thread: just an little "unnecessary intervention" vent

  1. #19
    Lucy in the sky with diamonds.

    Jan 2005
    Funky Town, Vic
    7,070

    that not everyone reading a thread like this will have had the opportunity to educate themselves and some of the statements here having a dig at the medical professionals MIGHT be enough for people to start doubting the intentions of their doctor

    I don't see this as a bad thing though...and a dr's words can be just as damaging too

  2. #20
    Registered User

    Mar 2009
    2,269

    I think it is also important to note that there are Obs who do take the time to discuss and explain things with their patient. I felt very well-informed by mine and I know many others who have had similar, positive experiences with theirs. Education is key but suggesting all Obs are not to be trusted seems a little bit dangerous considering some people DO need the support of a specialist (and there are many who are brilliant) and should not feel that they are doing the wrong thing by consulting with one and taking on board what they suggest/advise/have to say.

  3. #21
    Registered User

    Dec 2006
    In my own private paradise
    15,272

    i guess so much comes down to what you accept as gospel. my ob said even with full blown GD he doesn't set an induction date until he can see signs that there is risk to the baby or parent - he scans at every appointment - refuses to look for "large" baby - he ONLY checks blood flow through the cord to ensure there is no reason to take action. yes, some OB's may work differently to this, but again, it comes down to education.

    fortunately there IS a lot of information out there for pregnant women to access (in comparison to what you can access about something like carpel tunnel release surgery) - and so much of what you get from your doctor comes down to what you're prepared to ask. i don't walk out of any appointment without all my questions answered - it's something i refuse to do. but that's ME. i guess it comes back to society as a whole. if we (in general) want childbirth to be viewed as a natural and normal part of life, what need is there for you to be educated in detail by a medical professional?? there is a LOT of emphasis on ensuring Ob's are only involved in "abnormal" birth - that is their specialty. so it comes down to finding a balance of resources. why, if we want them ONLY involved in abnormal birthing situations, should they spend hours explaining to us what a "normal" birth involves.

    having specialised surgery (ie carpal tunnel release) isn't an every day event. child birth is. IF society wants child birth to STOP being seen as a "medical" condition (which i agree with) society as a whole, also needs to take responsibility for normal education - if it's not a "medical" condition why should "medical" professionals and "medical" resources be used to educate people???

    yes, i'm argumentative today (and i'm damn good at it ) but i'm trying to make a point - you can't expect the medical community to step away from the birthing process and yet still invest time and resource into educating as to what is and isn't normal. you can't judge those that aren't educated on what is normal for believing in the medical professionals around them if the only option to get information is via that same medical professional! if you want to de-medicalise birth, you need to de-medicalise the education process! you can't do a half-assed job of it!

    i will stand by my earlier statements that we need to be VERY careful how things are worded in a thread like this. yes, being told at 30 weeks that you'll need to be induced because you're likely to have a large baby again is a crock - however, we don't KNOW what the context of the conversation was. we dont KNOW how traumatic the initial birth was for the mother. was don't KNOW why the decision to induce early was made. yes, it's sad. but we don't KNOW and can't judge. the emotional and physical trauma of a large baby getting stuck and having to be ripped from it's mothers pelvis in a c/s can impact a mother forever. my SIL is, 7 years after this happened with her son, STILL traumatised by that birth. so yes, it's good to be educated, but being educated and STILL making a decision that goes against the grain doesn't mean you're making a mistake.

    and again, from a first time mother perspective - it feels VERY judgemental when your choices to follow your Ob/GP/midwife are being called into question. we all have our own reasons for choosing our mode of care, our own reasons for putting our faith in these individuals etc. it's not nice to read comments that insinuate that you're "blindly" being led by a medico. no doubt there are people who have blind faith in their medico, but most of us are smart enough to question the comments and decisions at every appointment. i'm not "blindly" being led and the insinuation that i (or any other first timer) am is just offensive.

    THIS is why i'm in here again - to try to ask people to show respect. just because our decisions aren't your decisions, just because our choices may mean we fall outside the realm of "normal" birth doesn't mean we're being led astray by our carers. they're OUR decisions and should be respected!





