Slow Cookers - 3.5 L or 6 L?

[Michelle71]

Get the 6L - you can do roasts as well in the bigger one and it isn't too big for just 2 (and a little one )

[maz]

I have mine on now
we had the small one and it did my head in...and i actually have the kambrook 6l one

LOVE IT!!!!!! you dont have to fill it every time dont forget.

[FabFiona]

Fabulous! My gut was saying 6 litres, but just wanted to check with all my fellow Domestic Goddesses.

[Trillian]

Get the bigger one as a smaller one is useless for doing a chook, lamb shanks or a leg of lamb/roast beef/silverside. Slow cooking is so much more than just casseroles, soups and stews these days and you will get more benefit in the long run from a larger one. There is also the benefit of having leftovers you can freeze if you just don't feel like cooking one night or need something quick and easy to get out of the freezer. That said I would also like a 3.5lt one myself so I can do desserts.

[~Kim~]

:yeahthat:
exactly what I was going to say