No, but I didn't find it a problem. I discussed with him many times what my preferences were but I didn't go into massive detail about how and why I had come to those preferences. That was enough, we were both on the same page. I guess I am pretty lucky in that he is pretty cluey so even if I didn't got into tonnes of detail he is pretty good at filling in the blanks and understanding where I or other points of view are coming from without having it spelled out IYKWIM.

But really when it came to the crunch I don't think it mattered all that much. I made decisions with my ob and my midwife which I was 100% comfortable with (even though some varied from my preferences) and I was very capable of saying what I wanted and negotiating how things went. So DHs 'voice' wasn't really called upon. Not to say he wasn't involved, her certainly was (he was manning a leg when I started pushing!), but he was not required as an advocate.