After a baby is born, it’s common practice to immediately clamp and cut the umbilical cord, before passing the baby to her mother.
After all, the placenta and umbilical cord are unnecessary once the baby has arrived, right?
Due to a plethora of studies telling us that waiting before clamping the cord does offer benefits to newborns (after 10 years of lobbying, the UK are finally set to make delayed clamping to be standard practice), some of us have started to open our minds to the possibility of leaving the cord alone after the birth.
It seems that we’ve been thinking incorrectly in the past.
New research just out suggests that waiting before cutting the cord has more far-reaching benefits than we realised, with impacts well past infancy.
Researchers suggest that waiting at least three minutes before cutting the umbilical cord after the birth may help to improve children’s fine motor and social skills at four years of age. This is in addition to the huge benefits already discovered.
Globally, clamping and cutting the umbilical cord immediately after birth is standard practice. In 2011, researchers demonstrated that leaving the cord intact for at least three minutes decreases the risk of iron deficiency in babies for up to 4-6 months after birth. Now we are learning that delayed clamping provides long-term benefits too.
Delaying clamping of the umbilical cord allows the volume of blood from the placenta and cord to transfer to the baby. This increases the baby’s blood volume by up to a third, providing valuable red blood cells and boosting iron stores. It also contains precious stem cells that belong to your baby. Why cut off this valuable source of goodness?
What The Researchers Found
In their investigation, the researchers followed up on babies from their earlier study. The children were now four years of age. Of the original 600 infants, 263 children took part in the study. Of these children, 141 had cord clamping delayed by three or more minutes after birth. The other 122 had cord clamping within 10 seconds of birth.
The researchers completed developmental assessments, including IQ and cognitive tests. Parents completed a questionnaire regarding social and personal care skills. The results of the tests and questionnaires showed there was no difference in IQ or development between the children who had immediate cord cutting and those whose cords were left intact for three minutes after birth.
But what the test results did show is that the boys who had delayed cord clamping (DCC) had better fine motor skills, such as gripping a pen, and more pro-social behaviour, compared to those boys who had immediate cord clamping after birth.
Girls generally have better iron stores from birth, and are better protected against iron deficiency.
Why Does Iron Matter?
Iron deficiency has long been associated with poor behavioral, motor and intellectual development in children. The World Health Organisation (WHO) recommends leaving the cord intact for one minute as a general practice, with a target of at least three minutes if possible.
Other peak groups as the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) also recommend delayed or deferred cord clamping for at least one minute. The practice is not widespread, but is growing as the evidence showing the clear benefits grows.
Doctors vary in their understanding of the current evidence showing that delayed cord clamping is beneficial to babies for the first 6 months following birth. This new research has long term implications for how maternity care providers proceed with the management of the third stage of birth.
Iron deficiency in toddlers has become prevalent in developed countries. Statistics showing countries such as Australia, the US and UK have an average 10% of children aged between 1-3 with iron deficiency. During early infancy, the brain is rapidly growing and developing and iron is essential to that process. Limiting the amount of iron that is available to a baby during this time of rapid brain growth clearly impacts future brain development.
While iron supplements are an option, natural sources of iron are more gentle to tummies (much less likely to cause constipation) and are more readily absorbed.
More Information On Delayed Cord Clamping:
- Delayed Cord Clamping – Why You Should Demand It
- 8 Reasons NOT To Cut Your Baby’s Umbilical Cord
- Delayed Cord Clamping Facebook Page (Facebook page full of all the latest information)
You need the BellyBelly Birth & Early Parenting Immersion!
MAXIMISE your chances of getting the birth you want… MINIMISE your chances of a disappointing or traumatic birth experience. Feel MORE CONFIDENT heading into birth… GUARANTEED.
FIND OUT MORE!
- 3KShares
Great article! I practise delayed cord clamp here in my clinic almost a years..theres a great benefits awaits to the newborn..pls keep sending more great articles about mmaternal and child health…keep it up, more power!
I did this when my children were born, 16 & 19 yrs ago, not because of any studies, simply because it felt right and natural. Glad to see science is starting to catch up with instinct!!
Well done you! This world needs more mothers like you who listen to their instincts and stand up for what they think is right. In a time when it wasn’t common practice to speak up about such “unusual” practices….you should be applauded.
Beautiful article.Why institutions,obstetricians,midwives everywhere in the world have so much difficulty in translating medical evidence into practice?It’s difficult to apply good birth practice, it’s only laziness or lack of knowledge ?May be the hospitals are no longer the safest place to give birth.
my wife is 8 and half months pregnant. the baby is in breech presentation and a recent sonography has detected a chord around the foetal neck. doctors have already suggest for C section delivery. my question is, whether in case of caesarean delivery is it possible to wait for 1 or 2 minutes before clamping the umbilical chord?
I am a labor & delivery nurse and yes, we can do delayed cord clamping following a cesarean delivery, even in a case such as your wife’s.
This is an interesting article. Forgive me if I missed it but who were the researchers and where were they published?
Great article thanks for posting I was born in the Dominican republic in the mountains with no hospital around. My Grandmother was the midwife for everyone. at the time of me being born my Mom was in Labor all alone with only my other 7 siblings all very young 11 yrs and younger around . they had to go get Grandma which took some time for her to get there on her Donkey..I was one of those babies with Delayed Clamping and never knew the benefits that came with it on a medical way.. But one thing that I can test to and say is that out of 9 of us born to my mom I have the closest bond to my mother and a deep emotional relationship with her.. Today my mom is 85 yrs old withy Dementia and dont speak anymore but we understand each other and I communicate with her just touching her 1 finger that she moves and with her eyes I know what she is saying.. Thank you
wow that’s beautiful Roman Guaraguaorix, thanks for sharing your story
I believe early cord clamping is also related to breathing problems of the infant. They still need the few shots of oxygen coming through the cord. Often baby is held overnight when it wouldn’t be necessary if the doctors wouldn’t be so impatient in cutting the cord. I just hope more women want to be educated and start demanding changes. It won’t happen from the medical community, parents have to demand it.
Forgive my ignorance but can you delay chord clamping and still have skin to skin contact straight after birth?