thread: "To Tame or to Trust?" Gentle parenting article about toddlers

  1. #1

    Dec 2007
    Australia
    1,095

    Thumbs up "To Tame or to Trust?" Gentle parenting article about toddlers

    I thought this article was just wonderful so I thought i'd share it.

    Toddlers: To Tame or To Trust by Naomi Aldort (from naturalchild.com)

    As a parenting counselor, I often get calls from bewildered and confused parents who say, "My baby was so angelic. Then one day the "monster" came out. I did everything right. He was born peacefully, he is still nursing on demand, still sleeps next to me, and I carried him all of the time. Why is he becoming so difficult now (at age 2, 3, or 4)?"

    What has happened is actually a wonderful result of a relationship of trust and a deep bonding fostered by healthy attachment. The young child trusts her parents absolutely, and in that trust she rightly assumes that they are on her side and that she is safe and welcome to spread her wings. The way young humans spread their wings, however, is not always convenient to adults.

    It is not convenient when the toddler needs to play with mud, experiment with water, take things apart, exert much energy or when he needs to be watched, held, and read to for hours. Most attachment parents do accept inconveniencing with love when the child is an infant and a baby. It is not convenient when the baby drools on us, gets us wet, messes the floor with food, or wakes us up seven times a night - yet in our trust we can see that those are her needs, and in our commitment to provide attachment, we accept those needs with love and without judgment. We don't try to teach our baby to stop drooling or to stop crying for her needs to be met. The transition from helpless baby to active toddler can mislead parents into a change in approach, from one of total trust and acceptance to one of teaching and struggle.

    One father confessed to me that he regretted the attachment approach he and his wife had practiced with their daughter. At age four, she was "wild and demanding" while their friend's child, who "grew up in a crib" and attended day care, was "so cooperative".

    Because I have heard this report many times from different parents, I cannot say that this is just a difference in the children's personalities. The real question is whether that other child is really cooperative, or is she actually compliant and resigned? Is the bonded and trusting child really "wild and demanding" or simply alive, trusting, and assertive? Maybe the difficulty is not in the child but in our attitude and approach as parents. Maybe what is needed is an extension of the attachment attitude with all the trust, validation and respect that comes with it - for many more years.

    While many aspects of the more intensive attachment period do begin to fade as the child grows, there are some parental traits that remain essential: trust, leadership, and compassion. If we can retain these qualities in our parenting, then we will find life with toddlers a lot less stressful and profoundly fascinating.

    We may recall that we trusted our baby. We didn't insist that he learn to hold a spoon before he was ready, or walk before he chose to. Later on, we didn't insist that he talk before he was able to talk. Attachment is being "in tune" and responding to the child at each stage, trusting that his intention to mature is even more urgent than ours. The toddler is already in a rush - pushing her even faster to live up to our expectations can only give her a feeling of failure, resulting in a lowered self-esteem and difficult behavior. With an attitude of trust, we can continue to assume that whatever the toddler does is what she needs to do - just as we trusted her as a baby. Of course, there are times when what the child needs to do is unsafe or otherwise unallowable. At those times we can validate the child's feelings of disappointment, sadness or rage, and when relevant, offer a similar but safer activity.

    To better understand the leadership role of the parent, the best place to start is with what it is not. Leadership does not mean judgment of the child, nor is it controlling, teaching, or directing. Leadership is not an attempt to get the child to be a certain way for our convenience or approval. Instead, leadership is based on trust and respect for who the child is at each stage of her life. We can lead by creating a safe environment instead of limiting the child, as much as possible. We can provide leadership by noticing what the child needs and creating the conditions for meeting that need in a safe way. She may need a space to run and scream; she may need the outdoors in order to climb, get muddy, and throw stones in the water; she may need to experience independence and autonomy by making a mess of her toys or clothes. She also needs us to stop her from taking unsafe or unsuitable actions. She relies heavily on this kind of leadership because without it she cannot dare to spread her wings further and further.

