Bon, I interpret it to mean that they are highlighting not only the possible dangers of FF, but also their frustration at the tactics used by Nestle to find loopholes and undo all the work that pro-BF gorups are trying to do in the 3rd world and underprivleged/under-educated areas. To see it from their point of view it must be like walking around in circles, constantly repeating yourself - for every bit of headway they make in educating these groups of people, Nestle are right there behind them. if Nestle spend up to $20 (or pounds) per baby trying to get mothers to use formula, then they must lobby government to spend $21 IYKWIM? And I say this as a Mum who did FF (and to explain why is unnecessary). I am not pro this or anti that - but I am for what ever is best for babies.

It would be naive to think that many of the governments in the 3rd world are not corrupt, who would gladly take kickbacks and incentives from companies to encourage use of their products because governments control the hospitals where babies are being born. Yes there is legislature in place to ensure correct labeling and advertising, but they find another way around it.

I assume that like most groups, Pro BF ones are seriously underfunded and just can't do as much as they would like to go to these places, not only 3rd world, but in 1st world where there are many underprivleged mothers and give them the tools to be able to successfully feed their children. And not only that but to change social perspectives of BF.