thread: What was YOUR nuchal fold result/risk factor??

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Registered User

    Jan 2007
    rothwell,QLD
    1,135

    Hi, I was 34 and was 1:35, Scan was good but bloods were bad so I had amino done and went onto have a healthy baby.
    I hope everything is fine for you.

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Add 1MOREPLZ on Facebook

    Jan 2008
    sydney
    2,678

    Hi Leemar,

    i have since received my results from the amnio i had. I am 30 U/S was fine it was the bloods that came back 1:171 risk for trisomy 13/18 but amnio results came back all clear & i am having a little boy

  3. #3
    Registered User

    Jan 2007
    rothwell,QLD
    1,135

    Congratulations I am so happy everything is fine and a little boy too

  4. #4
    Registered User

    Feb 2008
    Country Victoria
    5,945

    um mine came back 1:60900...and 1:800

    im very happy with this but my bloods put me at a maternal age of 26 why is this??? seems i have bad blood....
    Last edited by [M]umma[M]ia; June 20th, 2008 at 06:48 PM.

  5. #5
    Registered User

    Nov 2006
    Somewhere Over The Rainbow
    3,094

    1/206.

    CVS was all clear

  6. #6
    Chippy Guest

    I'm confused by those super high numbers. On the little graph I have, no one goes above 1:6000.

    My T21 results were 1:4730 which gives me a maternal age of less than 15. I'm 29. I don't know what the others are but I'm assuming they're good 'cos they would have told me otherwise.

  7. #7
    Mumof2Girls Guest

    For Jen (when I was 30) I had a result of 1:217 and for this bub (I'm 33 now) I had a risk of 1:136. Both scans were fine but it was the bloods that went crazy. The genetic counsellor said that some women have a bit of a different blood chemistry which give the high risk results. Anyway, had a CVS with Jen and she was perfectly fine and had an amnio with this one and he's perfectly fine too

  8. #8
    Registered User

    Mar 2005
    Melbourne
    656

    I'm confused by those super high numbers. On the little graph I have, no one goes above 1:6000.

    My T21 results were 1:4730 which gives me a maternal age of less than 15. I'm 29. I don't know what the others are but I'm assuming they're good 'cos they would have told me otherwise.

    How unusual (your graph that is). Results from both of my pregnancies have been well above 1 in 6000 (over the age of 30 each time) so they most certainly can go above the upper limit on your graph. Weird ha? I'm pretty sure that I was not given a maternal age of less that 15 either, despite have a greater ratio than yours. Can't explain it though?

    ETA : Unless your graph give scan results only (not combined results from blood test AND scan)?

Similar Threads

  1. do you need to see GP for nuchal fold?
    By ttcno2 in forum Pregnancy - First Trimester General Discussion
    : 4
    : December 16th, 2006, 09:25 AM
  2. Nuchal fold thickness
    By LuluHB in forum Pregnancy - First Trimester General Discussion
    : 11
    : October 22nd, 2006, 12:17 PM
  3. Nuchal Fold?? soft marker for downs..
    By Rachel23 in forum Pregnancy - Second Trimester General Discussion
    : 9
    : September 8th, 2006, 05:57 PM
  4. Nuchal Fold Measurement - cant help but think
    By *Jessica* in forum Pregnancy Forums
    : 4
    : September 7th, 2006, 06:49 PM
  5. A question about Nuchal Fold ultrasound
    By mkstrle in forum Pregnancy - First Trimester General Discussion
    : 7
    : August 23rd, 2004, 05:42 PM