    When leadership is insufficient, the child feels he has no one to rely on and trust. The results of lack of appropriate leadership and lack of trust and respect add up over time and result in stress, self-doubt, and a sense of insecurity. The child feels lost and is likely to keep doing things that he hopes may force his parents into leadership - things that parents often perceive as "misbehaving" or as being overly demanding.

    Most of this type of difficulty can be avoided with an attitude of trust and with leadership that is rooted in empathy and respect. No one likes to be told what to do - least of all toddlers. To respect this quality about the child, and to be on her side means to lead the way by following her needs based on her cues. Instead of trying to stop her from spilling water on the floor, we can provide a hose outdoors or time in the bathtub. Instead of getting upset with the child for refusing to put pajamas on, we can respond to her need to play the "run away from the pajama" game. Most of the time, a true leader follows.

    As a result, the child trusts the parent, and when it is necessary to lead by negating the child's choice of action, the child will follow more easily, knowing "my Mom/Dad is on my side".

    Most parents seem to be leaders when their child is a baby. We trust and accept the baby for who she is at each stage of her life, and at the same time we are also the managers of family life. When we have to leave the store - we leave, if the baby cries we hold, validate and meet the need. When a diaper needs to be changed we change, and if the baby is upset by the process, we again validate her feelings as we change it. If she is putting an unsafe item in her mouth, we remove it and offer an alternative. The baby counts on us to guard her and stop her from doing anything that is not good for her or for others. She will try anything, counting on us to step in for her safety. She relies heavily on her parents. Likewise, the toddler also counts on us to guard her and stop her from doing damage.

    Limits

    I actually never use the words "setting limits" with my children or with parents I counsel. Sometimes we need to inform our children of limits that are not self-evident, yet we need not add anything to the existing limits of the physical and social reality. The frustration of the young child is so great precisely because she keeps encountering limits all the time. Much of modern life, with its technology, travel, and rush of stimuli, can be too intense for little ones. Not only does the overload create stress, but we are also forced to impose many limits that make no sense to the child and lead to stress-related behavior ? such as requiring seat belts, stopping running in the parking lot, not allowing playing with electricity, and so on.

    Happily, most limits are their own teachers and we need not intervene. In fact part of our duty is to reduce the amount of helplessness in our child's life, by removing a few limits out of our environment. I find limiting the number of limits in a toddler's life helps her flow more peacefully with those she is ready to encounter. At the same time, we need not take away challenge and frustration from the child's life. We can trust his choices and inclinations. Frustration is a healthy stepping-stone for growth as long as it is not organized by anyone outside the child herself.

    My youngest son Oliver, at 3 years, climbs rocks on the beach. I stand by ready. Soon he says "it's scary" and asks me for help to come down. I assist him in descending off the rock, I do not lift him off easily to the ground. How does he know to be scared of being high? He learned about the physical limit of gravity through falls, falling towers of blocks, and other daily experiences. Now he learned another dimension of gravity and heights. Life is the teacher. He created the challenge and the frustration, and he counted on me for his safety. If he didn't trust me, he wouldn't have dared to challenge himself. Self-confidence results from this ability of the child to move beyond his own limits.

    By maintaining this attitude of trust, we can assume that whatever the child does is what she needs to do - just as we trusted the baby. We can keep our impositions to a minimum and guard the child's safety as she meanders through the endless line of limits and breakthroughs. If an activity has to be interrupted, the child's trust in our leadership will help her to accept the rarely-imposed limit. When we have to leave the playground, we can take our child home as gently as possible and validate her crying with words, listening, and hugs.

    We cannot save our child from life's hurts and frustrations. It is not even desirable since it can only weaken him. What we can do is be compassionate companions on his unique and personal "ride". He will then learn to experience life's many faces, and to value empathy and closeness. Most of all, he will gain emotional resilience and confidence in his ability to overcome adversity.

  2. #2
    Registered User

    Jan 2006
    8,369

    One father confessed to me that he regretted the attachment approach he and his wife had practiced with their daughter. At age four, she was "wild and demanding" while their friend's child, who "grew up in a crib" and attended day care, was "so cooperative".
    Attachment parent here who uses day care. Nowt wrong wi' that. DS is 90% of the time an absolute angel but given that he's only just 2 we know it won't be for much longer - and I'm thrilled that he trusts us enough to test boundaries and spread his wings. But then I let him get muddy because I think he learns and I know he enjoys it.

    Interesting about leading by following. DS every now and then goes through a month or so of needing to be coaxed to have a bath. DH thinks we should just pick him up and force him into it (usually right at the end of this mini-rebellion)... I play a hide-and-seek game then play with the bath duckies until DS wants to join in with the bath. He's back to loving baths again and wanting to bath and bed at 7pm. But even though he has 10 minutes tearing around the house and giggling, he still knows it's bathtime and he's having a bath. There are rules, we stick to them - but we have fun too!

    DS is fashion boy - the amount of comments I have that he looks like a model! He insists on picking his own outfits (I buy the clothes so the outfits all look great) and now is picking what he wants in the shops: some shirts are pointed out and wanted, others I will show him and receive a decided "no." Same with shoes - the ruddy designer pair DS nodded and stuck his feet out to try them on, the other pairs "no" and hide the foot. So now my 2-year-old wears lace-up kickers. Please don't let his feet grow for another six months or more! But the tantrums that ensue if we tell him what to wear... DS strips himself off again rather than wear the owl top when he wanted a rugby top.

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Jul 2005
    Sydney
    7,896

    This makes me feel sooooo much better about my DD who some mornings seems to wake up as 'Contrary Mary' as we sometimes call her!

  4. #4

    Dec 2007
    Australia
    1,095

    Attachment parent here who uses day care. Nowt wrong wi' that. DS is 90% of the time an absolute angel but given that he's only just 2 we know it won't be for much longer - and I'm thrilled that he trusts us enough to test boundaries and spread his wings. But then I let him get muddy because I think he learns and I know he enjoys it.
    I don't agree with this automatic assumption that daycare is detrimental, it can be very beneficial particularly for the social aspect.

  5. #5
    paradise lost Guest

    I don't agree with this automatic assumption that daycare is detrimental, it can be very beneficial particularly for the social aspect.

    I don't think it's saying that daycare is detrimental, just that it's not strictly Attachment Parenting to use daycare. In the same way as it's not strictly Gentle Discipline to use time-outs, but many of us do, and still consider ourselves to be using GD.

    I personally fail to see the benefit of the "social aspect" of daycare over DD being with me doing our normal stuff. It kind of assumes that the primary carer and people one encounters in normal life don't "count" as people. It's not that i think it's detrimental, i just see it as benign - neither better or worse.

    Bx

  6. #6
    Registered User

    Dec 2007
    Victoria
    7,260


    I personally fail to see the benefit of the "social aspect" of daycare over DD being with me doing our normal stuff. It kind of assumes that the primary carer and people one encounters in normal life don't "count" as people. It's not that i think it's detrimental, i just see it as benign - neither better or worse.

    Bx
    I can absolutely see the social aspect to day care! Charlotte needs to learn how to interact with other CHLDREN, not just the people in our immediate circle, which unfortunately (and why I see the need for C to go to cc VERY soon) is VERY small. And the children I do know that are her age are quite frankly, not people I want her learning how to behave from iykwim!

    Charlotte is wonderfully social, she is accepting of people and wary although not scared of people she doesnt know. All in all she is doing fantastically with her socialisation. Yet I still recognise the need for her to be with other children and not just me all the time.

    I think all that is highly dependent on individual circumstance though. I see my mothers group very rarely. I know you are planning on having other kids, where as we arent, so I feel it is important that she learn how to share and play with another child successfully very early. As I said we dont have a large circle of friends with kids her age here in Perth, but if we did I would consider cc to be much less important from that social perspective.

