have older siblings who have read them or seen the movie so it's seen as very cool).

ETA - ugh Rory the gstring thing is soooo wrong!! Why why why???