HotI I appreciate you are not a fan of this form of monitoring. Truth be told, neither am I. But as you say the women reading this need the facts, and the facts are that internal monitoring involves a small scratch on the baby's skin and a very tiny piece of wire placed there to monitor bloodflow. It does not screw into the baby's skull, it is not deep, and most of the time the mark is gone from the baby shortly after birth. It is probably unpleasant for the baby, but the process of birth (being compressed, squeezed and denied oxygen for periods of time) is unpleasant for the baby and the internal monitor could be compared to the discomfort of a cannula being placed during contractions for the woman. In situations like this I don't believe emotive language helps and there are many times when an internal monitor is a good decision which saves a woman from an unnecessaarean.
Bookmarks