It would be a good idea to give her pre warning that she wont be there. If you tell her once you are in labour she may not take you seriously or just turn up anyway. a few BB'ers have stories of unwelcome support people. So best not to say you are in labour at all if you can get away with it. I think there is an article on the main site about this.
If you are planning in breastfeeding you may want to use that as a reason for not having your mum there. That for the first hour or so after bubs is born that you will be the only one holding bubs due to the importance of bubs getting to know you and having that first feed without interference. So if she was there for the birth, she would not be allowed to hold for awhile, so isn't it better she turns up at the hospital when you are ready to share bubs. Just went to an ABA talk about this and was really interesting. More and more couples are keeping not only the first hour to themselves, but days and even weeks.
Thankfully for me anyone wanting to be at the birth is interstate, so I don't have to upset people. I know my MIL would have waited outside the birthing suite if she had the chance. So happy that did not happen as I had an emergency c-section and that would have meant she would have held DD for hours before I did, that I would not have coped with at all. Last time it was just DH, this time it will be DH plus a trainee midwife


Reply With Quote


Bookmarks