Agreed, I'm not a friend of Janet's and won't be visiting her forum again, but I wish people would stop attaching neonate mortality with her name. It must be distressing for those who DO know her (and there are members on BB who do) to see this done. She's a real person, someone who has birthed, like you and me and I wouldn't want to be the flagbearer for an outcome that actually happens FAR more frequently in hospital settings because of the lack of continuity of care and the lack of awareness of complication indicators that experienced midwives know about and pick up on early because they see women labouring. IM's don't tend to tell women they'll be there and interested when they are nearly fully dilated. Hospital staff in maternity wards aren't that well-versed with normal birth as it occurs from beginning to end - they catch the end bit, that's why I ONLY wanted to present to our local FBC once I had laboured entirely at home, because hospy and FBC policy is determined by what THEY think is enough labouring time before intervention cuts in
Sorry, that is a bit long-winded, and the crux of it is that undisturbed birth has, by far, much better outcomes, even where there are complications (Marjorie Tew's book has great examples of this occurring in the UK over the last century and a bit, esp rural areas where GP's used to do these deliveries without specialist intervention...they were afforded the experience adn actually LISTENED to birthing women. They had to, they paid their wages, not hospital management teams!).
You see, birth is very political in our society. Birth is not birth is not birth. Peel away at the layers and you find a history of misogyny, privilege and subjugation of women with careers and experience with childbirth.
A read of this book can give you confidence in birthing outside of hospital settings![]()


Reply With Quote




Hi Tegam - I do hope my next labour isn't 10 mins - I just don't thinki dh could handle that!!
Bookmarks