    I certainly disagree though that the assertion of cc for social reasons implies we are not people. It simply indicates quite accurately that mum is not 15 other children. Their interactions are completely different, and incomparable imo.

  7. #7
    Registered User

    May 2007
    Perth, WA
    839

    Thanks for the article Neenee- a great read.
    Limeslice, I can't agree with all that you have said and although people's circumstances vary, there are still some commonly held beliefs about children and socialisation.
    [QUOTECharlotte needs to learn how to interact with other CHLDREN][/QUOTE] Yes she does eventually but she doesn't just now at her age. Your immediate family is fine- even if it is just you or your partner.
    Yet I still recognise the need for her to be with other children and not just me all the time
    What is wrong with being with 'just' you all of the time? This is actually all that she wants and needs at her age.
    I feel it is important that she learn how to share and play with another child successfully very early
    She will learn to share and play at the time that is right for her. this usually happens around the age of 3 or 4. Being made to do so any earlier is neither wise nor helpful to her development.
    She really doesn't need interactions at this age- she really needs her mum to be around her. She will learn from you and how you interact in the supermarket, on the phone, at the bank etc more than from any other child.
    Please don't think I am picking on you. It just really intrigues me why people put children into care for 'socialisation' reasons when childcare doesn't offer this to a child at this age. It is a real misunderstanding of the psychological needs of the child.

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Jun 2008
    Tassie
    2,567

    I have found family day care great for a few reasons. They learn to thrive in an environment that isn't home where I am They are with me almost 24/7 so it's great that they can do things without me and learn to be independent that way. Also I am liking the fact that they are learning that while one thing is ok with me it isn't with Helen their carer, and that she is the boss of her own home and they must respect that. There are many benifits to day care (having said that I am a new user as of this month and only my 2 oldest children)
    Katie I have to disagree with your comment regarding sharing. At a young age kids CAN learn to share and it can be benificial My boys were 14 months apart and by the time Chase was moving at 5 months Jaidan was sharing his toys and they grew up sharing with eachother and other kids. At 5 and almost 4 they are happy to share and since the age of 2 and 3 they used to tell other kids "sharing is caring" which was very cute!

    Great article
    Last edited by Visitor8; February 21st, 2009 at 09:58 PM. : adding stuff :)

  9. #9
    Registered User

    Jan 2007
    Sydney
    908

    Yes they can "share" etc (I have been teaching my friend's 2 yo who I babysit). The day that I work, I leave DS with my friend (the one whose daughter I mind - we do a swap). I agree that kids love to be around other kids - my DS loves the day that Simone comes over, or that he goes over to her place.

    But, I don't agree that sending them to childcare is the way to do this. What about playgroup or Mums' group? We go to both - so DS can interact with other kids, but not be left without me. I don't want my DS to be looked after by strangers at his age. For better or for worse, his parenting will be a reflection of me - not CC.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Add fionas on Facebook

    Apr 2007
    Recently treechanged to Woodend, VIC
    3,473

    I THINK I like/agree with the article but I found it a bit vague.

    I use "no" sparingly with DD for a lot of reasons:

    a) I think it's good that she experiments. Yes, I let her switch the bedroom light on and off before bed even though it means that she stands on a chest of drawers to do it and pushes me away so I can't stand too close to her.

    b) She is too young to understand the reason why I'm saying "no" half the time so I tend to use distraction. Though, ironically (as it's one of the examples that the author uses) I DO say no when she spills water on the floor because we have a concrete floor and it's dangerous because she goes flying and babies' heads and concrete floors are a bad combo. I do try to teach her why and say, "no spilling, spilling slippy" with a few flailing arm actions to demonstrate and get her to help me clean up. But after that happened five times in as many minutes, I may just restrict her to only drinking from a cup in her high chair. No, I'm not going to run a bath every time she has a spill and we don't have a backyard hose.

