Labour with no drugs?

[Smoke Jaguar]

Unlike career or wardrobe choices that a woman makes, telling a woman that birth pain relief is 'her choice' in that same vein is just so misplaced. Birth doesn't care about the feminist movement. That little baby couldn't care less about choice or the wonders of medical science. I hear it all the time; "if you need the drugs, take them", as if somehow when it comes to birth, is all about you and only you - what about the kidlet? Many women conveniently (or just so preoccupied with fear) forget to ask about the effect of the drugs on the baby, and if they took the time to look into THAT side of things, they'd probably start working towards a natural birth pronto!
I hate to rain on the 'take what's on offer' parade (actually, no, I don't hate raining on that parade ); don't kid yourself, there are currently no 'birth drugs' that don't cross the placenta to affect the baby. Many babies go on to have great health and great starts to life, and many (a LOT) are adversely affected by drugs - side effects are poor breast attachment, poor breathing, overly sleepy babies, 'floppy' babies etc. Not to mention that there is no proper study to track psychological health in individuals born under a drug haze...I don't suppose a longitudinal study of that nature would have much support, let alone funding.
Anyway, analytical and empirical stuff aside, YES, you can have a wonderful, drug-free birth and come out feeling fantastic. I did, and I resent being told that I fluked it I prepared, visualised, relaxed and researched (well, I WAS studying at the time, and it was great for procrastination!). Just look at my signature for my testimonial. It's nice to give birth and be able to be instantly responsive to a baby who is instantly responsive to you

[BamBam]

Both my labours were drug free - the first time because they would have been useless as he was well on his way out, the second time was because I made a conscious decision I could do it drug-free.
And I did. All 27 minutes of it - lol.
Eh maybe not such a feat
DS 1 was 8 pound 6 and DS2 was 9 pound 10 and not a stitch in sight.

Labour itself isnt too bad, but the crowning burns like nothing I've ever felt before, it's kind of a satisfying feeling though, cause it doesn't last forever.

p.s Mayaness - agree totally very glad I made a drug-free choice!

Just read Kelly's post, and was reminded of the midwife I had when i was in labour with DS1. She kept saying "push! you need to push!" and I'm panting "No! I don't need to push!"
I think she got a little annoyed, but I got a little annoyed too when she turned to the nurse and said "if this baby's not out in the next 10 minutes, we're going to slice her."

um. b!tch.

[Lulu]

KK - the term is BIATCH!!

My mum was in labour for 32 and 29 hours. He eldest daughter (me!) had her first in 4 hours and her last in 2.5. Her youngest daugher had hers in 8.
Genetics can't possibly have everything to do with it. Don't think your fate is sealed yet!!!

Educate yourself, and don;t be afraid to ask questions.....ok?

[teachmum]

So if I don't manage a drug free 'natural' birth them I am somehow an incompotent mother? What about women who try as hard as they can but their babies heads are wedged in their pelvis and need emergency cs?

It is fantastic that women on this forum are educated and passionate about empowering women but sometimes it almost comes across sounding just like those pushy ob's that insist on subsequent cs or induction.

Just some food for thought.

[paradise lost]

That's the problem with extremes Teachmum. The response to one extreme is always the other extreme.

Of COURSE some women and babies will benefit from judicious use of drugs - it's just that a awful lot of women end up only needing drugs because of intervention.

The "cascade of intervention" is not a myth, it happens to SO many women. In an ideal women would not fear birth, and would not seek to avoid a pain they knew was a positive thing. If that were the case midwives and obs would be SO used to seeing normal women labouring naturally they wouldn't interpret the normal sounds women make during labour as a desperate need for pain relief (that is a tough call, for almost all medical practitioners the easing of pain is a really important part of the job, it's hard to "switch it off" when the climate is not that labour pain is normal and healthy and ok but that it's agony and should be medicated asap), women wouldn't be offered drugs, wouldn't take drugs, wouldn't need drugs and complications like women who can't push effectively (epidural compication), baby's head getting stuck (deep transverse arrest, epidural complication), failure to progress (common after morphine administration), distressed baby (more likely during artificial augmentation of labour, often given to speed things up after morphine has slowed it down), "flat" (non-breathing) newborn (much more common after morphine/pethidine administration/epidural and c-section) would happen much less often. I know about 3 people (and i know ALOT of people) who had complications which were not caused or worsened by external interferance. Even fear, normal fear in normal women, can cause MASSIVE problems for labouring women, and yet how many women even on here have been told "If your baby isn't out in an hour/20 minutes i'm going to cut/use forceps/section you"? That is a PHYSICAL THREAT! And these threats are made routinely, and women tolerate it!

Women should be able to rely on their careproviders to support them, to tell them that labour pain is not injurious and that they can absolutely cope with it, but in the current medicalised birthing climate, sadly we cannot.

No-one is judging anyone by saying that drugs are dangerous, we are telling the truth. And if WOMEN will not tell women that birth is ok and for the vast majority of people (80-90%) can absolutely be done drug-free, then who will?

Bx

ETA - Mayaness, no-one has thus far been able to produce any detrimental effects on newborns from entonox use during labour. It is cleared from the mothers blood upon the 2nd breath of normal air, and, they theorise, IF it gets across the placenta the first breath clears it from the newborn. They've never been able to detect it in newborns or in cord blood and studies have shown identical outcomes for entonox only and totally drug-free labours. I did not know this until after my labour, when guilt made me look it up (because i had used it). In the USA they do not even OFFER entonox.

[LimeSlice]

Everyone seems to be fairly on to it, so I wont (try) not to repeat them! lol

Firstly, do what feels right for you and dont let ANYONE no matter their opiion make you feel bad for YOUR choice - it is hard!
I know lots of women who have done it naturally and EVERY SINGLE ONE all say that the high afterwards is like nothing on earth! the pain is gone instantly anyway. (even from an ex heroin addict, she says that it was ewasy staying of the drugs after J was born because no drug could ever live up to the high of giving birth)

Secondly, expect - and PLAN - for the unexpected. I wanted a natural birth, refused to have forceps used even, and threatened to go to another hospital (and hour away) when i was actually in labour because i refused to see the doctor that was on call at the hospital (long story) because I knew he would use tham anyway and had disregarded my wishes ot go natural. As it turned out, they found me a new doctor, and just as well, because Charlotte was in distress and when they broke my waters, it was a Level 2 (bad) so i had to have an emergency C/S anyway! All my and DF's planing and hypno techniques were useless cause after 36 hours of labour at home i came to the hospital t be told she wasnt coming naturally anyway!! lol
So ranting aside, just be aware that youre plan may need to be flexible anyway you go, and know that you WILL be all right, even it seems everything is going all wrong!!

Good luck with whatever you decide!

[fionas]

As Limeslice has said, read up and come up with something that suits you.

An approach that suits one person may not suit another. For instance, towards the end of my pregnancy I started becoming quite stressed about the fact that I wanted a natural birth but what if I couldn't do it without drugs. Now some people would say, "oh, just keep telling yourself that you can do it, believe in yourself, believe in your body." That's exactly what some people need to hear, just a little bit of extra encouragement but I can literally make myself sick with worry (have lost 20 kgs and most of my sanity in the past doing this) so I was putting WAY too much pressure on myself. So I decided instead to go with a "I'm going to do my best and use all my pain management techniques but the drugs are there as back-up."

What I'm trying to say is that there's a fine line between motivating yourself for a natural birth and putting too much pressure on yourself. Only you know where that line is.