That's really NOT what I was getting at. I am so not victorian era. Men and women both need sex, typically at different levels though. Women can get their fix from affection and typically have a lower libido then men. No lies there, no ancient misogynistic rhetoric.
And for the record, I didn't imply that women were asexual, just that we are more wired to affection and men more wired to sex.
It ticks me off when I can't simply acknowledge that without being dragged back to the Victorian era. It just is what it is.
I have no problem whatsoever putting out when DH feels like it and I don't. It's because I love doing things for DH that make him feel good, even if I aren't into it initially.
Bookmarks