What do you want to talk about echidna?
ETA: Just reading back on earlier posts in the thread, and a few people have questioned the difference between agnosticism and atheism. This is not intended to challenge anybody's personal interpretation of the concept of agnosticism, as there are accepted interpretations that do deviate from the original meaning of the term. But I thought I'd throw in a bit of the history and provenance of the concept of agnosticism for anyone interested.
Agnosticism literally means 'without knowledge' (from 'gnosis' - to know). It is a philosophical stance whereby the holder acknowledges that the reason for, or source of existence is unprovable. The concept was originally developed in the 19th century by TH Huxley, who defined it as being "...wrong for a man to say he is certain of the objective truth of a proposition unless he can provide evidence which logically justifies that certainty. This is what agnosticism asserts and in my opinion, is all that is essential to agnosticism." Agnosticism is an intellectual concept; its core tenet is a rejection of the unprovable. It is not that an agnostic is open to the possibility of existence of a higher being, but that it cannot be proven.
Atheism, on the other hand, is either non-belief in a higher power (known as 'weak' atheism) or denial of the existence of a higher power (known as 'strong' atheism).





Reply With Quote

Bookmarks