12

thread: 'Perfect' length of time for labour?

  1. #1
    You were RAK'ed in 2015.
    Add beansbeans! on Facebook

    May 2008
    with the fairies and butterflies
    2,535

    'Perfect' length of time for labour?

    I was reading about something or watching something today (in other words cant remember where I heard/saw this) and the subject was length (time) of labour.

    The comment was made by a woman who said her labour was very short and felt rushed. She said that the next time round she wanted a more perfect length of labour...

    It got me thinking what do you think is the perfect length of labour??

    I had one long labour (12hrs with dd1) and two short labours (less than 1.5hrs both times with dd2 and dd3). personally I preferred the shorter labours. My body responded to the shorter labours better. I dont have an opinion of what the perfect length of labour is though..

    But Im curious, your thoughts on the perfect length of labour... thats if there is one..

    And my apoligies if this makes little sense, its been a long day with three sicks girlies

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Sep 2007
    Brisbane
    5,729

    Is 12 hours short? First contraction to birth was more than 2 days for me! I really want a shorter one this time, but it can't really be longer can it? O.o

  3. #3
    You were RAK'ed in 2015.
    Add beansbeans! on Facebook

    May 2008
    with the fairies and butterflies
    2,535

    I dunno 12hrs could be short for some It was bloody long for me though

    Two days is definately not an ideal time to labour for though

  4. #4
    BellyBelly Member

    Jan 2010
    2,793

    I had 2.5-3hrs of 'active' labour. I too felt rushed, but to be honest, I think that for me that is better as it didn't give me time to really think about things and get stressed. That being said, when DD had just arrived I do remember thinking that I was a bit in shock as the whole thing happened so quick. I do hope for the same next time though.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Add MummaBee on Facebook

    Feb 2010
    NSW, Australia
    502

    Both mine were about 10ish hours which in my opion was to much pain for all thatb work
    If I was able to choose the length of Labour I think 3hours would be awesome.

  6. #6
    You were RAK'ed in 2015.
    Add beansbeans! on Facebook

    May 2008
    with the fairies and butterflies
    2,535

    Chody thats what I liked about my short labours, there wasnt time to get stressed or anything.
    But the short ones didnt feel rushed for me. Although I do remember thinking, 'is that it?'

    Mummabee I like the sound of 3hrs

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Add CKJ on Facebook

    Dec 2011
    Central Coast NSW
    502

    Anything is better than the 43 hours of regular intense 3min apart contractions I had!

    I don't think there is a perfect time length. Every woman's body reacts differently - although in saying that, if I can get my next labour to 1/4 of what I had last time I'll be thrilled!

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Apr 2006
    Perth
    4,203

    DD1 was loooooooooong - 34 hours - although that was made up of all sorts of 'bits' of labour rather than what was active labour. Way too long for my liking.

    DD2 was about 1.5 hours of niggles that I thought were still just pre-labour except for a trickle from my hind waters - uncomfortable not painful - and then 15 minutes of severely intense active labour. While it was great to have it all done very quickly and there was no time to even think about pain relief let alone get some, I went into shock after her birth. Not sure what would be the "perfect" length of labour, but more than 15 minutes would be nice.

  9. #9
    Registered User

    Sep 2007
    Brisbane
    5,729

    DD1 was loooooooooong - 34 hours - although that was made up of all sorts of 'bits' of labour rather than what was active labour. Way too long for my liking.

    DD2 was about 1.5 hours of niggles that I thought were still just pre-labour except for a trickle from my hind waters - uncomfortable not painful - and then 15 minutes of severely intense active labour. While it was great to have it all done very quickly and there was no time to even think about pain relief let alone get some, I went into shock after her birth. Not sure what would be the "perfect" length of labour, but more than 15 minutes would be nice.
    Oooh this gives me hope! I was hoping I'd "paid my dues" with DD1's labour and could have a much shorter one this time.

  10. #10
    Registered User

    Oct 2008
    Victoria
    4,601

    Although I do remember thinking, 'is that it?'
    This is how I felt about Buster's labour - was just under 2 and a half hours, and thought the exact same thing when it was time to push.

    My first was 22 hours and I was hoping for half that for my second! But it was 2 hours and 24 minutes to be exact and was fantastic

    I don't know if it was just my experience or if this is usual for faster labours...but I felt that the contractions were sooo intense much sooner the second time. That was the most challenging - not having time to ease into it.

  11. #11
    You were RAK'ed in 2015.
    Add beansbeans! on Facebook

    May 2008
    with the fairies and butterflies
    2,535

    Contractions definately are more intense for shorter labours, but Im not so sure I liked how they escalate with the longer labour.. I remember thinking, oh these arent too bad I can handle this, then the next contraction came I would think, are you serious? this kills..

    I have no idea as to what constitutes the perfect length of labour. But the idea of being in labour for days so does not make me think oh yes I can handle that

  12. #12
    Registered User

    Apr 2006
    Perth
    4,203

    Hestia - I think that's it exactly. There's no warm up with things gradually building. Its not much of anything to absolutely everything in seconds.

    Maruschke - I hope you do get a shorter one this time - just not quite as short as my second ;-)

  13. #13
    Registered User

    Jan 2009
    pakenham, victoria
    3,660

    dd3 's birth was my perfect lenght, 3hrs annd 10 mins not too quick and not dragged out
    my others were all 12+ hours

  14. #14
    Registered User

    Mar 2006
    4,542

    My births were 3 1/2 hrs and then two at 2 1/2 hours. It's weird because my first I thought was way too quick at 3 1/2hrs (I went into shock after it but I think that was more because I went from 5cm to baby in arms in 50mins) but then both my next two labours where perfect lengths for me - I loved them all
    Such a birth junkie, LOL!!!

  15. #15
    Registered User

    Apr 2006
    Perth
    4,203

    Such a birth junkie, LOL!!!
    Any chance you can do my last one for me then lovely???

  16. #16
    Registered User

    Jul 2005
    Sydney
    7,896

    Loved DD2's labour and birth, fair amount of early/pre labour (over two days). Active labour noted as 1 1/2 hours by my m/w (but i felt it was more than pre labour for a couple of hours before) with another 50 mins of pushing.

    I will happily take exactly the same amount of labour again, but less second stage/pushing please! Although I wouldn't complain if it was the same again.

  17. #17
    Registered User

    May 2007
    3,220

    Both mine were about 4 hours. I thought it was the perfect length. I loved giving birth. Would happily give birth over being pregnant any day!

  18. #18
    Registered User

    Feb 2010
    on a big patch of paradise.
    3,720

    DD2 labour was my perfect labour and I would love it to go like that again next time. 22.5 hours of a slow steady build up that never got painful.
    DD1 was a 12.5 hour labour on synto strapped to moniters on a bed or in a chair. While I still enjoyed this labour too, after having DD2 I know how much more intense an induced labour is and how much less you body controls over the synto.

12