Hi, I was 34 and was 1:35, Scan was good but bloods were bad so I had amino done and went onto have a healthy baby.
I hope everything is fine for you.![]()
Hi, I was 34 and was 1:35, Scan was good but bloods were bad so I had amino done and went onto have a healthy baby.
I hope everything is fine for you.![]()
Hi Leemar,
i have since received my results from the amnio i had. I am 30 U/S was fine it was the bloods that came back 1:171 risk for trisomy 13/18 but amnio results came back all clear & i am having a little boy![]()
Congratulations I am so happy everything is fine and a little boy too![]()
um mine came back 1:60900...and 1:800
im very happy with this but my bloods put me at a maternal age of 26why is this??? seems i have bad blood....
Last edited by [M]umma[M]ia; June 20th, 2008 at 06:48 PM.
1/206.
CVS was all clear![]()
I'm confused by those super high numbers. On the little graph I have, no one goes above 1:6000.
My T21 results were 1:4730 which gives me a maternal age of less than 15. I'm 29. I don't know what the others are but I'm assuming they're good 'cos they would have told me otherwise.
For Jen (when I was 30) I had a result of 1:217 and for this bub (I'm 33 now) I had a risk of 1:136. Both scans were fine but it was the bloods that went crazy. The genetic counsellor said that some women have a bit of a different blood chemistry which give the high risk results. Anyway, had a CVS with Jen and she was perfectly fine and had an amnio with this one and he's perfectly fine too![]()
How unusual (your graph that is). Results from both of my pregnancies have been well above 1 in 6000 (over the age of 30 each time) so they most certainly can go above the upper limit on your graph. Weird ha? I'm pretty sure that I was not given a maternal age of less that 15 either, despite have a greater ratio than yours. Can't explain it though?
ETA : Unless your graph give scan results only (not combined results from blood test AND scan)?
Bookmarks