Atheism/Agnosticism General Discussion #1

[echidna]

Well I don't really read into things. I honestly didn't know the definitions of the terms, and I wasn't really interested anyway. But, I guess I am more agnostic than athiest. More of a weak than a strong agnostic. I don't not believe in a higher power, but I feel there could be one, but I don't feel they need my worship. When I have actively prayed, my life was no better than when I am not praying. I don't believe in miracles. I am a scientific person, and everything can be explained. If things cannot be explained, given time and more knowledge of the universe, it will become explained. Look at history, magic and blasphemy were science, and those that did not understand were afraid and persecution ensued etc. After the dark ages, science was popular again, especially in the health field. Everyone wanted to see a doctor to cure ails, rather than the priest for a blessing.

One of the most famous miracles, Jesus walking on water. I just keep saying to myself, he was walking on a sandbar. That's if Jesus ever existed. If there is no proof, then it is likely to not be true. I believe in the theory of evolution. So much evidence. To believe that Adam and Eve were the first people, to me, is preposterous. They had two sons, one of which killed the other. How the heck does the human race develop from that family? And furthermore, there would have been very little genetic difference, leading to birth defects. Its beyond me.

I respect that many many people believe in a faith. To believe that someone or something is moving the pieces of life in place and so forth is important to many people, who feel that something must explain what they cannot explain. I believe there is a good chance there is a higher power, but I have less than heresay in a form of evidence. Sometimes a coincidence or event is just too odd to have happened naturally. But I try not to think that it is a higher power who performed it, as I have no evidence.

I get the occasional whisper, I guess similar to being psychic. I don't believe I am psychic, but sometimes I get a whisper, a yes or no question, without warning or reason to dispute. I only have a moment to make the decision before an event. I do not know what the event is. When I was younger, a tree fell against the house. A branch went through the open window, and moments before, I had a whisper: go over and get that block. So I did. Had I not moved, the tree branch would have gone through my face. Every now and then I get whispers. Another time was when I was in high school. I was fooling around with my boyfriend in my bedroom with the door closed. My top was undone. I had a whisper, do up your shirt and stop fooling around. I did that. Sat on my bed reading, and Mum opened the door with force, glaring at me. But I wasn't doing anything wrong. Had I not done what the whisper said, I would have been sorely punished.

DD is upset, back later.

[suse]

I honestly didn't know the definitions of the terms, and I wasn't really interested anyway.

Oh well. I hope you got some benefit from the info, and if not, I'm sure someone else will find it useful

[echidna]

The info was great Suse, but I more came in here for a general chat about agnosticism rather than talking about definitions.

[Aimz]

What would you like to chat about echidna?

[paradise lost]

I have prayed in my lifetime. I have never prayed to have more money though, or better health or anything like that. I have only ever prayed (to the general ether, since my beliefs don't fit into any particular religion) for the strength to bear what is happening, and to date my prayers have ALWAYS been answered.

Suse the terminology was helpful, thanks. What amuses me slightly is that i too am scientific and in science there are MANY more questions than answers. Even a small look at particle physics reveals many strange effects which cannot be explained in any way that fits in with our understanding of the laws of physics. The more we know, the less rigid the "laws" become. So how the "scientific" approach of knowledge rather than faith remains is somewhat mysterious. The existence of a higher power cannot be proved, but if one already believed the proof would be all around. A non-believer accepts no proof and a believer needs none.

Even quite simple things which we all feel we have a strong grasp of remain incredibly mysterious. Look at our treatments for cancer. Cut it out, poison it, irradiate it. Because we don't know WHY cancer begins, and thus we cannot figure out how to STOP cells turning cancerous. The best we can do is cut them off after the event. Even with cervical cancer - we now know and can vaccinate against the strains of a virus which make it far more likely that cervical cells with become malignant, but we cannot prevent it once the infection is present!

I suppose i am reluctant to denounce anything unproven just because it is. Once the world was flat.

Bx

[echidna]

How do you talk about festivities without them being religious? Such as naming ceremonies, civil weddings, funerals (of those who aren't religious), and of religious holidays?

