Hubby and I are fortunate not to have suffered with fertility problems (we are both under 30), but if we did, we would undergo extensive mutual detoxing and Naturopathic pre-conceptual care, and if after that we could still not fall pregnant naturally, we would be turning to adoption before IVF. I fully understand the desire to have ones own biological child, but I could never see myself being one of those people who are willing to sell their cars, houses, and their sanity in order to conceive a child through IVF, when there are so many underpriviledged babies and children out there desperate for a good home, and someone to call mother. I'm still thinkin of adoption even though I know I can conceive naturally!! I think Brangelina have set an awesome example by adopting children from 3rd world countries. That alone tells me that it is highly unlikely they would have gone to the extent of IVF to conceive twins.... Just doesn't fit the picture IMO!!! Ok, I'll shut up now!!
I am under 30 and have fertility issues! It is not always a function of age!.

Detoxing and naturopathic preconception care is a great idea, but doesnt always work.

Sanity does not need to be sold to undergo IVF, although these women do go through an incredible emotional rollercoaster each cycle.

Not all women are allowed to adopt. The waiting list is huge, it is incredibly expensive, and there are not as many children that we are allowed to adopt, even if we want to. The application process is incredibly invasive and doesn't guarantee an adopted child at all.

For some women, IVF is the only way they can fulfil their biological (natural) desire for a child. This is what IVF is for, its not a twin factory, and it shouldnt be used for fertile women who can conceive naturally (im ok with same sex couples and single women using it).

YES i find it offensive. Offensive, and incredibly hurtful. Its like a slap in the face.