    ETA - lulu - if you're going to quote me, please quote the WHOLE statement so that you get the FULL context of my statement. the statement i made was

    i just want to be the voice of reason to remind people that not everyone reading a thread like this will have had the opportunity to educate themselves and some of the statements here having a dig at the medical professionals MIGHT be enough for people to start doubting the intentions of their doctor and, as a result, MAY have dire consequences....
    if someone goes around reading the Ob bashing that seems to be happening in threads like this, they may decide just to ignore the advice WITHOUT educating themselves. if you're uneducated and blindly trust a forum of this sort, you MIGHT put yours or your childs life at risk. i'm quite sure those ladies who've had late onset and severe pre-eclampsia would kick themselves if they'd decided to ignore their Ob's advice to be induced (Hollye?) and something gone wrong for themselves or their baby. i'm sure, in the heat of the moment, some of those ladies HAD to have blind faith in their carers. what a horrible thought - to put your faith in the people that saved you and your child...
    Last edited by briggsy's girl; May 23rd, 2009 at 03:17 PM.

  4. #22
    Lucy in the sky with diamonds.

    Jan 2005
    Funky Town, Vic
    7,070

    i guess so much comes down to what you accept as gospel. my ob said even with full blown GD he doesn't set an induction date until he can see signs that there is risk to the baby or parent - he scans at every appointment - refuses to look for "large" baby - he ONLY checks blood flow through the cord to ensure there is no reason to take action. yes, some OB's may work differently to this, but again, it comes down to education.

    fortunately there IS a lot of information out there for pregnant women to access (in comparison to what you can access about something like carpel tunnel release surgery) - and so much of what you get from your doctor comes down to what you're prepared to ask. i don't walk out of any appointment without all my questions answered - it's something i refuse to do. but that's ME. i guess it comes back to society as a whole. if we (in general) want childbirth to be viewed as a natural and normal part of life, what need is there for you to be educated in detail by a medical professional?? there is a LOT of emphasis on ensuring Ob's are only involved in "abnormal" birth - that is their specialty. so it comes down to finding a balance of resources. why, if we want them ONLY involved in abnormal birthing situations, should they spend hours explaining to us what a "normal" birth involves.

    having specialised surgery (ie carpal tunnel release) isn't an every day event. child birth is. IF society wants child birth to STOP being seen as a "medical" condition (which i agree with) society as a whole, also needs to take responsibility for normal education - if it's not a "medical" condition why should "medical" professionals and "medical" resources be used to educate people???

    yes, i'm argumentative today (and i'm damn good at it ) but i'm trying to make a point - you can't expect the medical community to step away from the birthing process and yet still invest time and resource into educating as to what is and isn't normal. you can't judge those that aren't educated on what is normal for believing in the medical professionals around them if the only option to get information is via that same medical professional! if you want to de-medicalise birth, you need to de-medicalise the education process! you can't do a half-assed job of it!

    i will stand by my earlier statements that we need to be VERY careful how things are worded in a thread like this. yes, being told at 30 weeks that you'll need to be induced because you're likely to have a large baby again is a crock - however, we don't KNOW what the context of the conversation was. we dont KNOW how traumatic the initial birth was for the mother. was don't KNOW why the decision to induce early was made. yes, it's sad. but we don't KNOW and can't judge. the emotional and physical trauma of a large baby getting stuck and having to be ripped from it's mothers pelvis in a c/s can impact a mother forever. my SIL is, 7 years after this happened with her son, STILL traumatised by that birth. so yes, it's good to be educated, but being educated and STILL making a decision that goes against the grain doesn't mean you're making a mistake.

    and again, from a first time mother perspective - it feels VERY judgemental when your choices to follow your Ob/GP/midwife are being called into question. we all have our own reasons for choosing our mode of care, our own reasons for putting our faith in these individuals etc. it's not nice to read comments that insinuate that you're "blindly" being led by a medico. no doubt there are people who have blind faith in their medico, but most of us are smart enough to question the comments and decisions at every appointment. i'm not "blindly" being led and the insinuation that i (or any other first timer) am is just offensive.

    THIS is why i'm in here again - to try to ask people to show respect. just because our decisions aren't your decisions, just because our choices may mean we fall outside the realm of "normal" birth doesn't mean we're being led astray by our carers. they're OUR decisions and should be respected!





    ETA - lulu - if you're going to quote me, please quote the WHOLE statement so that you get the FULL context of my statement. the statement i made was



    if someone goes around reading the Ob bashing that seems to be happening in threads like this, they may decide just to ignore the advice WITHOUT educating themselves. if you're uneducated and blindly trust a forum of this sort, you MIGHT put yours or your childs life at risk. i'm quite sure those ladies who've had late onset and severe pre-eclampsia would kick themselves if they'd decided to ignore their Ob's advice to be induced (Hollye?) and something gone wrong for themselves or their baby. i'm sure, in the heat of the moment, some of those ladies HAD to have blind faith in their carers. what a horrible thought - to put your faith in the people that saved you and your child...

    Do you think you might be taking things a bit personally?

  5. #23
    Registered User

    Dec 2005
    In Bankworld with Barbara
    14,222

    BG, No one has ever said that anyone should ignore medical advice relating to a medical condition which would indicate that an induction or c/s would be necessary. It's fair enough if a woman has very high BP or even pe that she accept an induction or c/s based on her own situation and everyone understands that sometimes intervention is necessary, but don't loose sight of the ORIGINAL POST, which IMO is a fair enough vent. There is far too much intervention for completely unnecessary or vague reasons and this is what RoryRory was trying to highlight. Big Babies at 30wks? Pffft to that! Even with not knowing the previous history of the person in the OP, it is far too early to put that kind of pressure and worry on a woman when it may not be necessary. And what do you think that woman is going to spend her last few weeks of pregnancy thinking about? Bloody big babies that wont fit And it's not just Obs that perpetrate it - it can be any pregnancy care provider. Just as many women have the **** scared out of them about big babies by midwives too.

  6. #24
    Registered User

    Feb 2009
    2,031

    I think it is important here to make a point of saying - I have never once, in 6 pregnancies, been seen by or spoken to an Ob. So I am certainly not "Ob bashing". I've never met one.

    I was told I was being induced on x day by a midwife. Now, that is not a "normal birth". She just medicalised it - so has a duty to inform me of the associated risks involved with this medical procedure. I never said they need to educate us on normal birth at all. This is a thread about intervention - thus medicalised birth. So yes - that is part of their job be they midwives, obs or GPs. They want to start doing it the medical way, then it is their job to make sure their patient is fully informed.

  7. #25
    Registered User

    Jan 2008
    Brisbane
    5,039

    Please BG take the time to re read my post.....

  8. #26
    Registered User

    May 2007
    Home
    2,050

    Wow! Intense thread!

    Inertia I think it is important here to make a point of saying - I have never once, in 6 pregnancies, been seen by or spoken to an Ob. So I am certainly not "Ob bashing". I've never met one.

    I was told I was being induced on x day by a midwife. Now, that is not a "normal birth". She just medicalised it - so has a duty to inform me of the associated risks involved with this medical procedure. I never said they need to educate us on normal birth at all. This is a thread about intervention - thus medicalised birth. So yes - that is part of their job be they midwives, obs or GPs. They want to start doing it the medical way, then it is their job to make sure their patient is fully informed.
    I really liked your point Inertia!

    With DD my waters broke early in the morning, and didn't have any signs of a labour. In the afternoon i started having some mild period pains. The midwives hooked me up to syntocin (sp?) around 5pm and by 5:30 i was in full blown labour. It was horribly painful as my body didn't get time to 'build up' to the pain as its suppose to. By the time i asked for an epidural it was too late as i was feeling the urge to push.

    I really wish i had have been informed on what this drug would do to me. I was young and had no idea! Their explaination about the whole thing went something like this -"We're going to hook you up to some jungle juice, to speed things up".
    My birth plan went out the window (i wanted to spend a lot of time in the bath to ease pain but wasn't allowed - because i was on sytocin they told me they needed the monitors on the baby at all times )

    I know i was very uninformed and i really should have researched more into labour but i still feel they should have told me more about the drug, what it would do etc. And i also wish they just left me alone! I was beginning to have period pains, i'm sure things would have progressed naturally from there.

    This time i've grown some balls (as holley mentioned, hehe) - but still doesn't mean i'm not scared crapless! My only memory is that extreme intense pain out of nowhere

    Tegam-
    So as I see it we need forums like this to help bring NATURAL birth back to the "norm" for 1st timers and support them to have enough strength in such a scary time to stand up for themselves and their babies!
    - couldn't agree more, i just wish i had have looked more into BB with my first pregnancy, i feel things may have gone differently

    Gosh i hope i haven't offended anyone

  9. #27
    Registered User

    Dec 2006
    In my own private paradise
    15,272

    Lulu - i'm not taking this overly personally - i've simply made a point of being someone to say (in more than JUST this thread) that we need to be careful how things are worded to ensure that people googling (and yes, these threads show up in google) are getting a balanced argument. and it seems i am the only one prepared to step up and say something against the grain


    Trillian - if you read my posts, i have acknowledged that saying induction due to a large baby at 30 weeks is a crock. i did though also take into account that we don't KNOW the circumstances surrounding the persons first birth or her discussions with her care providers that lead to that decision. My SIL had a VERY traumatic second birth in which her son got stuck in the birth canal and, during emergency c/s they had to have two Ob's work on her - one to push him out of the birth canal and one to remove him through the c/s incision. her third child was a planned c/s. partially due to the size of her babies (number 3 was, by LMP, 4 weeks early, by scan 3 weeks), partially due to the fact that the damage done by number 2. number 3 was 7pound plus and came as a result of spontaneous labour starting and c/s being performed. there are circumstances where it IS appropriate to schedule a c/s in advance! as Rory acknowledged after she spoke to her hubby, she simply doesn't know the whole story.

