I agree with HotI on the above point.

So based on that would not the desire to homebirth and the low chance of maternal/perinatal mortality be viewed in the same light as the desire to vaccinate with the low chance of lasting side effects/allergic reactions?
I'm confused by your argument to be honest. Based on "that"? What, the way you raised points and discarded them as not meaningful?

For example, your distaste for the term "birth rape" does not discount the fact that some women are assaulted, intimidated, treated with disrespect (the list goes on) during birth. These do create lasting traumatic experiences and oftentimes PTSD so I don't think you can wipe that out of the equation simply because of the term "birth rape".