thread: Does the person 'acting' usually get the job?

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    2013 BellyBelly RAK Recipient.

    Apr 2006
    Winter is coming
    5,000

    I was in a casual role for a couple of months and interviewed for the permanent position but didn't get it.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Add krysalyss on Facebook

    Feb 2007
    on the move.....
    2,745

    Hmmmm interesting. Thanks guys! I did also feel a bit of negativity from one of the panel as my past experience was very applicable but perhaps not gained in the most traditional roles. Oh well, what will be, will be I guess Thanks again!

  3. #3
    2013 BellyBelly RAK Recipient.

    Apr 2006
    Winter is coming
    5,000

    Good luck

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Jul 2010
    Canberra
    1,788

    No.

    I've been in a job acting for 12+ months and didn't get it; I've also hired people ahead of the person acting.

    I agree with PPs and also wanted to add that it really depends how competitive the field is.

    Good luck, hope you get some news soon!

  5. #5
    BellyBelly Life Subscriber
    Add sushee on Facebook

    Sep 2004
    Melb - where my coolness isn't seen as wierdness
    4,361

    There's always a lean towards in the incumbent simply because they SHOULD be able to tailor their examples to the position, but often many don't utilise this advantage. But when applying for jobs, don't hesitate to apply for something you want simply because someone has acted in it before. The number of people I've seen who get a job simply because no one else has bothered to apply would surprise you. AND just because you don't get a job doesn't mean the panel won't note your interest in the position or your skills should something else come up.

    I tell my team all the time, apply if you want it. If you do nothing, you get nothing.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Add krysalyss on Facebook

    Feb 2007
    on the move.....
    2,745

    OK thanks everyone. They actually contacted one of my references today. Not sure how much that means. I stuffed that up a little though as I was so sure I didn't get it that I didn't bother to text her for a couple of hours and then only did it as a just in case. She had agreed to be a reference for jobs but I didn't yet tell her I had the interview for that particular job. So they had actually contacted her before I texted her.
    But on another note I got an interesting email this morning. I don't post threads too often but will post another about this one. LOL

  7. #7
    BellyBelly Member

    May 2007
    ACT
    523

    If it's a government job, and a good panel they will judge solely on the application and interview. It's not always the acting incumbent who gets the job if the fail to demonstrate in these two opportunities they have the skills to do the job.

    Government jobs can also form an order of merit - a list of people who were also found suitable for the job and can be contacted within a set timeframe if the person who they select now moves leaves the job, gets promoted etc. That way they don't need to go through the whole exercise again, but they do not have to use the merit list either.