I don't go to church at christmas or easter, I spend my time with my family. My DD doesn't know what santa does either. I will tell her he's the christmas man who makes everyone happy, and its nothing to do with presents.

Do you raise your children in a non-religious way? I hope to take DD to service every now and then when she is older, for her to understand, and choose to learn more if she wishes.

[Roryrory]

Do you raise your children in a non-religious way?

Absolutely. I am a big Christmas fan, but to me Christmas is all about the tree, the food and the presents. The religion part is, to me, just something that is an interesting little facet that I acknowledge but don't really participate in. I love Christmas carols though, and ironically, one of my faves is "O Come all ye Faithful".

Now, on to my point - I have always believed I would show the boys about the religious side of Christmas as an historical/other people thing (as in "this is what some people believe, we don't, but some do"). And I am big on introducing the boys to the wonders of Christmas, so I bought them a Wiggles Christmas DVD.

But when it actually came down to the religious parts of it (and boy, there is a lot of religion in that DVD!) I found I felt really uncomfortable in showing it to Flynn. I just couldn't let him watch "Away in a Manger"!

I realised that I am all for my boys being exposed to other firm ideas on religion once they are already atheists like me and their dad. (On that point their dad is definately atheist, I sway slightly towards agnosticism, though not much). But I do not feel comfortable with the boys having any exposure to religious stuff aimed at them, as children, because I don't want them sucked in to it before I can get a chance to show them how their dad and I chose to live.

And funnily, in typing this, I have realised I now completely understand religious types wanting to send their kids to religious schools. Its the same thing, isn't it? We want our children to share our beliefs. I guess the religious parents want their children to believe in god so they can be "saved" and all, or get into a better level of heaven or whatever, but essentially we want the same thing.

I suppose i am reluctant to denounce anything unproven just because it is. Once the world was flat.

Hoobley, I am a bit like you on this one, but my staunch-atheist husband would come out with he wouldn't believe anything without proof. Sounds like its arguing in circles, huh? My DH generaly says he would completely believe, support and accept a person who says they went out into a field and met an angel who gave them the word of god in a book, but has little time for someone who professess to have "faith". I gotta say that my shaky agnosticism gets even shakier, and usually after a long discussion I end up more towards atheism.

I hope you got some benefit from the info, and if not, I'm sure someone else will find it useful

I did Suse. IMO definitions and positions in this debate are quite important, because you are essentially arguing from a position of rationality and "proof" rather than more vague notions like faith and belief. I think it is only when someone has really defined their position that they have any hope of defending themselves against a fully worked out theological argument.

Atheism, on the other hand, is either non-belief in a higher power (known as 'weak' atheism) or denial of the existence of a higher power (known as 'strong' atheism).

I hadn't actually thought much about this before now. I guess, despite all my ramblings previously, I am actually a strong atheist? Cause I sure as hell don't think that there is an intelligent "design" or grand plan for all of life. I am open to the idea of connections between things and people that we can't current see or recognise, but not in a higher power.

I cheekily have a back up plan. I was very religious as a child as a result og being preyed upon by my religious ed teacher when my father was dying of lung cancer. The whole class used to pray for my dad, and I started going to Sunday school and learning bible verses. But my RE teacher stupidly gave me the baby-down version of Christianity - it was all "Jesus loves little children", pray and you shall receive, if you are good god will protect you. Well, that all was quashed when my dad actually died. I remember standing outside, when I was about 12, crying at the sky syaing god if you are there show me and I will believe. Well, there was nothing, so that was my "awakening" just as religious people often talk of that moment when they believed.

But back to my back-up plan. I was once religious. If the apocalypse comes, and god shows him/her/itself, I will repent and believe. Then I will be the prodigal daughter! I will be welcomed into the fold. And if I remember my bible story correctly, the prodigal son got to sit at the head of the table, while the son who had been good all along got the leftovers....

My atheist DH says I am a fraud for even thinking about a back-up plan LOL!!!