Well after a while I thought I'd have another look at this thread as it's become a hybrid of many things.
To explain why I posted it? Because their is an excellent 'trick' in groups and even forums and even sunsets of community. The implied opinion.
Yes no one can make you "feel" anything. It's often a tool used in behavioural modification; to imply that change comes from within and false beliefs are your own. Granted and very useful in counselling and in lovely shiny textbooks, but remotely useful in life choices.
The we feel many things based on the environment we are in. Walk into a room at a party and "feel" the coldness. The perception may be wrong but for many it is real.
Sic
We have, after a massive effort, to move to formula feeding alone. It's interesting when in a parents room. No one will come out and verbalise anything against you making that choice (which is your own and no one else's) but there is an "atmosphere", that she's the odd one out.
I'm not posting to challenge the performance of BB dealing with CS. I appreciate the positive impact the site has for those making informed birth choices. I am also aknoweldging those who have had a journey that has affected them deeply. I hope that someday you are at peace with your feeling emotions and outlooks. I don't want to get into a further discussion about those I may have ignored or not been aware of.
Whether you agree or not, there are many in society who feel that their life choices are condemned not directly but by inference or even more subtle underpinnings.
There are parents who are left feeling guilty about their CS choice. Who caused it isn't so much the problem as the fact that they are. The fact that so much emphasis is placed on less interventional births, by exclusion the CS family and mother could be left unnecessarily questioning their choice.
Many minority and excluded groups in society are left to question their validity by societies unspoken "atmosphere". no one makes them feel this way but underlying attitudes can coerce emotions and choices
The simple notion of elective versus emergency give the connotation that unless you have a distressed baby with a slowing hear rate then every other CS is unnecessary.
Clearly this is wrong.
How about need versus not needed? Our CS was needed. An emergency? No. But no less necessary for the survival of our child.
Even the term "unnecessarean" that I see floating around websites could have a negative effect on some.
Why should they? To satisfy those who believe that there are too many CS being done? I shouldn't think so. How about worry about getting your own birth right for you and leave the decision making to us? A mother is no less a mother by the way her child arrives.
So I suppose that the point was that not every Caesarean mum does or needs to feel that their birth journey is a loss. It is not yours to influence despite the most noble of intentions. Not every mother/family needs to question their journey looking as though somehow they have failed. It was also meant to perhaps create some reflection on how your opinions can actually influence others positively and negatively.
So it was meant to be an uplifting post really for those that have been down the Caesar path.



Reply With Quote
(no, not about the man boobs, haven't seen them to make my own conclusions!!) I think it's always a good idea to hang back and ask some caring questions about someone who's just told you they had a c-s, cos you don't know what she's feeling about it. Sometimes it's just not the right time to suggest that the medicos were unjustified, or that the medicos brought about the c-s in the first place. Some women take ages to be ready to hear this and if you tell them too soon they clam up or get very defensive, and it could very well feel like they brought it on themselves. That's why 'shoulding' people is not constructive. On the other hand, you may be talking to someone who weighed up all options, not just the ones convenient to a c-s and came to decide upon just that.


Creator of 
Bookmarks