I know what you mean Sarah and it's frustrating because take a medical example, it depends what research the Obs choose to read. There is STACKS of research about the benefits of delayed cord clamping dating years back right up to 2007, but so many Obs are still sprouting that it is more dangerous leaving it to clamp, in case of jaundice etc, when all their objections have been dismissed by the studies, including the WHO. And also hospitals refuse to adopt the policies like delayed clamping... it's a joke! Best care? Or best defensive/convenient practice? There are many things that are not best for women and babies being practiced in this day and time, so now, more than ever, its so important for women to inform themselves and research to find out their own answers and make their own decisions.
ps. I know what ren meant, they (controlled crying methods) do appear to work for some babies but studies show these babies have learnt to give up asking for help as they know the wont get it, and the concern is they will become submissive in personality and not voice their needs. A study in a parenting magazine found around 50% of mums had tried CC, and only around 5-8% said it had worked in the short term. So many professionals recommend something that 'works' for such a small percent of babies? Because no-one wants to hear that there is no quick and easy way to help your baby learn to settle. It takes time and trust.
Creator of 
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks