12

thread: Weight of third or subsequent baby...

  1. #1

    May 2008
    Melbourne, Vic
    8,631

    Weight of third or subsequent baby...

    I'm after some info on the size of your babies at birth, specifically those that have had three or more. I've had two, DD was 3.83kg, followed by DS at 4.84kg. I'm wondering what the likelihood is of this next LO being bigger than DS?

    I know that generally second babies tend to be bigger than first... what about third baby?

    Am I in for a whopper here??

    So hit me with your anecdotes! What were your three or more weights?

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Add TeniBear on Facebook Follow TeniBear On Twitter

    Oct 2009
    Lalor, VIC
    5,051

    I think I was my mum's biggest (first of three), though I reckon my first brother would have been if he hadn't been premature. Brother 2 would be the smallest. Don't ask for exact details though, I've no clue


    Sent from my iPhone so forgive the speelung misstacks

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Aug 2007
    Sydney
    1,691

    Wow, your DS was a whopper! My babies got smaller.

    DS1 - 3.94kg
    DD - 3.71kg
    DS2 - 3.67kg

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Jan 2009
    pakenham, victoria
    3,660

    DD1, 3.65kg (41 and 4)
    DD2, 3.55kg (4 weeks early)
    DS, 3.72kgs (38 weeks)

  5. #5
    2014 BellyBelly RAK Recipient.

    Mar 2010
    1,200

    My babies got smaller!
    DD1 4.04kg
    DD2 3.2kg
    DD3 2.8kgs

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Sep 2011
    Brisbane
    97

    I've asked doctors this and the consensus is that the second is bigger than the first, but after that it's random. Mine were:

    First - 7'12
    Second - 8'15
    Third - 9'7
    Fourth - 8 pound

  7. #7
    Registered User

    Oct 2007
    Middle Victoria
    8,924

    Yay for babies getting smaller!

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Feb 2006
    NSW Central Coast
    5,301

    #1- 3.4kg @ 37w 4days
    #2- 4.2kg @ 40w 3days
    #3- 3.8kg @ 38w 4days

  9. #9
    2014 BellyBelly RAK Recipient.

    Mar 2010
    1,200

    all three had the same size head, and that is the part that makes a difference, not the actual weight!

  10. #10
    Registered User

    Dec 2007
    Geelong
    3,438

    DS 7.4 lb
    DS 7.5 lb
    DD 5.9 lb
    DD 6.7 lb

    Regards,
    Dianne

  11. #11
    Registered User

    Apr 2008
    Melbourne
    6,745

    My Step-SIL has 4 boys and they have been progressively smaller!

  12. #12
    Registered User

    Jan 2006
    country victoria
    1,055

    Mine were

    DS1 - 7.14lb 39w 5 days
    DS2 - 8.14lb 40w 1 day
    DS3 - 7.10lb 39w

  13. #13
    2013 BellyBelly RAK Recipient.

    Apr 2006
    Winter is coming
    5,000

    DS 3.63kg @ 39 + 3
    DD1 3.75kg @ 39 + 6
    DD2 4.53kg @ 40 + 4

    Mine got bigger

  14. #14
    Registered User

    Dec 2005
    In Bankworld with Barbara
    14,222

    It's really something that is totally random. There is no way of knowing if a subsequent baby will be bigger than the others. I wouldn't worry about it - what will be will be and if you've gotten a baby out that big before, then you can do it again.

  15. #15

    May 2008
    Melbourne, Vic
    8,631

    Wow, your DS was a whopper! My babies got smaller.
    Hehe yep hence my question...

    It's really something that is totally random. There is no way of knowing if a subsequent baby will be bigger than the others. I wouldn't worry about it - what will be will be and if you've gotten a baby out that big before, then you can do it again.
    I know its random... I know there's no way of predicting... that's why I asked for anecdotes!

    I have complete confidence in my body to do its thing, TBH my labour with DS and his actual birth was much better than my labour with DD and her birth!

    I was just curious

    Anecdotally - looks like third babies get smaller

  16. #16

    May 2008
    Melbourne, Vic
    8,631

    DS 3.63kg @ 39 + 3
    DD1 3.75kg @ 39 + 6
    DD2 4.53kg @ 40 + 4

    Mine got bigger
    Except for Arte. She's bucking the trend!

    I choose to ignore this post on the grounds that it may terrify me!!!!

  17. #17
    Registered User

    Dec 2005
    In Bankworld with Barbara
    14,222

    If you just want anecdotes then my third was bigger. But my second was smaller. My midwife at the time said 2nd bubs are generally bigger if they are a boy, but can be smaller if they are a girl - which she was. Then my 3rd was bigger and my 4th was bigger again. They were 4.18, 3.85, 4.32 and 4.56

  18. #18
    Registered User

    Jan 2010
    1,975

    DD1 2.7kg
    DS 3.57kg
    DD2 3.3kg

    All born a few days shy of 40 weeks. First birth (my smallest baby) was very difficult, obstructed labour, failed ventouse, forceps delivery and an episiotomy. Second delivery was easier with a small tear, third bub pretty much fell out with a couple of pushes, minor tear.

12