But aluminium does interfere with the results. Look at the difference between side effects between the shot and the alum "placebo", there's only 10% difference. But the reactions between the saline and the vax are times 100. What difference would that have made if the "real" placebo was used for the whole control group. Also, Aluminium is an adjuvant, right? We know it effects the immune system. How are we to know that it didn't weaken the immune system, allowing HPV in those in the control group to take hold within the cervix to create the lesions explaining the difference? We don't. Are the increase in lesions a result of not being vaccinated or the result of a weakened immune system through aluminium overload? With this method of "study", and I use the term lightly, we don't know. This study does not address concerns, in fact it only creates more.