    i am just trying to be the ONE person brave enough to stand against the anti-intervention tone of this thread in case someone is reading that simply hasn't had enough chance to research for themselves.

    yes, you should be advised about what is happening at every point - but some responsibility has to fall on you to educate yourself. this is not having a dig at anyone it's just a fact. there is thread after thread about the lack of funding for midwifery led care and yet an expectation is put on an already overly stretched resource to "fully educate" people at the end of their pregnancy about something they have had months to inform themselves about.

    i will now step out of this thread as it appears offering any counter argument isn't appreciated - even when the OP has HERSELF acknowledged that they didn't know the full story behind the comment that triggered her vent. it isn't only me that is thinking this (if it was, i wouldn't have received more than one lot of rep points thanking me for stepping in) - i'm just the person who has been brave enough to say something.

    for any first timers reading this thread - please, educate YOURSELF on your options. don't just take the word of any medical professional - on ANYTHING. you wouldn't allow someone to perform unnecessary surgery on any other part of you without knowing why and understanding so please take the time to educate yourself on your birth options. if you're not getting the answers you need from your care provider, push them to give you the answers. in no other facet of your life do you hand yourself over with no question to the consequences, why should birth be any different? if something doesn't make sense ASK ASK ASK. Ask the same question 10 times if you need to. get a second opinion if you need to. but always remember - the decision to follow their suggestions is entirely YOURS - don't allow yourself to feel judged by others if you choose to do something they may not agree with

  10. #28
    Lucy in the sky with diamonds.

    Jan 2005
    Funky Town, Vic
    7,070

    This was a vent thread about crappy advice. No obs bashing at all, in fact everyone has pointed that fact out.

    Crappy advice has been given, it's ok to vent about that isn't it? I'm not sure what is 'brave' about offering a counter to a point that doesn't exist, in a venting thread. It's about as brave as going into the c/s support thread and banging on about the dangers of the theatre.

  11. #29
    Registered User

    Dec 2005
    In Bankworld with Barbara
    14,222

    I took the orginal vent as one of just a long line of misinformation kwim? And just more of a frustration at hearing the same old worn out myths over and over again. Not everyone does research the net or join a web forum to educate themselves. Many people will rely on the experiences of family and friends when making their own decisions about it and you just know that when you hear something like that said, that someone is going to take that as gospel simply because the person saying it was told that by a Dr .

  12. #30
    Registered User

    Jan 2006
    Melbourne
    2,732

    yes, being told at 30 weeks that you'll need to be induced because you're likely to have a large baby again is a crock - however, we don't KNOW what the context of the conversation was. we dont KNOW how traumatic the initial birth was for the mother. was don't KNOW why the decision to induce early was made. yes, it's sad. but we don't KNOW and can't judge.
    BG I agree with you here a little - my initial vent was very generalised and I tried to point out in a later post that there are often extenuating circumstances that need to be taken into account. But....

    I took the orginal vent as one of just a long line of misinformation kwim? And just more of a frustration at hearing the same old worn out myths over and over again.
    Trillian you hit the nail on the head. I was more having a general winge about how almost every pregnant woman or woman who has birthed who I talk to seems to say similar things. Like "I tore last time so this time I have having a c/s" or "my sister and mum had c/sections so I expect one myself" or "Last time I was administered an epidural right away because my baby was posterior". You have got to wonder how many women who have "extenuating circumstances" are in that situation because of a lack of info/awareness, rather than truly unusual or unavoidable medical complications.

    So I guess my two cents after the last two pages of posts is - how many traumatic births where the women and babies are saved by intervention were actually precipitated by unwarranted intervention in the first place? Sadly, because so many women who endure birth trauma seem to only find solace in assurances from their doctors that they "would have both died" but for the intervention itself, I doubt we will ever truly know the answer to this question. Because if we look for the answer we risk going to places where many women dare not look (and by this I don't mean that we should be looking to blame women themselves!)