    As for the CC debate, I too think the socialisation thing is a furphy at this age. I take DD to Mothers Group and a playcentre. DD is very friendly to the adults, will wave her little hand off, go up to them, start pointing to her nose, their nose, everyone's noses but is not very interested in the other toddlers. We are lucky enough to qualify for a in-home carer who also works at a childcare centre and when I raised the issue of socialisation with her and what age should we start introducing DD to childcare for socialisation, even she said it was pointless at this age and to wait until DD is two or three. I'm not against CC - I use it because I have to as well but my reasons are financial/sanity not for DD's socialisation.

  11. #11
    Registered User

    Jun 2008
    Tassie
    2,567

    Yes they can "share" etc (I have been teaching my friend's 2 yo who I babysit). The day that I work, I leave DS with my friend (the one whose daughter I mind - we do a swap). I agree that kids love to be around other kids - my DS loves the day that Simone comes over, or that he goes over to her place.

    But, I don't agree that sending them to childcare is the way to do this. What about playgroup or Mums' group? We go to both - so DS can interact with other kids, but not be left without me. I don't want my DS to be looked after by strangers at his age. For better or for worse, his parenting will be a reflection of me - not CC.
    I did all these things too It wasn't until the last week that I have sent them to any sort of child care.
    I wouldn't call FDC a stranger though. They are no more a stranger then your friend once was One carer which they get to know and build a relationship with. We even visited a couple of times to get the boys used to her and get to know her a bit better. I wouldn't call her a stranger anymore.

  12. #12
    Registered User

    Jan 2006
    8,369

    Yeah, I'd be very "bad mummy" according to this article. I say no, I lift DS around whever he wants even down from high places, I use childcare (and, FWIW, DS had a week with me and we were out for three hours a day meeting new people and animals and DS was bored senseless with this - even with new people every day! - so much so that he ASKED to go to the creche at Church today for the first time in his life), treat DS as a CHILD and not a fully aware adult. And I don't think that's wrong.

    I didn't put DS in childcare for socialisation, I did it so I could work. But it hasn't hurt because I picked a "gentle" nursery for him: loads of cuddles and kisses, playing with what he wants when he wants and, best of all for DS, loads of other children with whom to play. I took him to playgroups and friends' houses but that didn't ever last all day like Nursery can. A 2-hour playgroup in the morning and a 2-hour park/friend visit in the afternoon does not cut it with DS.

    I will point out that MOST under-2s (and now 2yos) don't want this. My DS is just incredibly social and loves people. Even more than trains. But you can't say "all babies and toddlers just want mum" because although my baby only wanted me, my toddler doesn't. And I think it's great he got enough from me as a baby and young toddler to feel so secure that he now wants to socialise with others (children and adults) and is happy to do so away from me. His carers, even at Nursery, aren't strangers and I do know enough about them to be happy leaving DS with them.

    Childcare is SO personal and I know I'm doing the best for DS so this isn't a justification. And I would like to see debate on the greater article rather than just me taking umbridge about the "evil CC" comment when it just ain't so.

    The article is a lot about inspiring confidence in our children. I have done that without doing the same as this woman - although I do a lot similar. I let DS set the pace and rule our activities so that I can help him develop - whilst placing limitations (which I can explain when he asks "why", which has just started) upon what we do. DS is very "high maintainence" according to my friends (and his clothes budget LOL) but he's also VERY "well behaved" (ie knows how to behave in adult situations, such as a meal out). Yes, he explores the restaurant and spent a good half-hour enjoying a glass door at the entrance to the restaurant last night, but he also behaved as an adult should when the food arrived. He knows what my expectations of him are - that he sits still and eats - and also knows my tolerances for a 2-year-old - that he doesn't have to sit still before the food arrives and when he gets tired he can tell us and we leave asap. My expectations will never change and DS finds that more comforting than being forced to behave as an adult, because he isn't. But to the outside world, the snapshot of DS is that he is "compliant" because he wants all the compliments when we're out!