Thanks guys. I really didn't think we'd be thinking about this at all, and probably wouldn't be if AF wasn't such a stark reminder or what a ***** my reproductive organs are. To the person who asked which was worse...children closer together or none at all, I'd definitely prefer closer together. No more children would break my heart.

As well as wanting to complete our family by 30, I want to finish a degree in that time also. So 3 years between children and a 3 year degree makes it a rather tight squeeze. I'm thinking more and more that it's looking like we may be completing our family into our 30's. So although on the face of it we have a good 8 years up our sleeves, it will be tight. And although it is something thy is important to DH and I that we be done by 30 (DH's dad died last year, he was 74 ) it's looking like it will have to be flexible. My uterus and tubes are just going to get worse and worse. I got PID from a d&c 3 years ago that left a lot of scarring in my uterus and tubes, and my left tube is partially blocked. The PID has reoccurred once since then which left more damage. Add PCO into the mix, only ovulating randomly and sometimes not at all, and having a luteal phase that jumps from 5 to 16 days, and possible endo. The FS also mentioned DH's sperm condition will start to deteriorate after the age of 30. So I'm feeling torn...do we TTC earlier than anticipated (in 6 months) on the assumption that it will take ~2 years to conceive again, running the risk that we may get pregnant sooner than we hoped (by about a year)...or do we TTC around the time we wanted, hoping we fall quickly? I'm still not quite sure which is 'worse' for me...a pregnancy a year earlier than we wanted, or one 2+ later. Either way, I'm going to make an appointment with my gyno and get everything checked out, see how everything is looking and go from there I guess. I really appreciate all this feedback.