    (And BG while I know you have bowed out of this post I do applaud your having put forward a different POV)

  13. #31
    Registered User

    Jan 2008
    Brisbane
    5,039

    So I guess my two cents after the last two pages of posts is - how many traumatic births where the women and babies are saved by intervention were actually precipitated by unwarranted intervention in the first place? Sadly, because so many women who endure birth trauma seem to only find solace in assurances from their doctors that they "would have both died" but for the intervention itself, I doubt we will ever truly know the answer to this question. Because if we look for the answer we risk going to places where many women dare not look (and by this I don't mean that we should be looking to blame women themselves!)
    well said!



    but does the answer lie in the fact that whilst intervention has sky rocketed in the past 20 years child and maternal death has stayed the same? if all this intervention was needed then wouldnt the rates have dropped????

  14. #32
    Registered User

    Aug 2006
    Our house, in the middle of our street
    1,996

    I will admit to having given BG rep points with regards to her posts. It's not that i wasn't brave enough to say anything, more that BG is able to voice her opinion, and one that I agree with, more eloquently than I. Thanks BG. I understood exactly where you are coming from.

  15. #33
    Registered User

    Jan 2006
    8,369

    I had VERY medicinalised care for DS - something that I didn't want, but DH pushed all the way. I didn't get a say because he DID decide what was going to happen to me - then wussed out when he saw what those evil people did to me. Not his fault. Oh no. He just didn't want me to give birth.

    I had constant measurements - too big baby and too small bump. Told off for both.

    I was even told off for being "too relaxed" - pregnancy is, of course, a state of stress and we all NEED to give ourselves pre-eclampsia: I'm sure the midwives would have raised my blood pressure if they could. Good thing I knew enough to ignore them.

    Pregnancy, 99% of the time, is not an illness. There are times you need the doctor but in most pregnancies you could go from conception to birth all by yourself, without dates, without bullies, without being told what to do.

    BG, you do have a pregnancy-related illness that is not in any way your fault. And you're doing the right thing discussing with your carers (you seem to be getting care, wonders never cease) what is going to happen that is the best thing for you and the baby. But I'll be honest, I got no discussion whatsoever.

    As for "growing balls the second time around." What are you thinking? That I just lie there and say "chop me up without permission please?" That I didn't fight tooth and nail? Just shut up before I get really upset about that. Just because I now have a REASON not to tell DH about any pregnancy or labour doesn't mean I did the wrong thing by letting him know about Liebling. He needed a chance to fail, don't anyone dare tell me that I should ignore my child's father on a whim and not concrete evidence.

  16. #34
    Registered User

    Jan 2008
    Brisbane
    5,039


    1) Pregnancy, 99% of the time, is not an illness. There are times you need the doctor but in most pregnancies you could go from conception to birth all by yourself, without dates, without bullies, without being told what to do.


    2) As for "growing balls the second time around." What are you thinking? That I just lie there and say "chop me up without permission please?" That I didn't fight tooth and nail? Just shut up before I get really upset about that.
    i dont know how to multi quote....

    1) here here

    2)Are you telling yourself to stop talking by saying shut up or the rest of us in this thread?

    also

    Do you really believe that you couldnt get a better birth for yourself next time (if there was to be a next time)...Thats all i meant about women tending to have a more positive 2nd birth experience, that whilst you can fight tooth and nail the 1st time.....2nd time you know the system better to fight maybe not harder but more strategically? If the answer is no to that question than i guess that the system is stuffed and there is no hope in making it better for others........... That would be a really sad future for all ourselves, our sisters and daughters!

  17. #35
    Registered User

    Jan 2006
    8,369

    The ONLY reason I will give birth should I have another child is because I will not be in the system. I worked for it. I knew what it was like. And ANYONE suggesting I could have done better, even with hindsight or the next time around, should be bound and gagged before I attack them. The only way I could improve and give birth is by not telling DH I'm pregnant and/or in labour.

    The system is stuffed, there is no hope for any woman who enters therein. Which is why I am pushing freebirth being a more acceptable alternative to torture.

  18. #36
    BellyBelly Life Subscriber

    Feb 2006
    South Eastern Suburbs, Vic
    6,054

    Ryn, I acknowledge that you found your first birth experience to be beyond awful. I am convinced however, that there could be a way for your second birth (if you have another bub) to be different, as in better, without needing to freebirth. Now, I don't know what that would take, I don't know the UK system. It might take a lot. You might need to hire an expensive midwife/doula, you might need to birth in a different country (can't tell you how often I've dreamed of moving to NZ just for the birthing options!).
    Edited out my story, a bit personal, and it's served its purpose.
    I hope this doesn't offend you or anything, and I'm sure our experiences aren't really comparable, but I just wanted to share, and encourage you (and others who may have also had un-fun experiences) that I'm sure you can have a good birth after an awful birth.
    Last edited by Nelle; August 6th, 2009 at 03:29 PM. : editing out personal info :)

1234